Originally posted by Pacmanjay
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New Pacquiao Training Vid
Collapse
-
-
Manny's looking good, but we would expect nothing less. You can start to see the size difference more between the two though, as Manny is looking a lot smaller framed now. Ricky is at his fight night weight at the moment, around 154, and is looking much bigger..
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jching View PostManny's looking good, but we would expect nothing less. You can start to see the size difference more between the two though, as Manny is looking a lot smaller framed now. Ricky is at his fight night weight at the moment, around 154, and is looking much bigger..
I find it laughable when people mention out of all fighters, Hatton, being so much bigger than Pacquiao and that he'll over power him. If you think Hatton can beat Manny, fine. But find a real legitimate reason. Hatton isn't big enough that he'll completely overwhelm Manny. He couldn't even overwhelm Malanaggi, who is as weak as can be for a fighter in these weigh classes. And you think Hatton is MUCH BIGGER than Pacquiao. Jesus ***ing christ.
Manny is looking a lot smaller framed now? What the *** does that supposed to mean? How is a 154 lb Ricky Hatton SO MUCH bigger than a 150 lb Pacquiao? BTW Pacquiao probably has more lean mass weight than Hatton.
How does this look MUCH BIGGER to you?
Comment
-
Originally posted by SpArKeD-CoLd View Postgood fighter, but nothing special. HAtton will do him over
lol, I think you got it backwards there buddy.
btw, I'm no Hatton basher. I think he's a legitimate opponent who poses a threat for Manny and any less than 100% effort from Manny will be not good. But as long as Manny is motivated to train hard and win the fight, I think Manny will take the win. Reason being that, they may be equally hard workers, but Manny is a more talented and physically gifted athlete. I'm not one of those people who think Manny will have a walk in the park.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pacmanjay View PostI find it laughable when people mention out of all fighters, Hatton, being so much bigger than Pacquiao and that he'll over power him. If you think Hatton can beat Manny, fine. But find a real legitimate reason. Hatton isn't big enough that he'll completely overwhelm Manny. He couldn't even overwhelm Malanaggi, who is as weak as can be for a fighter in these weigh classes. And you think Hatton is MUCH BIGGER than Pacquiao. Jesus ***ing christ.
Manny is looking a lot smaller framed now? What the *** does that supposed to mean? How is a 154 lb Ricky Hatton SO MUCH bigger than a 150 lb Pacquiao? BTW Pacquiao probably has more lean mass weight than Hatton.
How does this look MUCH BIGGER to you?
Oh, and Malignaggi is a weak puncher, but the guy is tough as nails - he fought Cotto with a broken jaw ffs and didnt get KO'd. And he did get overwhelmed - did you not see how eager Malignaggi was to clinch with Hatton the entire fight? He was scared s***less of gettin KO'd.Last edited by - JCHING -; 03-27-2009, 11:44 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jching View PostYou can't say from that pic who is bigger as they aren't pictured together, and so the proportions are not correct. From pictures actually of them together, you can see that Hatton is the bigger framed man, and this cannot be denied. It may not make that much of a difference in the fight, but its the truth.
Oh, and Malignaggi is a weak puncher, but the guy is tough as nails - he fought Cotto with a broken jaw ffs and didnt get KO'd. And he did get overwhelmed - did you not see how eager Malignaggi was to clinch with Hatton the entire fight? He was scared s***less of gettin KO'd.
..............................
so when a pic fits your description (a pic that appears as though Hatton has a much bigger frame) then pics are accurate, but when they don't, they aren't. RIIIGHT.
I'll say it one more time, Hatton is not MUCH BIGGER than Pacquiao. How much bigger do you think Hatton is to be MUCH BIGGER than Pacquiao at 5'6 150 lbs?
And my point on Malanaggi was in regards to our discussion about body size and strength. If in fact Hatton is so big and strong he would have tossed Malanaggi's weak ass even when he was trying to clinch.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pacmanjay View Post..............................
so when a pic fits your description (a pic that appears as though Hatton has a much bigger frame) then pics are accurate, but when they don't, they aren't. RIIIGHT.
I'll say it one more time, Hatton is not MUCH BIGGER than Pacquiao. How much bigger do you think Hatton is to be MUCH BIGGER than Pacquiao at 5'6 150 lbs?
And my point on Malanaggi was in regards to our discussion about body size and strength. If in fact Hatton is so big and strong he would have tossed Malanaggi's weak ass even when he was trying to clinch.
Hatton was hitting Malignaggi all over the ring, and Malignaggi's clinching was interrupted by the referee as he was just holding onto Hatton's waist.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jching View PostStop nuthugging - that pic is not proportionate. Pictures of them together are. Get it?? I said that at the moment Hatton is looking bigger than Pac because that is the truth. What part of that don't you understand?
Hatton was hitting Malignaggi all over the ring, and Malignaggi's clinching was interrupted by the referee as he was just holding onto Hatton's waist.
I'm the nuthugger? Riiight...
Is that Kim Kardashian's sister in your sig? I think this is a easier thing to discuss with you?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pacmanjay View PostI'm the nuthugger? Riiight...
Is that Kim Kardashian's sister in your sig? I think this is a easier thing to discuss with you?
I'm stating facts and you think i'm nuthugging?
Comment
Comment