POLL: Even Match-UP - NO EXCUSES thread.

[THE REED]

Pacman Hatton is an even match-up to me. There is no excuses come fight time. Whoever wins this fight, beat a prime pound for pound fighter. We can talk all day about who MIGHT be bigger. Fact is, were talking about peanut comparisons.. These guys are roughly the same damn size.

Hatton is undefeated in about 42-43 fights at 140 lbs. Pacman is the p4p #1 fighter in the sport. This is a true mega matchup.. and after the fight there will be no excuses whatsoever.

I dont wanna hear "pacman wasnt that big anyways" or "Hatton was overrated anyways"..

Both these fighters are in prime physical condition and at the top of their game.

This is a FULL CREDIT fight.

So vote now and pledge.

NO EXCUSES. WINNER GETS RESPECT.

[MaFu MoFo]

Very ture. It's a fair match-up.

[Sin City]

What Pacquiao lacks in size, he has in skill.
What Hatton has in size, he lacks in skill.
Pretty even match up IMO.

I disagree with them being "the same exact size" though but whoever wins gets full credit.

[hammerhiem]

This is an even fight, and winner gets FULL credit.

But only pacman will get it.

[FMJ The Best]

Good poll idea.

Definitely an even fight.

Anyone who votes that it isn't has an agenda, motive or is a nut hugging bastard.

[THE REED]

What Pacquiao lacks in size, he has in skill.
What Hatton has in size, he lacks in skill.
Pretty even match up IMO.

I disagree with them being "the same exact size" though but whoever wins gets full credit.

its peanuts though... hatton has a larger waist, pacman has a bigger chest...

Its not as though pacman is full of water just to put on weight, he will be ripped at 140.. he will be just as or even more solid then hatton...


Like you said...

What Pacquiao lacks in size, he has in skill.
What Hatton has in size, he lacks in skill.

[MANGLER]

No reason to **** on the winner, as long as it ain't a bull**** robbery on the cards.

[Sin City]

its peanuts though... hatton has a larger waist, pacman has a bigger chest...

Its not as though pacman is full of water just to put on weight, he will be ripped at 140.. he will be just as or even more solid then hatton...


Like you said...

What Pacquiao lacks in size, he has in skill.
What Hatton has in size, he lacks in skill.

Hatton is a small dude IMO, he is just a fatty.
Regardless, Manny Pacquiao was at 130 two fights ago.

I think it's funny that when I used the tale of the tape to compare Mayweather and De La Hoya, all his fans where making excuses on how that wasn't how you determine size.
Now they are trying to use it to justify a fight with Marquez left and right.

like it or not, Mayweather is closer in size to De La Hoya and Miguel Cotto:


then he is to Manny Pacquiao and Marquez.

[THE REED]

Hatton is a small dude IMO, he is just a fatty.
Regardless, Manny Pacquiao was at 130 two fights ago.

I think it's funny that when I used the tale of the tape to compare Mayweather and De La Hoya, all his fans where making excuses on how that wasn't how you determine size.
Now they are trying to use it to justify a fight with Marquez left and right.

like it or not, Mayweather is closer in size to De La Hoya and Miguel Cotto:


then he is to Manny Pacquiao and Marquez.

I would also agree with that... You can grow in size...

I know manny was at 130 2 fights ago... and david diaz is no world beater... but he dismantled him and oscar... granted oscar was no where near what he SHOULD OF been..

the point is... pacman could of showed up at 147, slow, sloppy, and blown up and beat an old drained oscar and look OKAY doin it.

but he didnt... he looked fast, he looked strong, he looked fluid with his punches... and he completely ripped oscar apart...

so at 140, he is definitely a legitimiate pound for pound threat, and so is hatton...

[PittyPat]

Either man is an excellent and essential name on the other's resume. I'm a Hatton fan but I like Pac otherwise, so I'll have no qualms in giving him full credit if he beats my man. With that said, I'll still be supporter of both regardless of who wins.