Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why do people act like fights dont need to happens because....

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #1

    Why do people act like fights dont need to happens because....

    Why do people act like fights dont need to happens because they believe fighter A would beat fighter B? even though!! they have never seen them fight. If they are so good at predicting the winner of a fights, then how come they did'nt put money on Forrest to beat Mosley? etc etc.

    Facts are you dont know what is going to happen untill they get in the ring. Granted there are times when you can say be realistic and say this guy will not beat that guy because he is a c class fighter, but when you are talking about two elite fighters, its much harder to predict the outcome and people who dismiss their chances are crazy. Bordering on ******.
    Last edited by P4P GOAT; 03-07-2009, 12:51 PM.
    #2
    douglas was a mandotory,and so was forrest to mosley..those fights HAD to happen

    Comment

      #3
      People are closed minded.

      Comment

        #4
        Because then BoxingScene would be boring

        Comment

          #5
          Originally posted by larryx View Post
          douglas was a mandotory,and so was forrest to mosley..those fights HAD to happen
          Thats not the point. They were not favoured to beat either.

          Comment

            #6
            News flash Leonard and Duran were supposed to get destroyed against Hagler. Duran lost a SD. Leonard beat his ass. Yet Hagler had been in their with Tony Sibson a guy who looked more like a CW than a MW and Sibson couldn't even make it to the last round like the much smaller Duran. As a matter of fact Hagler fought a lot of guys that were probably natural 175lbs and none them came close to beating him like Duran did.

            BTW Duran fought a prime Hagler, Mugabi did not.

            Skills are overlooked way too much in favour of size.
            Last edited by P4P GOAT; 03-07-2009, 12:58 PM.

            Comment

              #7
              I take it this is about Mayweather v Marquez. And all I'm going to say is you must really hate Marquez to want to see him in this fight. Mayweather is more skilled and bigger, so do the math. If Marquez had trouble with Casamayor, you really think he is going to last long against Mayweather?

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by DiegoFuego View Post
                I take it this is about Mayweather v Marquez. And all I'm going to say is you must really hate Marquez to want to see him in this fight. Mayweather is more skilled and bigger, so do the math. If Marquez had trouble with Casamayor, you really think he is going to last long against Mayweather?
                no, he's talking about Mayweather vs. anyone 147 to 154.

                Comment

                  #9
                  Originally posted by DiegoFuego View Post
                  I take it this is about Mayweather v Marquez. And all I'm going to say is you must really hate Marquez to want to see him in this fight. Mayweather is more skilled and bigger, so do the math. If Marquez had trouble with Casamayor, you really think he is going to last long against Mayweather?


                  Mayweather had trouble with Castillo and an out of prime DLH. Also Castillo did not beat Casamayor imo. You are the typical of the kind of person im talking about.

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Originally posted by 2501 View Post
                    no, he's talking about Mayweather vs. anyone 147 to 154.
                    .........Exactly.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP