Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Calzaghe vs. Hagler @ 168

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by daggum View Post
    i posted this earlier. this works for you perfectly.

    using calzaghe logic=hagler has 3 losses calzaghe has none. calzaghe by ko
    hmmmm no your way off the mark maggot !!!!!!!! my logic is if willie monroe and bobby watts could do it why couldnt calzaghe !!!!! hes got the chin hes got the skills and got the stamina ???????

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by fatmash View Post
      why is everyone so shocked people are votein for calzaghe hes the bigger man and quicker better boxing skills a excellenmt chin why is it so crazy to think calzaghe could win close on points ???? if the likes of bobby watts and willie monroe could beat him o on points why not calzaghe ??
      Well I haven't seen those fights but they were before Hagler hit prime weren't they?

      In my opinion, a middleweight version of Sweet Pea, or prime vs prime Ray Leonard, is a hard fight for Hagler. But that isn't Calzaghe's style.

      Thomas Hearns had an excellent jab and great power, but he couldn't stop Hagler from coming after him. Someone as good as Monzon may be able to outbox Hagler without being on the back foot all night, but, although I like Calzaghe, I don't think that he's on that level.

      As I said before, Calzaghe may be able to win a couple of rounds by using his hand speed to land and then move out of range, but I don't see him doing that for most of the rounds.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by fatmash View Post
        hmmmm no your way off the mark maggot !!!!!!!! my logic is if willie monroe and bobby watts could do it why couldnt calzaghe !!!!! hes got the chin hes got the skills and got the stamina ???????
        [IMG]//i285.***********.com/albums/ll67/barobinson1/hopcalz-1.gif?t=1218784000[/IMG]

        care to retract that statement maggot? why couldn't calzaghe beat hagler? this is why.

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by daggum View Post
          i posted this earlier. this works for you perfectly.

          using calzaghe logic=hagler has 3 losses calzaghe has none. calzaghe by ko
          Originally posted by daggum View Post
          [IMG]//i285.***********.com/albums/ll67/barobinson1/hopcalz-1.gif?t=1218784000[/IMG]

          care to retract that statement maggot? why couldn't calzaghe beat hagler? this is why.

          ermmmm let me think ....................... no how about lowzy little maggot !!!
          and what a 7 second clip from a fight with a boxer who has made a carear out of makin people look bad in the ring ............. that realie proves your point dont it lol

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by Clegg View Post
            I voted for Calzaghe by KO.

            If he hits Hagler with half of what he caught Manfredo with, Hagler's jaw won't be able to take it.
            You are basing your prediction that Joe would KO Hagler on his performance against Peter "The Pity of Providence" Manfredo? Peter "I couldn't even win The Contender Crown" Manfredo? Are you ****ing kidding me?

            EDIT: It seems that maybe you were joking...
            Last edited by dstew; 08-22-2008, 09:57 AM.

            Comment


              #76
              This is surely going to go down as a ****** post on my part but picturing the fight in my head is just laughable. I am a calzaghe fan. I enjoy his slappy fighting style and although hagler never went to 168 calzaghe would not in my opinion have what it takes to beat a prime Marvin Hagler. Calzaghe is not a pot shotter or a runner and it pretty much took a master of the "touch and go" style of boxing to beat him. Calzaghe could windmill all he wanted...he would purely and simply get the piss beat out of him. Hagler was both hard as nails and a brilliant counter-puncher in his heyday and I would pick him to beat damn near any fighter at or near middleweight. I know, I need to get off Hagler's nuts...regardless: Best middleweight ever. Calzaghe is nowhere near his greatness.

              Comment


                #77
                [QUOTE=dstew;3964597]You are basing your prediction that Joe would KO Hagler on his performance against Peter "The Pity of Providence" Manfredo? Peter "I couldn't even win The Contender Crown" Manfredo? Are you ****ing kidding me?


                He was being sarcastic dude.

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by fatmash View Post
                  ermmmm let me think ....................... no how about lowzy little maggot !!!
                  and what a 7 second clip from a fight with a boxer who has made a carear out of makin people look bad in the ring ............. that realie proves your point dont it lol
                  Was that even English? Nominate for the most ****ing worthless post of the day....

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by fatmash View Post
                    ermmmm let me think ....................... no how about lowzy little maggot !!!
                    and what a 7 second clip from a fight with a boxer who has made a carear out of makin people look bad in the ring ............. that realie proves your point dont it lol
                    hopkins didn't make calzaghe throw punches like a lil sissy girl. don't put that on him!

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by lance_uppercut View Post
                      This is surely going to go down as a ****** post on my part but picturing the fight in my head is just laughable. I am a calzaghe fan. I enjoy his slappy fighting style and although hagler never went to 168 calzaghe would not in my opinion have what it takes to beat a prime Marvin Hagler. Calzaghe is not a pot shotter or a runner and it pretty much took a master of the "touch and go" style of boxing to beat him. Calzaghe could windmill all he wanted...he would purely and simply get the piss beat out of him. Hagler was both hard as nails and a brilliant counter-puncher in his heyday and I would pick him to beat damn near any fighter at or near middleweight. I know, I need to get off Hagler's nuts...regardless: Best middleweight ever. Calzaghe is nowhere near his greatness.
                      thanks for being reasonable. i enjoy his slappy fighting style too cause its so funny and worthless. calzaghes style cannot beat haglers.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP