Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

****ing HILARIOUS How Some Pac Fans Are Thowing The "Age" Excuse To Discredit JMM Win

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    pacquiao fans are very ignorant. pacquiao is a good fighter but he cannot beat an elite mexican in his prime. he lost to morales in his prime and he lost twice to prime jmm. jmm is just a much better fighter than him and they are scared to admit this fact. its just plain and basic common sense.

    Comment


      #12
      they're 2 years apart.................

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by ¡VIVA MEXICO! View Post
        pacquiao fans are very ignorant. pacquiao is a good fighter but he cannot beat an elite mexican in his prime. he lost to morales in his prime and he lost twice to prime jmm. jmm is just a much better fighter than him and they are scared to admit this fact. its just plain and basic common sense.
        first you say **** like this, then you say **** like this.shut up.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by ¡VIVA MEXICO! View Post
          pacquiao fans are very ignorant. pacquiao is a good fighter but he cannot beat an elite mexican in his prime. he lost to morales in his prime and he lost twice to prime jmm. jmm is just a much better fighter than him and they are scared to admit this fact. its just plain and basic common sense.
          He beat Barrera in his prime....

          Comment


            #15
            I swear, you Mexican nuthuggers are the the ultimate jock riders by far....

            To even assume that Morales, Berrera, JMM, were as shot (when Pac first fought them) as Casa is now is ****in ridiculous...

            Was Morales, Barerra, JMM, not on the P4P list when PAC first fought them??? NOW, where is CASA's place on the P4P list as of two days ago????You nut slobbers dont think anyone else has tvs????? Was CASA not thoroughly beaten by Santa Cruz, who got knocked out by Diaz, who PAC made look like his son????

            Just ****in imagine if PAC chose to fight CASA and knocked his ass out??? You ****s would be saying the same old ****....

            Please, take your double standards and shove them up JMMs ass... He might like it...

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by 2501 v2.0 View Post
              I mean, this are the same dudes who are always complaining bout people saying Morales and Barrera were passed their prime and now they seem so bothered by the amount of credit Marquez is getting for the win.

              You guys are running your mouths saying the win isnt **** because Casa was passed his prime? So then we can go ahead and disregard Manny's win over Morales and Barrera right? You guys wont have a problem with that...............oh but wait, if we do that, thats practically most of Pacquiao's resume.

              You guys TRULY cannot be this ******. Do you even think about what you post?

              Give JMM the credit he deserves.

              JMM, a SMALL Jr. Lightweight, moved up to 135 to CHALLENGE THE division's Lightweight Champion who just happened to be one of Boxing's most craftiest and knowledgeable figthers, who also happened to knock out one of the division's most violent and able fighters in Michael Katisidis and OUTBOX and KNOCK HIM OUT.

              I am a Pac fan as well. Chups, Shadefizzle, Left Hook Tua all can vouch for me as I have defended Pac manny a times on this forum. But you fools cant discredit Marquez's win when Manny moved up and challenged the division's WEAKEST Champion to test the waters at Lightweight.

              Dont make yourselves seem ******. JMM just earned his #2 spot behind Pacquiao.
              I agree with this and those Pacquiao fans who are doing this are ******.

              What they should do is - praise JMM for beating Casamayor because it makes Pacquiao win over him look better. You don't belittle JMM - a guy Pacquiao holds 2 victories against. That makes Pacquiao look weak since he had two close victories against him who some think he should've lost.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by ¡VIVA MEXICO! View Post
                pacquiao fans are very ignorant. pacquiao is a good fighter but he cannot beat an elite mexican in his prime. he lost to morales in his prime and he lost twice to prime jmm. jmm is just a much better fighter than him and they are scared to admit this fact. its just plain and basic common sense.
                ignorance.

                an elite fighter is an elite fighter. no matter the race.

                the fact that you said elite "mexican" makes you look ******.

                if you want to talk seriously. name a level/fighter that manny can't beat NOT the race manny can't beat.

                Comment


                  #18
                  See 2501 v2.0, read your thread and look who first threw the lowblows(¡VIVA MEXICO!)

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by nycbigdog2 View Post
                    I swear, you Mexican nuthuggers are the the ultimate jock riders by far....

                    To even assume that Morales, Berrera, JMM, were as shot (when Pac first fought them) as Casa is now is ****in ridiculous...

                    Was Morales, Barerra, JMM, not on the P4P list when PAC first fought them??? NOW, where is CASA's place on the P4P list as of two days ago????You nut slobbers dont think anyone else has tvs????? Was CASA not thoroughly beaten by Santa Cruz, who got knocked out by Diaz, who PAC made look like his son????

                    Just ****in imagine if PAC chose to fight CASA and knocked his ass out??? You ****s would be saying the same old ****....

                    Please, take your double standards and shove them up JMMs ass... He might like it...

                    Morales the second time and especially the third was more shot then Casamayor. The Morales wins are very good for Pacquiao, but Casamayor had more left in the tank then Morales those times.

                    Also Casamayor is way better then Diaz. Triangle theories don't work especially since Santa Cruz was beating his ass until he got caught and knocked out.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by warp1432 View Post
                      Morales the second time and especially the third was more shot then Casamayor. The Morales wins are very good for Pacquiao, but Casamayor had more left in the tank then Morales those times.

                      Also Casamayor is way better then Diaz. Triangle theories don't work especially since Santa Cruz was beating his ass until he got caught and knocked out.
                      Read my post again, I said the first time PAC fought MAB, EM, and JMM, they were all on the P4P list so they were nowhere near as shot as CASA is now...POINT ONE...


                      I knew someone was going to say triangle theory, BUT, in this case triangle theory doesnrt apply because you'll be hard pressed to find anyone that doesnt think PAC would beat CASA or Santa Cruz... Except the haters on this site...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP