Originally posted by GRUSTLER
View Post
Hey Man,
You're obviously bent on defending your man.
You can some up everything you've said into you're one main statement above. You said: "Why would Floyd have to prove he is the best when he was the the best?"
...your point centers around that main statement.
I understand what it is to be of fan of someone. But the moment you think you're fighter has nothing left to prove, he must've fought all the best of his day. Is that what you believe?
Either that, or What? 'he doesn't have to'? Is that your answer?
Comment