Is there a need for Forrest/Mora III?

[2501 v2.0]

Mora was able to slide with a win against a visibly different Forrest in their first fight. Forrest came back looking healthy and alive in the second punishing Mora even taking him down once. Was the rematch the indicator of who is the best fighter? Or should there be a rubber match to settle it?

[KnockoutTheFat]

If you think there's a need for Quintana-Williams III then there's a need for Forrest-Mora III. Actually if you think about it, Williams should fight Quintana again anyway since nobody else wants to fight him.

[AztecWanker]

nah, forrest proved he had an off night the first time, and beat that ass propa in the rematch.

[Avenue]

i would drink a bottle of Tylenol if this **** happens again

[Murray]

As much as I like boxing for some reason I didnt watch either of these fights.
And since Im normally anti-rematch unless they are like Gatti-Ward or Marquez vs Vazquez I say no.

[2501 v2.0]

If you think there's a need for Quintana-Williams III then there's a need for Forrest-Mora III. Actually if you think about it, Williams should fight Quintana again anyway since nobody else wants to fight him.

The difference in these fights is that Quintana schooled Williams in their first, Mora barely edged out a win against Forrest.

[Zocalo]

For the good of the sport... we don't need crapful trilogies.

[Dan...]

Only if Mora wants to embarress himself again. That man is not on Vernon's level.

[T-97]

As much as I like boxing for some reason I didnt watch either of these fights.
And since Im normally anti-rematch unless they are like Gatti-Ward or Marquez vs Vazquez I say no.

Dude that sig is ****in' hilarious

For the good of the sport... we don't need crapful trilogies.

Could be a good show for the insomniacs though..

[egreezy]

Paul Williams vs Vernon Forrest makes sense though more then any trilogy