Vic moved 1 division above and was not his usual destructive self.. he was the matador last night not the bull.. It yet again proved how hard it is to move up in weight and be the same fighter(other e.g Pavlik-hopkins, hatton-collazo, Oscar-hopkins etc. etc.)... And Pac moving up 1 division after another and destroying guys is being badly overlooked atleast in this forum where haters are even accusing PAC of cherrypicking..
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
VIC losing shows how great PAC really is...
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by jdubb863 View PostYeah Juan manuel Marquez is great....... He can move up in weight and KO the 35' pounders "catchweight" Pacquiao avoided.
I think that Vic fight last night showed how good and powerful Donaire is!
Comment
-
Originally posted by johncods View PostVic moved 1 division above and was not his usual destructive self.. he was the matador last night not the bull.. It yet again proved how hard it is to move up in weight and be the same fighter(other e.g Pavlik-hopkins, hatton-collazo, Oscar-hopkins etc. etc.)... And Pac moving up 1 division after another and destroying guys is being badly overlooked atleast in this forum where haters are even accusing PAC of cherrypicking..
Yeah Pac is great, but using Vic as an example to display how great he is, seems pretty lame, since Vic is one of the least skilled fighters in sport today.
Comment
-
Originally posted by johncods View PostVic moved 1 division above and was not his usual destructive self.. he was the matador last night not the bull.. It yet again proved how hard it is to move up in weight and be the same fighter(other e.g Pavlik-hopkins, hatton-collazo, Oscar-hopkins etc. etc.)... And Pac moving up 1 division after another and destroying guys is being badly overlooked atleast in this forum where haters are even accusing PAC of cherrypicking..
and Vic didnt demand a catchweight either. hmmmm............
Comment
-
Comment