Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nate Campbell: "After Guzman, It's Pacquiao or Funeka"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #51
    Originally posted by Michelle21 View Post
    Pac vs Nate is war... but i dont see Nate stopping Pac.. he cant even stop a one-eyed Juan Diaz..
    33 other guys couldnt stop Diaz either. Pac however has already been stopped twice. I don't think its a reach to think that Nate could stop Pac, or that Pac could stop Nate. Although I would prefer the first choice over the second one........lol

    Comment

      #52
      Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
      Maybe so. Or maybe you have amnesia that Pac was KTFO by a guy Arce stretched in ONE ROUND, and Pac also was KTFO by a guy 11-4-4 with only 5 ko's. You like to forget about that **** though dont you? lol

      And Peden didnt knock out Nate twice. The second fight was a bs stoppage on cuts. If you actually watched the fight before thinking you know everything, then you wouldnt look like an idiot so often.

      Remember, it's much better to remain silent and be THOUGHT a moron, then to post and remove all doubt.
      L0l.. What a delusional moron.. Campbell is an idiot thinking he could handle the punch? Yeah you put up a lot of excuses.. Pathetic Loser.. you're making an excuse of Campbell being knockout by Peden and lost to Francisco Lorenzo..
      You even don't know the story when Pac got knockout when he was 16 years old? L0l.. Yeah you're right Pac got knockout at Flyweight and you don't know the story behind it so better shut up but no one could even put him down from 118-135 even a knockdown....

      Campbell's Losses were all legitimate and he got knock the **** out several times..
      Last edited by MakeDamnSure; 07-08-2008, 04:51 AM.

      Comment

        #53
        Originally posted by MakeDamnSure View Post

        Campbell's Losses were all legitimate and he got knock the **** out several times..

        he got knocked out SEVERAL TIMES??? lol. I must have missed that. maybe you just dreamed it. lol moron.

        Comment

          #54
          campbell is a fluke ima laugh when he loses to guzman

          Comment

            #55
            Originally posted by OnePunch View Post



            he got knocked out SEVERAL TIMES??? lol. I must have missed that. maybe you just dreamed it. lol moron.
            L0l Just try your best..... Internet is only the exposure of Campbell.. Pathetic loser
            Guzman gonna make it 6 losses for Campbell. LMAO
            Last edited by MakeDamnSure; 07-08-2008, 05:48 AM.

            Comment

              #56
              Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
              well, it's obviously impossible for me to be objective. Let me just say this:

              When Nate has a level playing field, and has everything he needs as far as training camp, sparring, money, etc., (as he did in the Diaz fight), then NOBODY at 135 beats him. And that includes Pac. I would see Nate stopping Pac around 6 or 7, but maybe earlier if Pac elected to stay inside and trade with Nate.


              Good luck with your analysis...

              Comment

                #57
                Originally posted by boofdatruth View Post
                Anyone who thinks everyone in the top 10 destroys Valero has never boxed pro. It is an armchair comment trying to sound like they are in the know,a dn trying to sound a bit harsh. Valero can actually sit down and move around. Freitas was scared to do that.


                How about a little sweat bet then if Pacquiao/Valero gets inked, we can go paypal...

                Comment

                  #58
                  Originally posted by v.cassiusali@ya View Post
                  it would be great seeing nate fighting pac for unified titles but it would seem impossible. nate's name was not even considered by arum as a possible opponent for pac. beside, hatton is too much to be ignored considering the millions pacman would get after disposing of valero.

                  arum is getting clever these days. he wanted valero to fight pac instead of the tested lightweights because the risk of pacquiao losing to valero is nil.


                  Don't say that out loud, boof (and he said he knows boxing! lol) might near you, he'll be over your ass!

                  Comment

                    #59
                    Originally posted by gopi11 View Post
                    Don't say that out loud, boof (and he said he knows boxing! lol) might near you, he'll be over your ass!
                    he might put your ass on ignore

                    Comment

                      #60
                      Originally posted by wakwak View Post
                      he might put your ass on ignore


                      He already did and I really don't care. He's a wimp...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP