NO to both fighters. When i think of HOF fighters i think of greats and i think of neither guy when i think of great. they were at best good fighters that i respect because they were entertaining but no i dont think they are HOF material.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
if YOU had a vote..would gatti,tarver get into the hall of fame??
Collapse
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostI say no to both. The hall of fame should be reserved for the best of the best. Niether Gatti nor Tarver fit that description.
There are enough fighters unworthy of the HOF that are already in, and many that have been worthy that keep getting passed over.
Comment
-
there is youtube for those who wont get in...
& a whole lot of threads & articles for future generations to peruse about these borderline "great" fighters...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Feint View PostGatti might get my vote by a slight margin, but Tarver would not.
I think the Hall of Fame should be for all-time great boxers, not just good ones.
Comment
-
-
Tarver is a legend who's fought everyone possible at light heavy.
A lot worse guys got in.
Tarver's resume overall is quite impressive only fighting 31 times.
Tarver's wins crush Gatti's and everyone knows it.
Gatti is just a fan favorite.
Comment
Comment