<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Honestly.....I dont think Pacman thinks he can beat Hatton at 140.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #71
    I love reading this kind of thread, it was classic. LOL. Where's burner?

    Comment

      #72
      Originally posted by HM_Luke View Post
      Hatton wasn't 44-0, he lost to Mayweather remember? The Pauli which fought Hatton wasn't the best Pauli imo.

      Graham said that after the Collazo fight he noticed Ricky wasn't the same fighter.
      Gayweather made Hatton move up to 147.

      Pac fought Hatton at his best weight.

      End of story.

      Comment

        #73
        Burner another thread of yours? lolz. keep it up Burner.. lolz..

        Comment

          #74
          god damnit you suck burner.

          Comment

            #75
            Originally posted by joartcc5 View Post
            Gayweather made Hatton move up to 147.

            Pac fought Hatton at his best weight.

            End of story.
            Hatton wasn't the same fighter after the loss to Mayweather.

            And I'm a Hatton fan ffs.

            Comment

              #76
              Originally posted by HM_Luke View Post
              Hatton wasn't the same fighter after the loss to Mayweather.

              And I'm a Hatton fan ffs.
              Really? what was Hatton during Mayweather's fight and what was Hatton during Pacquiao's fight. What was lucking during the Manny fight?

              Comment

                #77
                Originally posted by alexpz View Post
                Really? what was Hatton during Mayweather's fight and what was Hatton during Pacquiao's fight. What was lucking during the Manny fight?
                Hatton had never been ko'd. You know some fighters are never the same and it's clear Hatton wasn't. He had a tough time against Collazo and people can't hide the facts just because he beat Pauli who wasn't good that night at all.

                It wasn't luck. It was a terrible mismatch for Hatton but at the same time he wasn't at his best condition.

                Comment

                  #78
                  Originally posted by HM_Luke View Post
                  Hatton wasn't 44-0, he lost to Mayweather remember? The Pauli which fought Hatton wasn't the best Pauli imo.

                  Graham said that after the Collazo fight he noticed Ricky wasn't the same fighter.
                  Hatton was undefeated at 140, where he was the king.

                  Comment

                    #79
                    Burner made excuses after Pac flattened Hatton. Now he is making excuses for the Cotto fight, he isn't a fan of boxing.

                    Comment

                      #80
                      Originally posted by rabad View Post
                      Hatton was undefeated at 140, where he was the king.
                      That's not my point.

                      Hatton was never the same after being KO'd by Floyd. Shame but it is true..

                      Not discrediting Manny's win. Because i don't think many guys at LWW could of beat him. Manny had the perfect style to beat Hatton though.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP