chavez jr. fight stream link

[STEELHEAD]

YEAHHHHH chavez gets decision againt vanda ranked 122
yeahhh glad he stepped it up. whats next???
fighting someone ranked lower than 100!!! i hope i hope.

A super fight with Pavlik is in order.

i'd like to see jr go up against vanes martirosyan who has half the fights as jr.

[raabd]

dont be surprised if delahoya announces his last fight will be vs chavez jr after what we watched

People have their opinions about odlh but he's always fought the best. He'll fight the winner of cotto/marg.

[El Dominicano]

So I take it Chavez was unimpressive? He'll lose once he steps up, Vanda was a slight step up and Chavez almost lost apparently.

What was ur score silencers? I'll admit Chavez was doing O.K early on but blew it.

[rmz]

I don't get why people are calling this robbery! It was a close fight that involved JCC Jr. winning the first 5 round easily and the two fighters batteling out the next five with Vanda taking an edge on the last five. In the end a score of 97-93 is acceptable. 100-90 is ridiculous, but the winner is still the right winner. And just to clarify, I am not a big fan of JCC jr. at all.

[Run]

There goes again your reasoning. Now, in order for it to be a robbery, Chávez or the promoters must have looked for, not one, but THREE judges, or payed off not one, but THREE judges. Of course, because, you know, having AT LEAST one judge in your pocket doesn't count for anything. Perfectly legal, ethical, and of course, it isn't a robbery unless the three of them are bought/biased.

Do you know how ridiculous it is, for me to sit here on the other end of our convo and somehow be forcefed the idea of foul play?

I don't know for a fact the judges were paid off. Sure it's ****ing possible and that decision has already been perceived as home cooked.

But if I stated: "Oh you're right those judges were bought" I'd be lying to myself because I just think that one judge was a jackass.

I mean I've seen as strange or stranger score totals before.



| |

[dog1dog2]

If every judge scored it 100-90 in favor of Chavez, we'd have a discussion.

As it stands it was a split decision where 1 judge scored it for Vanda.

Go ahead and slow down on the booze, I don't wanna hear conspiracy.

I won't dispute the outcome, but I will strongly disagree with your (lack of) logic here. While it's true that "in the final outcome" it does not matter if a judge had it 96-94 or 100-90, the fact that a judge blatantly scored a fight incorrectly IS noteworthy, and certainly worth discussing/investigating. Doesn't necessarily mean that the loser got "robbed," but it could still be an indication of a "fix." Can you decipher the subtle difference there?

A judge can be in the tank for a fighter, and that fighter still might happen to win straight up.

[Scott9945]

i'd like to see jr go up against vanes martirosyan who has half the fights as jr.

Vanes would box his ears off.

[el malo]

People have their opinions about odlh but he's always fought the best. He'll fight the winner of cotto/marg.

i agree he does fight the best and i think he will fight cotto/marg but now i think this chavez jr. fight could get delahoya's attention

[Silencers]

What was ur score silencers? I'll admit Chavez was doing O.K early on but blew it.

I wasn't watching, judging from most people's reaction here, Chavez didn't look good.

[Run]

Also if you were to claim he penciled in the scores ahead of time and had to go back and erase them once he saw Chavez **** up, I'd say that's feasible.

Bought yeah but I mean that judge probably was thinking about Surfing.



| |