BAHAHAHAHAHA. ADP JUST DUCKED HIS OWN CHALLENGE BECAUSE HE'S AFRAID TO ALLOW UNBIASED JUDGES TO REVIEW HIS BULLSHlT. I TOLD YOU THIS DUDE WAS JUST MAKING UP SHlT TO TRY TO RECOVER FROM HIS 4-0 ASSWHOOPIN. LOOK HOW HE TUCKED TAIL AFTER I ACCEPTED THE CHALLENGE AND SIMPLY STATED UNBIASED JUDGES WILL REVIEW OUR STATEMENTS TO DEVELOP THE SCOPE, JUST AS WAS DONE IN THE LAST DEBATE. I EVEN ADDED PROOF THAT HE NOT ONLY AGREED TO THAT IN THE LAST DEBATE, BUT KEPT RELYING ON IT DURING THE DEBATE. FACT!
Originally posted by travestyny
CHALLENGE ACCEPTED
So do you accept the judges objectively developing the scope from our initial statements (as was done in the previous debate) and the quotations that you keep posting?
PROOF THAT YOU ACCEPTED THAT AND EVEN RELIED ON IT IN OUR PREVIOUS DEBATE...BUT IN THIS ONE YOU DON'T WANT UNBIASED JUDGES TO USE OBJECTIVITY IN REVIEWING YOUR BULLSHlT. YOU KNOW THAT THEY WILL SEE THROUGH YOUR SHlT EASILY YOU TRANSPARENT PIECE OF SHlT
Originally posted by ADP02
Billeau2 and Zaroku understood that after we made our statements that we were at that point in time establishing what was the scope and anything that we are disagreeing with.
Originally posted by ADP02
We both said stuff BEFORE the initial statement. Was there an agreement at that point? NOT REALLY.
Originally posted by travestyny
Are you running away? I just accepted in accordance with the rules of our former debate.
ARE YOU AFRAID OF OBJECTIVE JUDGES DECIDING ON THE ISSUES BETWEEN US? LET ME KNOW.
Originally posted by travestyny
DO YOU WANT TO ALLOW OBJECTIVE JUDGES TO SETTLE THE SCOPE (THE EXACT SAME WAY THAT WAS DONE IN THE PAST DEBATE, AND THAT YOU AGREED TO THEN) OR NOT?
Let it be known. Yes or no? LAST TIME I'M GOING TO ASK.
Originally posted by ADP02
Sorry
.
ADP02 IS SCAREDDDDDD. DUCKED HIS OWN CHALLENGE. LMAOOOOOO. YOU LITTLE PVSSY. I KNEW YOU DIDN'T HAVE ANY BALLS IF IT WAS UP TO JUDGES TO REVIEW THIS TOPIC. LOOK HOW EASILY YOU FOLDED.
NOW WHOSE THE DUCK, BlTCH??? TELL US WHAT PROBLEM YOU HAVE WITH UNBIASED JUDGES!QUACK QUACK QUACKKKKK!!!!!
4-0 VICTORY UPHELD DUE TO ADP BEING TOO PVSSY TO ANSWER THE CALL!!!!!!
ADP DUCKED HIS OWN CHALLENGE BECAUSE HE IS AFRAID OF UNBIASED JUDGES. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Originally posted by travestyny
CHALLENGE ACCEPTED
So do you accept the judges objectively developing the scope from our initial statements (as was done in the previous debate) and the quotations that you keep posting?
Originally posted by ADP02
Sorry
.
SO WHAT PART MADE YOU DECLINE, ADP????? WAS IT THE PART THAT SIMPLY ASKED FOR UNBIASED JUDGES TO DEVELOP THE SCOPE. WOWWWWWW. THAT'S A DEAL BREAKER......FOR SOMEONE WHO IS A BlTCH. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.
Travestyny, the DUCK, IS STILL TRYING TO DEFLECT to something other than the challenge on hand.... nothing new
ADP02 vs Travestyny
We have a CHALLENGE in the DOME but I am waiting for the one called DEFLECTOR and DUCKer to ACCEPT the challenge.
- 2 months of arguments.
- Challenge with 1 guy DUCKing for 90 pages thread.
- Challenge in the Dome with the same guy doing anything and everything but accept the challenge.
CHALLENGE WAS ACCEPTED. NOW YOU'RE RUNNING SCARED AND LYING
Why you always lying, bltch?
Originally posted by travestyny
CHALLENGE ACCEPTED
So do you accept the judges objectively developing the scope from our initial statements (as was done in the previous debate) and the quotations that you keep posting?
ADP02 IS BACKING DOWNNNNNNN!
HOW THE FVVCK DO YOU BACK DOWN FROM YOUR OWN CHALLENGE JUST BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT OBJECTIVE JUDGES TO REVIEW YOUR BULLSHlT? THAT'S PATHETIC!
Here'e some proof from a well respected member of our forum.
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
It looks like travestyny accepted your challenge. As long as there are unbiased judges.
The ball is in your court.
WHERE YOU AT, BlTCH. STEP UP AND GET DESTROYED,
I'M GIVING YOU UNTIL THE END OF THE DAY TO ANSWER THIS SIMPLE QUESTION:
What problem do you have with unbiased judges hearing evidence regarding the topic and disagreement.
The same as YOU relied upon during out last debate, when you got destroyed 4-0.
Originally posted by ADP02
Billeau2 and Zaroku understood that after we made our statements that we were at that point in time establishing what was the scope and anything that we are disagreeing with.
Originally posted by ADP02
We both said stuff BEFORE the initial statement. Was there an agreement at that point? NOT REALLY.
By the end of the day you better answer or agree to the challenge. If not, not only will I be clowning you all over this website for losing 4-0 and crying about it for 1.5 years, but I'll also be clowning you for getting your hoe card pulled and backing down, ducking your own challenge because you are afraid unbiased judges will see through your bullshlt. WAITING......YOU HAVE TIL THE END OF THE DAY!
Comment