Probably 1st or 2nd best 130 pounder in history - its between him and Arguello. Where he is all time p4p wise its hard to say. I personally see him as being around the 25 mark. I'm prob biased though as I am, to use Scott's term, a ********ual.
Agreed. He is in the top fifty. The funny thing about him is he never really dominated one division for any length of time so I can't say he is one of the best in 130, 140 etc etc. He was never in any division long enough to show true dominance.
Anyway, do you mean (thread starter) one of the best, as in top ten, or just one of the best in general ie. top 50/100?
Comment