Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
aARE AMERICANS NOT ASHAMED OF SOME OF THE CHILDREN ON HERE!!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Terrible... View Postit sounds pretty dumb to me ,i know we will invent a game where the ball hardly ever comes into contact with your foot and call it Football & we will allow head high tackles but u have got to padded up like the marshmallow
man so u dont get hurt oh yeah u got do all this in a pair of jodhpurs
dumb as **** or what only Americans could make dodge ball into a real game cause the rest of the world aint ****** enoughOriginally posted by Clegg View PostIn point 11 you criticise a dislike of a religious minority, in point 12 you exhibit a dislike of a religious minority. Nice one.
Comment
-
Man you can't hide the name on that ****, that's possibly the dumbest thing I've read in a long time. It just astounds me into a deep state of perplexion sometimes, it really does. lol.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevbutler View PostAmerican football players hit harder than Rugby, thats why they wear pads.
Tell me that a player that looks like this.
Doesnt hit harder than these guys.
I know soccer is the biggest sport in the world, I guess crying relates to a lot of people. As a matter of fact the game I watched was the one in your sig. How many american football players you see miss a game winning touchdown and then cry on camera for 30min?
Hey, we won the game! Now lets frollik around and cry on national TV for 30 min.
Comment
-
Originally posted by adamk1304 View PostYou clearly don't watch either rugby or real football. Sure there are alot of small guys that play rugby but the majority are 6 ft + and can dish out just as much as your padded heroes. There is alot of play acting/ diving/ ******* in football but the majority of them are from either italy or spain.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Clegg View PostIn point 11 you criticise a dislike of a religious minority, in point 12 you exhibit a dislike of a religious minority. Nice one.
Cenk Uygur
Why Soccer Sucks
Imagine if Game 7 of the NBA Championship ended in a tie, and they decided the winners by shooting five free throws apiece. Imagine if the Superbowl ended in a tie, and they chose five players from each side to kick field goals to decide the winner. Imagine if the World Series ended in a tie, and they picked five pitchers aside to throw strikes, or five catchers to throw out base runners, or five batters to have a home run hitting contest.
It would be preposterous and infantile. And oh yeah, unjust. But that's how the rest of the world is - a little underdeveloped and full of injustice. And that's how they like their games.
America is based on a just and efficient meritocracy that thrives on measured competition. That's why soccer has never really quite caught on here. They play a whole game and often the only score is a single goal awarded based on a flop in the penalty area. Americans would never stand for it. It reeks of random injustice and unearned glory.
Could you imagine if they played a whole basketball game and no one was able to score and then based on one foul the other team got a free throw worth fifty points? That about sums up soccer.
A culture gets the sport it deserves. While America runs and runs, the rest of the world takes its time and people's lives often change with one critical stroke of luck. In America, we believe in second chances. There's almost always hope that you can catch up in basketball and football. In soccer, you fall behind by two goals and you're pretty much done.
This is the point when a ******* would say that I am giving America too much credit and that I am being unfair to the rest of the world. And that both cultures are fine, it's just two different systems that lead to two different games. For all those who don't believe I'm a former conservative, let me help prove it - the American system is better.
(Yes, I know these ******* and conservative labels are absurd, just roll with me here. Pretend you're watching soccer and you're not bothered by all the absurdities in the game.)
It's better to have hope that you can overcome long odds and steep deficits. It's better to have games decided by merit rather than the award of an often-times random arbiter. It is better to be more efficient and be more assured that'll you'll be rewarded for your labors.
How often have you seen a soccer game where one team completely outplays the other and the weaker side wins anyway based on a fluke goal? The answer is -- all the time. I understand there's luck and fluke plays in all sports, but they are not as critical when they are not the only score in the game.
In soccer, one goal often determines who wins. In the rest of the world, one strike against you often determines your whole life. And that sucks.
Yes, I know soccer is an art form and it has a different beauty. And actually I love the World Cup despite the fact that I think the players are unacceptably whiny actors and that the Artic ice cap is more likely to fall into the ocean than have an important soccer game with more than two goals. But despite my affinity for a game I actually grew up with (I was raised in Turkey and New Jersey, both soccer hubs), I can see its faults clearly. It might be the beautiful game but it is not the just game. To me, justice matters.
Go ahead, tell me how I don't understand and how I am an American brute. Just don't fall down in fake, agonizing pain as you're complaining.
Comment
Comment