If we want to see Mayweather-Pacquiao then Pac should not fight Cotto

[sweetpea87]

I was just thinking that I have heard a lot of talks about a Pac-Cotto showdown, which I think would be a hell of a fight, but I think Cotto presents to big of a risk for Pac. I want to see Cotto fight Mosley rather so we can see Pac-Mayweather which would be the biggest fight since De La Hoya Mayweather, but you know if would be a better fight than that!

[DIB42]

Mayweather is a big risk for pacman too, however a mayweather risk would pay more than the risk he'll take with cotto

[sweetpea87]

For sure I'm not trying to say that he is not, it's just that pac-mayweather seems to be the the only thing everyone is talking about. So if either of them want to see that I say pac just wait it out til marquez-mayweather is over.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

PAcquiao vs cotto will be better for the sport than a mayweather fight.

That way, mayweather will have to fight Mosley, and the winner will get the winner of Cotto-Pacquiao, and better yet, if Floyd and Cotto win like they should, we get to see, Cotto-Floyd and sice pacquiao would have lost, then JMM vs Pacquiao 3 at 140, for the lineal title.

In the end its beter for the fans for Pacquiao not to fight Floyd!!!!!!!!

[MANGLER]

I'd rather see Pac-JMM 3 and Mr boat buyer against a top WW, but too late for that. Pac-Cotto better not happen. Cotto should fight SSM again if he beats Clottey. But if Cotto wins and fights Pac, MR boat buyer pretty much has to man up and fight SSM or go the **** home.

[sweetpea87]

Thats an interesting way to look at it champ. I always thought lets see Cotto-Mosley 2 and Pac-Mayweather then the winners fight each other but your thought works just as well.

[el malo]

I was just thinking that I have heard a lot of talks about a Pac-Cotto showdown, which I think would be a hell of a fight, but I think Cotto presents to big of a risk for Pac. I want to see Cotto fight Mosley rather so we can see Pac-Mayweather which would be the biggest fight since De La Hoya Mayweather, but you know if would be a better fight than that!

i agree as long as the winners then fight eachother. But one of the four will retire instead of fight the other winner. Guess who that guy is? We need a guarantee that the winners will face so we need pac vs cotto or ssm first.

[el malo]

Thats why we cant give the skipper a pac fight cuz then after that we wont see boat buyer fight a top ww. He'll run back into retirement. I can hear it now "what has cotto done to deserve a shot, he doesnt bring enough money. And shane ducked me before and he dont bring enough money either." we need to force a ww on that coward.

[Pullcounter]

I was just thinking that I have heard a lot of talks about a Pac-Cotto showdown, which I think would be a hell of a fight, but I think Cotto presents to big of a risk for Pac. I want to see Cotto fight Mosley rather so we can see Pac-Mayweather which would be the biggest fight since De La Hoya Mayweather, but you know if would be a better fight than that!

pac/cotto aint gonna happen cause cotto won't do 142. cotto should just go fight mosley

[Owlzfan84]

I'd rather see Pac-JMM 3 and Mr boat buyer against a top WW, but too late for that. Pac-Cotto better not happen. Cotto should fight SSM again if he beats Clottey. But if Cotto wins and fights Pac, MR boat buyer pretty much has to man up and fight SSM or go the **** home.

I'm with you on pac-jmm 3. That would def be the most entertaining and best fight you could make right now. Their just taylor made for each other and will always have close and entertaining fights.