Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is it ok for Oscar to outweigh Floyd but not Cotto?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Nah, I'll lick his balls

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Horus View Post
      This thread is the equivalent to someone saying

      Why are you complaining about paying 400 dollars to rent this jeep...
      when you paid 400 dollars to rent the benz..

      or

      Why are complaining about about paying $10 to get into at my house party..
      When didnt complain about paying $10 to get into Playboy Mansion Party..

      Everybody in boxing would fight Oscar de la hoya over cotto...

      Especially a Oscar de la hoya who was the #1 ranked fighter @ 154 and the WBC champion.



      This thread is classic.
      Nobody is saying he shouldnt have fought Oscar

      The question is why you guys brag about FLoyd beating a JMW with no problem, but when it comes to a top WW, FLoyd is too small?

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View Post
        Only one of them can be a fluke, dude. You said the second one couldn't have been. Guess what that means?
        Why does one of them have to be a fluke?

        When your beat down by the person you already beat, that is no fluke. When you get completely schooled, that is no fluke either. If this was the case, then every single rematch in history is a fluke.

        Comment


          #34
          This Video still makes me laugh to this day.


          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by F l i c k e r View Post
            If you didn't contradict yourself then why say Floyd should fight a tune up with WW fighters. All the big money names either have a fight comming up or already fought. Mosley isn't going to fight Floyd, so we all need to get over that matchup. Floyd doesn't need to go looking for WWs, if they want to fight then come to him. Like you said about Cotto-Williams right?

            Cotto has cherry picked fights. Then he takes a chance and gets KTFO and no one wants to accept it. Their hearts are too broken to accept that he loss.

            Which one came first? Match 1; inexperience. Match 2; more knowledgable.
            Therefore I will always judge Williams-Quintana by the rematch. When Quintana gets his name back up the ranks and fights Williams in the rubber match. Then my opinion will change. Until then, Williams bested Quintana. Not by decision but KO.
            1. Mosley has stated he is only fighting Cotto, hattin/Pacquiao and FLOYD MAYWEATHER


            2.Tell when Cotto has cherry picked a fight.

            3.So Williams became more knowledable in 3 months? Koin people in round dont mean **** unless they have Iron chin ala Margarito.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by F l i c k e r View Post
              Why does one of them have to be a fluke?

              When your beat down by the person you already beat, that is no fluke. When you get completely schooled, that is no fluke either. If this was the case, then every single rematch in history is a fluke.
              If in one fight you thoroughly outbox the guy for 12 rounds, are never hurt, stunned or knocked down in all of those 12 rounds. The next fight a few months later you get caught cold in the 1st and stopped. One of them has to be a fluke. Logic dictates which one.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by F l i c k e r View Post
                Why does one of them have to be a fluke?

                When your beat down by the person you already beat, that is no fluke. When you get completely schooled, that is no fluke either. If this was the case, then every single rematch in history is a fluke.
                So you are saying Williams-Quintana 1 and 2 were legit beatdowns for both people.... then why does williams get the rematch and quintana doesnt?

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by {}{}MATADOR{}{} View Post
                  All this Bull**** about Floyd being too small to fight the top welterweights because he is outweighed on fight night is just an excuse to avoid the REAL challenges.

                  Oscar outweighed Floyd by 10 pounds on fight night. Why is it OK for Oscar to outweigh Floyd but not Cotto?

                  I'll tell you why, it's because Oscar was old and Cotto is in his PRIME.

                  The ******ity of the *****s always amazes me.

                  Excuse after Excuse after Excuse
                  ...

                  Co-sign homey. Mr boat buyer could fight Leila Ali and his ****suckers on here would be cool wit it. No SSM or Cotto tho.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Danny Gunz View Post
                    So you are saying Williams-Quintana 1 and 2 were legit beatdowns for both people.... then why does williams get the rematch and quintana doesnt?
                    No kidding, if neither one was a fluke, why not a third fight? Especially when you claim everyone is ducking you, why not fight the only guy to ever beat you? Why does the second fight always carry more weight than the first? What if two guys are perfectly evenly matched and they win one fight a piece?

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR View Post
                      Nobody is saying he shouldnt have fought Oscar

                      The question is why you guys brag about FLoyd beating a JMW with no problem, but when it comes to a top WW, FLoyd is too small?
                      Once again..for the 1 million time.

                      THE 1 HUGE PROBLEM THAT ALL FLOYD FANS SHARE IS THIS:


                      Floyd fans have no problem with floyd fighting Other WW's...
                      The problem is that People saying he can ONLY fight Welterweights for it to be a legitimate fight and win, when he himself is not really a welterweight compare to the rest of the welterweights...

                      People say all he has to fight a real WW and nobody else..!!!

                      thats what make floyd fans feel like you guys are bing hypocritical....

                      and plus..

                      Floyd has already become lineal WW champion of the world.




                      • I Didnt see people having a problem with Middleweight Hopkins Fighting a jr.middleweight De La hoya at the time instead of a top middleweight
                      • I Didnt see people having with A jr. Middleweight Oscar De La Hoya Fighting a small welterweight in Mayweather at the time instead of a top jr.middleweight
                      • I Didnt see people having with Middleweight Marvin Hagler Fighting a jr. Middleweight in Thomas Hearns at the time instead of a top middleweight


                      Why is that Mosely& Cotto can call out Pacquaio and Hatton but Floyd can't?
                      (which he still havent did)

                      Why cant Floyd fight people his own size and even smaller then him when he himself is a small dude fighting bigger dudes all the time is my point...


                      People get mad because I apply the standards on other fighters that they apply to Floyd...but my whole thing is dont be a hypocrite.
                      1. If you think it is Cool for Pacquaio to fight Hatton...Then you should think it's Cool For Pacquaio to fight Floyd...
                      2. If you think It's cool for Floyd to fight Paul Williams, then you should think it's cool for Floyd to fight somebody has tremendous physical advantages over...



                      You get my point.... DONT MAKE SPECIAL RULES for Floyd and not everybody else. thats been my problem from day 1.

                      DOUBLE STANDARDS[/FONT]

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP