Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Ferocity" Did you really give 5 rounds to Hatton???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
    Hatton wins 6 rounds not 5. He's running the fight for the most part just doing more than Mayweather in every nearly every round until round 8.
    You must be a comedian, are you sure you was watching the same fight on the 8th Dec?

    Comment


      #42
      He may of been doing "more" but the "more" he was doing wasn't effective and wasn't landing... so the "more" he was doing was a waste of energy

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by S1MANC View Post
        He may of been doing "more" but the "more" he was doing wasn't effective and wasn't landing... so the "more" he was doing was a waste of energy
        I seen enough landing. Hatton took the first, second and third. Mayweather the 4th. He was the general even with Cortez against him.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
          I seen enough landing. Hatton took the first, second and third. Mayweather the 4th. He was the general even with Cortez against him.
          I've just realised you don't have a clue...

          Comment


            #45
            lmfao

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
              I seen enough landing. Hatton took the first, second and third. Mayweather the 4th. He was the general even with Cortez against him.


              Comment


                #47
                2 3 and 5 were ahtton's i believe. ofcourse i am bias and havent watched the fight again.

                Comment


                  #48
                  I'd give Hatton round two for being the more aggressive and busier fighter.... and he deserves round 5 flat out...

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by S1MANC View Post
                    He may of been doing "more" but the "more" he was doing wasn't effective and wasn't landing... so the "more" he was doing was a waste of energy
                    Anyone who points to compuhoax as a viable source is a moron.

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by Azteca View Post
                      Anyone who points to compuhoax as a viable source is a moron.
                      Considering you got over 3,000 post's your points don't look to healthy... i take it you backed hatton too....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP