People are ****ting on Margarito for taking this fight. This is for conversation's sake.
Who is a bigger risk of a fight? Shane Mosley today or Carlos Baldomir of 2006?
Shane Mosley nearly beat prime cotto and knocked out Mayorga and Vargas.
Baldomir beat Zab Judah and a shot to hell Arturo Gatti.
The only difference between the two fighters is that Baldomir had the "ring" belt. So according to many people, that title automatically makes a fighter much more worthy and riskier a fight.
People say Mayweather took that fight to propel himself into money fights which he got against De La Hoya and Hatton. Mayweather fans defend this and say it was all business.
As a Margarito fan why cant i do the same? Could it be possible that taking this fight against Mosley could be a way to propel himself to the money fights against Cotto in a rematch or De La Hoya? What makes this situation different from Mayweather?
Who is a bigger risk of a fight? Shane Mosley today or Carlos Baldomir of 2006?
Shane Mosley nearly beat prime cotto and knocked out Mayorga and Vargas.
Baldomir beat Zab Judah and a shot to hell Arturo Gatti.
The only difference between the two fighters is that Baldomir had the "ring" belt. So according to many people, that title automatically makes a fighter much more worthy and riskier a fight.
People say Mayweather took that fight to propel himself into money fights which he got against De La Hoya and Hatton. Mayweather fans defend this and say it was all business.
As a Margarito fan why cant i do the same? Could it be possible that taking this fight against Mosley could be a way to propel himself to the money fights against Cotto in a rematch or De La Hoya? What makes this situation different from Mayweather?
Comment