Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Marquez would easily dispose of Nate Campbell

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    I dont care who wins but I want to watch it. Both guys are tough and capable of winning.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by The_Italian View Post
      i think JMM beats campbell quite easily.

      its not that im a campbell hater or a JMM nuthugger or anything of the sort.

      I think the reality is that campbell got lucky against Juan Diaz and now all of the sudden he gets brought into question when talking about megafights and i dont think he's at that level.

      i would even say diaz beats him in a rematch.

      and lets face it JMM is one of, if not arguably THEE best fighter at lightweight.
      Campbell didn't get lucky against Diaz. I fail to see how standing in the pocket and beating your opponent at his own game is getting lucky.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by -Antonio- View Post
        Campbell didn't get lucky against Diaz. I fail to see how standing in the pocket and beating your opponent at his own game is getting lucky.
        Thank you for pointing out how ****** that logic is.

        Comment


          #44
          Diaz had a bad night thats all he couldnt get off his punches .

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by Puas View Post
            You guys keep focusing on "it won't be easy" or the "triangle theory" but what you all are avoiding is the fact that Juan Manuel Marquez would defeat Nate Campbell. You all are trying to create arguments while avoiding the main topic of the thread: JMM beats Campbell. Now argue that.
            Hey genius you are the one who posted and named the title of this thread "Marquez would easily dispose of Nate Campbell". Idiot.
            Last edited by Zocalo; 09-17-2008, 11:45 AM.

            Comment


              #46
              I can’t believe some people still believe in that theory…its been ****ted on and disproven numerous times

              Comment


                #47
                Nate fights mandatory's. That pretty much ends there. So first to become mandatory(right now, Diaz is ahead), will get a shot at campbell. I see Diaz, jmm (and maybe Breidis''khan-killer''Prescott maybe?) beating Nate.

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by Adaptation View Post
                  Nate fights mandatory's. That pretty much ends there. So first to become mandatory(right now, Diaz is ahead), will get a shot at campbell. I see Diaz, jmm (and maybe Breidis''khan-killer''Prescott maybe?) beating Nate.
                  Same here.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by Sonic Flood View Post
                    Another Triangle Theory?

                    You're hate for Nate is just too much.. I'd rather pretend not being a Diaz or JMM fan so it wont be bias. L0l
                    yes, triangle theories do not have any validity to them. they have been proven wrong time and time again. i would love to see marquez vs. campbell though!! what a great fight that would be. weather you like nate o not, he will fight anybody and i'm sure he will fight marquez when the time is right.

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by Zocalo View Post
                      Hey genius you are the one who posted and named the title of this thread "Marquez would easily dispose of Nate Campbell". Idiot.
                      You guys can't argue against my statement that JMM would beat Fake Campbell so you attack the "easily" part of the thread topic. Children.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP