Remember JMM when he turned down Pac and lost to John. Pac will lose to Valero for peanuts too.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pacquiao-Valero on Deck if Ricky Hatton Walks Away
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Chups View PostRemember JMM when he turned down Pac and lost to John. Pac will lose to Valero for peanuts too.
That and making $2 million to fight Valero.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mangler View PostSeems ******, but the $ thing gets way too much play on here. I don't give a **** what these guys make as long as they have good fights. Pac-Valero should be good, so let's do it.
Comment
-
i really hope this is just for leverage . . . but at the same time i dont think pac deserves the 60-40 split. i think 55-45 is more then fair.
if the fight doesnt come off i'll loose a ton of respect for manny, the valero fight may be interesting. but i have not bought into the valero hype, he may have power but hes fought no one and has terrible form. i would rather see him unify at lightweight fight the winner of jmm diaz and nate fuenka.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 3zilla View Posti have not bought into the valero hype, he may have power but hes fought no one and has terrible form
Regarding the comments about him being limited, that's exactly what everyone said about George Foreman until he beat Frazier. Foreman was limited, but his power made up for that, and it was enough to get him into the Hall of Fame.
Comment
-
This is lame on pacquiao's part. If he isn't gonna fight hatton a third fight with jmm makes more sense. He'll get more money and everyone knows they always put up a great fight (plus it would be for the lineal championship). Who the hell is valero and who has he fought? Just cause he's undefeated doesn't mean ****. I seriously don't know what the **** this guy is thinking.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dave Rado View PostHe has fought no-one because no-one will fight him. He has been The Ring's #1-rated Jnr. Lightweight for quite a long time, but none of the other leading Jnr. Lightweights or Lightweights have been willing to fight him. You can't blame Valero for that! If they thought he would be so easy, why are they all avoiding him? And I don't believe The Ring's ratings are based just on hype, they are compiled by a panel of highly respected boxing experts.
Regarding the comments about him being limited, that's exactly what everyone said about George Foreman until he beat Frazier. Foreman was limited, but his power made up for that, and it was enough to get him into the Hall of Fame.
when was he #1 at 130?
#1 over pacquiao? over marquez? over morales? over barrera? over guzman?
when was he #1? a few months ago with morales and barrera retired and after pacquiao , guzman and marquez all jumped up to 135.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Postwhen was he #1? a few months ago with morales and barrera retired and after pacquiao , guzman and marquez all jumped up to 135.
Comment
Comment