Whats worse - Shortening the ring by 4 feet or making Haye have two rematch clauses??

[-Swizzy-]

neither are as bad as haye continually *****ing out after talking so much trash for so long and refusing to sign the contract. what a *****.

yet another klit nut-hugger post. creating lies.

[ИATAS]

Can i ask the thread starter where he seen the contract and if he would be kind enough to show it to us? These are probably just rumors made up by someone in haye's camp. This fight just needs to be made, *** this garbage division full of garbage fighters and fights. Yes that includes the klitscho's. Haye and arreola are what this division needs.

oh yeah it was a rumor, haha! search the forum it's common knowledge, reported by many sources.

[-Antonio-]

Two rematch clauses? That's some ***** ****.

[BattlingNelson]

Rematchclauses are really just hard-ball negotiating. Although it might be a first (which I dont know if it is) I cannot see anything wrong with using the leverage you have when you are negotiating fights.

I don't like the ringsize issue. It's a sport and rules are rules. I'm glad that Gomez handlers found out. They just might be good people in terms of lokking after their man (and shady in anything else).

[P4P Opinion]

Assuming both claims are accurate, I find it hard to decide.

On the one hand, having a ring too small by four feet is unbelievably unprofessional, but on the other, asking for two rematch clauses is ridiculous. One rematch clause is fine, but asking for two is a bit of a ***** move. Does the Klitschko camp really want the Haye fight or not?

[Pullcounter]

So the Klitschko bro's are starting to look pretty damn shady after all.

First, you have the BS problems with David Haye - making the contract so that there are TWO rematch clauses so even if Haye were to win he would have to fight Wlad OR his brother Vitali two more times, haha (amongst many other things w/the contract). I mean seriously, when was the last time you heard of two rematches in a contract that included a DIFFERENT fighter?? That's just absurd.

Now we got Vitali shortening the ring by 4 FEET (that's 4 feet smaller than WBC rules would allow).

both are reasons why you dont fight in germany

[ACHlLLES]

Why would Wlad need two rematch clauses when he is going to KO david haye anyways. David Haye is a tiny heavyweight who has been beaten and hurt by natural supermiddle weights.

[Joeyzagz]

Lennox did the right thing by not giving these Jerks the time of day after defending his belt.

Lennox will always be the one guy they couldnt **** over, in the ring or on the negotiating table.

[ИATAS]

Why would Wlad need two rematch clauses when he is going to KO david haye anyways. David Haye is a tiny heavyweight who has been beaten and hurt by natural supermiddle weights.

right, you would think that would be the mentality going into the fight - very confident. A rematch clause if fine, especially if you're a champ like Wlad. But two rematch clauses, with the possibility of one of those rematches NOT even being the man you beat (Wlad) is crazy!

Then on top of that, if Haye beats Wlad and has a mandatory fight to defend his belt, Haye CANNOT take that fight first, which means he could be stripped of the belt(s). So that would mean in theory david haye could beat the Klitschko's a total of THREE times and still not be champion!

[PBDS]

Can i ask the thread starter where he seen the contract and if he would be kind enough to show it to us? These are probably just rumors made up by someone in haye's camp. This fight just needs to be made, *** this garbage division full of garbage fighters and fights. Yes that includes the klitscho's. Haye and arreola are what this division needs.

...I put you back in the green for this post.