Williams has a longer reach than most heavyweights at 81", and that gives him a big advantage over the welterweights. But based on 2008 performances, Margarito is clearly the best.
Williams has a longer reach than most heavyweights at 81", and that gives him a big advantage over the welterweights. But based on 2008 performances, Margarito is clearly the best.
1. Margarito
2. Cotto
3. Williams
Performance??? If There were a WW that beat Mayweather, Mayweather wouldn't be consider the best WW. Only Margarito, Only Margarito...
There is no best Welter now. It is a scrum..........
Seriously Margarito claimed he beat Williams on fight night if he wants to be the real champion of Welter he needs to go prove that Paul Williams is not the better fighter. Until he proves this or Paul Williams disapeers his claim is weak at best.
how can you say Paul Williams caught Margarito on an off night, then use his loss against Quintana against him when he's actually avenged his loss and proved it was an off-night... something which Margarito hasn't done and as far as we know atm, has no intention of doing...
i gotta say it's Paul Williams by default, seeing as he actually beat Margarito
I agree. I can't call Margo the best in the division until he beats Williams. Williams did prove that he had an off night: 12 rd decision compared to a 1st round annihilation
Williams has a longer reach than most heavyweights at 81", and that gives him a big advantage over the welterweights. But based on 2008 performances, Margarito is clearly the best.
1. Margarito
2. Cotto
3. Williams
so you're going to discredit Williams because of his reach? C'mon man. And why would you just base it on 2008 performances? And for the record although I'm a fan of Cotto why would you rank him above Williams after getting brutaly tko'd?!? Williams clearly beat Margarito, so I can't consider him better until he proves otherwise
Comment