A Win over Margarito,Cotto,Mosely, & Clottey are Better Than A MAYWEATHER WIN @ WW???

[Horus]

The Haters in General, have a real **** up Logic..that they even know works against them

According to the boards:
1. Floyd never fought any good welterweight.
2. Floyd wasnt a impressive welterweight champion because he didnt look impressive At the weight and was boring and didnt fight nobody.
3. Ricky Hatton is a great win at 140 and a terrible win at 147.
4. Ricky Hatton wasn't a real Welterweight Champion because he didnt look impressive when he won his title.

• So Commonsense would lead you to believe listening to some of these people on here, that Floyd's Run at Welterweight just like Ricky Hatton's wasnt impressive....Because they never fought anybody....

SAY THIS IS TRUE..!!!!

If Floyd wasnt a impressive welterweight champion because he never fought any good welterweights....

What does a Floyd win at welterweight mean for a fighter like (Margarito,Cotto,Mosely,Berto,Clottey) if he wasnt impressive at welterweight???


What does a win over a fighter who wasnt impressive at Welterweight Means?

• Does it mean you beat a mediocre Welterweight?
• Does it mean you beat a fighter who didnt belong at Welterweight because most of his career was at 135 and under?
• Does it mean you beat a fighter who never was impreesive at Welterweight anyways?

Then Why would someone fight floyd at welterweight if he was a mediocre Welterweight according to some of you guys...??

• Why not Fight a career welterweight like Margarito, Cotto, Williams, Clottey, etc.

According to the logic.

• a win over Williams should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
• a win over Cotto should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
• a win over Margarito should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
• a win over Mosely should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
• a win over Clottey should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.

Because they are all career welterweights and resumes more impressive then
Floyds at Welterweight.

• Why not fight Floyd at 135? <<< he was the man in this division
• Why not fight Floyd at 130? <<< he was the man in this division
• Why not fight Floyd at 140? <<< he was ducked in this division

Why fight Floyd at welterweight if he was no good there???

• Margarito walks around at 180+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
• Cotto walks around at 160+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
• Clottey walks around at 180+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
• Williams walks around at 170+ pounds and he fights at Welterweight
• Hatton walks around at 180+ pounds and he fights at Jr. Welterweight

Floyd walks around at 150, and so you cant say he cant fight at Jr.Lightweight, Lightweight, and Junior Welterweight.....

If Margarito, Cotto, Williams, Clottey, and Hatton can walk around at 20-40 pounds above there fighting weight and still fight at their divisions...I think Floyd can do the same....

According to the logic on NSB, My Question is What does a win over a fighter who wasnt impressive at Welterweight Means?

[Horus]

I see the Majority of the board for a while now using this line,
Ricky Hatton wasnt a great win for Floyd because he wasnt fighting Floyd at his best weight which is 140.????

My Response:
Ricky Hatton was a WBA welter Weight Champion am I wrong???

The Haters on NSB Response:
Well Ricky Hatton Wasnt Impressive at Welterweight.

My Response:
I didn't know you had to look impressive in winning a championship belt in order to be taken seriously as a champion...I thought if you beat the champion for his belt then you are a champion???
By that Standard how many champions can we say are not real champions because they didnt look impressive when they won their belts???


The Haters on NSB Response:
Ricky Hatton is a Junior Welterweight because he fought most of his career there, Floyd should have fought a real welterweight or fought Ricky Hatton at 140..!!

My Response:
But Floyd has had 39 Fights in which
31 fights were at 135 and under.
Only 8 Fights were at 140 and up.

Ricky Hatton had more fights at 140 AND UP then Floyd did...
Both Floyd and Ricky Hatton were Welter Weight Champions.

Floyd started at 130
Ricky Started at 140

[ANDROID_DOES]

all i did was skim through your **** and hit reply. If i wanted to read a ***en novel i'd pick up a book. If i actually wanted to sit down and read a ****zine, I read something done done by writers. No one really reads through **** try again. Sum it up! good writters can sum things up withough having to highlight, underline, center, bold, color **** to make sure a reader sees a certain word.

[Horus]

all i did was skim through your **** and hit reply. If i wanted to read a ***en novel i'd pick up a book. If i actually wanted to sit down and read a ****zine, I read something done done by writers. No one really reads through **** try again. Sum it up! good writters can sum things up withough having to highlight, underline, center, bold, color **** to make sure a reader sees a certain word.

What does a win over a fighter who wasnt impressive at Welterweight Means?

[C.Y.]

Be prepared to get hated on...

[Horus]

Be prepared to get hated on...

Why would I get Hated on for this thread....I am just using their logic to let them answer a question....

What does a win over a fighter who wasnt impressive at Welterweight Means?

[C.Y.]

Logic is something haters don't use.. they just use hate as their fuel to start arguments.. plus most fools assume if you're a fan of floyd mayweather then you're automatically a fanboy or something

[Silencers]

A win over Mayweather would be very good at 147 for any fighter, he was the man in the division, he was pound for pound number 1 and he was impressive in his performances at the weight but his level of competition at the weight wasn't the best, it doesn't change the fact that he was the man and was considered the best fighter on the planet though so a win would have meant.

And I don't think Mayweather can make 135 anymore without affecting himself, he can definitely fight at 140 though.

[Horus]

A win over Mayweather would be very good at 147 for any fighter, he was the man in the division, he was pound for pound number 1 and he was impressive in his performances at the weight but his level of competition at the weight wasn't the best, it doesn't change the fact that he was the man and was considered the best fighter on the planet though so a win would have meant.

And I don't think Mayweather can make 135 anymore without affecting himself, he can definitely fight at 140 though.

According to the logic.

• a win over Williams should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
• a win over Cotto should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
• a win over Margarito should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
• a win over Mosely should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.
• a win over Clottey should be more impressive than a win over Floyd.

Because they are all career welterweights and resumes more impressive then
Floyds at Welterweight.


So why would a win over floyd would be better than a Win over Margarito at WW. If Margarito resume is better than Floyds and Floyd didnt fight nobody?


"And I don't think Mayweather can make 135 anymore without affecting himself, he can definitely fight at 140 though."

Floyd walks around at 150, and so you cant say he cant fight at Jr.Lightweight, Lightweight, and Junior Welterweight.....

If Margarito, Cotto, Williams, Clottey, and Hatton can walk around at 20-40 pounds above there fighting weight and still fight at their divisions...I think Floyd can do the same....

[sterling]

lol i jus feel like tellin horus to shut up for some reason hmm i wonder why?