Toney was a beast at 160 and 168. it would be LIGHTS OUT for Calzaghe
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
toney versus calzaghe at 168
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by S a m u r a i View PostWith all due respect, who doesn't have problems landing on Hopkins?
Watch the Michael nunn fight at 160 i think, and see all the jabs and right hands toney dodged before knocking him out savagely, and thats when he was about 23 years old and some considered nunn the p4p no 1 in the sport.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Technical_Skill View PostNot as funny as your post on Joe beating up toney like Lacy, when toney went the distance and boxed with heavyweight punchers.
Joe could go on laxatives for a week and you'd still be in his ass.
Shameful.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by S a m u r a i View PostHis limitations are broken hands, which means he can't punch like he used to for fear of smashing them. That's it. Otherwise Joe got great skills.
How do you explain his totally ****ty defense and weak as hell chin?
Does his hands effect that too.
Comment
-
Toney has fought a southpaw that hits harder than Calzaghe, throws more punches than him, is bigger and has a better body attack than Calzaghe.
Toney has also fought someone with a better jab and better outboxing skill than Calzaghe, and just as fast as Calzaghe.
both of them tasted the canvas by the end of the fight, one of them didnt get up.
Toney on a good night would land too many counter right hands on Calzaghe. Toney by decision, losing some early and middle rounds, but ending up winning 116-112ish.
Toney had his bad nights, but so did Calzaghe. I mean, if you took the Calzaghe from the Kabaray Salem fight and faced him against the worst version of Toney, Calzaghe would probebly lose.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Testdead View PostThat is just ******.
What on earth has Toney done to be mentioned in Mayweathers league?
I find it an insult that some-one needs to add a poll on how badly he loses to Calzaghe.
Comment
Comment