Latest Ring Mag P4P (as of 3/1/2009): Pac still #1, JMM #2

[SuckaPunch]

Latest Ring Magazine P4P Ratings (as of Sunday, 3/1/2009)



1. Pac
2. JMM
3. Bhop
4. Izzy
5. Shane
6. Rafa
7. Calderon
8. Hatton
9. Caballero
10. Darchinyan

[Ishy Aytan]

yep, definetly think thats fair.

[street bully]

Seems ok other than Hatton at 8. Hatton in all honesty shouldn't be on the P4P list. I would have Cotto in his place somewhere around 9 or 10.

[Gojira]

Seems ok other than Hatton at 8. Hatton in all honesty shouldn't be on the P4P list. I would have Cotto in his place somewhere around 9 or 10.

Why? because he beat jennings?

[2501]

Dont' agree with Hatton being on the P4P list, but yeah. As a Marquez fan, the win over Marquez and DLH for Pac puts him SLIGHTLY, SLIGHTLY above Marquez.

[Joe2608]

It started off good but from 6-10 it gets a bit silly.

[S A M U R A I]

I don't have Hatton at #8 either. I'm struggling to find a great win from him in the last few years. Does beating Lazcano and Malignaggi make you #8 P4P? I don't think it should.

Pac is still #1 in my opinion. Marquez second.



| |

[UnderPressure]

Nice to see Darchinyan chime in on the P4P list. This is why I've been wanting Donaire to fight him again. It would be a step-up to be one of the best. The problem is Vic isn't as hungry as Marquez is for a rematch against Pacquiao.

**** you, Shaw.

[street bully]

Why? because he beat jennings?

No, because Cotto is a better fighter than Hatton, and actually has skills. Who has Hatton beat Lazcanzo? Malignaggi?

[ИATAS]

Good list. Probably swap Darchinyan with Hatton.