Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I feel sorry for Wlad's next opponent

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #31
    Originally posted by Derranged View Post
    Bottomline is I've seen MUCH worse.
    Mills Lane disqualified Henry Akinwande for the same thing against Lennox Lewis.

    Comment

      #32
      Originally posted by gavinz1970 View Post
      You still don't know the difference between clinching and holding, do you? Clinching is legal, holding is not.
      You're biased and blind, so your opinion does not count. Now move on!

      Comment

        #33
        Originally posted by GunStar View Post
        Mills Lane disqualified Henry Akinwande for the same thing against Lennox Lewis.
        Talk about posting the same thing repeatedly. I don't remember Lennox continuously clubbing him in the back of the head, either.

        Comment

          #34
          Originally posted by gavinz1970 View Post
          Talk about posting the same thing repeatedly. I don't remember Lennox continuously clubbing him in the back of the head, either.
          Maybe like 2 or 3 times, not 100 times like you. Now move on little boy.

          Comment

            #35
            Originally posted by SoCaL_951 View Post
            Once Peter gets past Maskaev, the rematch should take place this year to unify there titles and put all speculation to an end.
            I doubt this very much. considering peter or his people never pushed for a rematch. I think they'll avoid wlad

            Comment

              #36
              Originally posted by GunStar View Post
              Mills Lane disqualified Henry Akinwande for the same thing against Lennox Lewis.
              lol,,,comparing that to wlad just proves youre either biased or know nothing about boxing. wlad doesnt do any more clinching than ali did. if you dont like it blame manny steward. all the inside clinching started when manny took over as his trainor

              Comment

                #37
                Wlad's next opponent will end up in a stretcher.

                Comment

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Lucky13 View Post
                  Wlad's next opponent will end up in a stretcher.
                  wlad's next opponent will be jabbed all the way to a loss.

                  Comment

                    #39
                    Originally posted by WLAD OWNS View Post
                    Even though Wlad dominated Sultan Ibragimov and won the fight 119-109 on my scorecard he was still upset and disappointed with his performance...Wlad wants another unification fight or IBF/WBO mandatory defense AS SOON AS POSSIBLE to make up for the dominant yet lackluster fight last weekend.

                    Let me tell you right now folks, Wlad's next opponent is gonna get brutally KO'd or TKO'd.....I am willing to bet all my points on a Wlad victory by KO/TKO in his next fight.
                    He doesn't feel upset with his performance because he could have changed it at any time. He fought the way he did by his own choice. He was in shape and Many was telling him he had to do more. Wlad is disappointed that he can't perform the way people would like him to because he knows his chin will fail him if he takes too many risks. Wlad owns alright, he owns himself.

                    Comment

                      #40
                      Originally posted by RossCA View Post
                      He doesn't feel upset with his performance because he could have changed it at any time. He fought the way he did by his own choice. He was in shape and Many was telling him he had to do more. Wlad is disappointed that he can't perform the way people would like him to because he knows his chin will fail him if he takes too many risks. Wlad owns alright, he owns himself.
                      the fact is,,,no matter how awful the fight was he still easily beat another undefeated heavyweight and kept his title and gained another. you guys just need to deal with it and move on

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP