Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

[travestyny]

1 word?




I have asked you since PAGE #1 to ACCEPT. We have hit the 70 page mark and still waiting for you to ACCEPT DUCKER!!!!






DID YOU ACCEPT?


NO!!!!!






Dude, I mean DUCKER,

You have a CHALLENGE or 2 to ACCEPT!!!!


Be a man, STOP the DUCKING!!!!



So far, you said NO!!!! Just like I expected!!!!

CHECKMATE!!!






This CHALLENGE is relevant to the first debate. So the outcome is important before … doing that one.


You kept on flashing that court case and duped the judges to believe something that was NOT TRUE!!!


Here is you trying that:



STOP SQUIRMING TO OTHER DEBATEs UNTIL YOU ACCEPT THIS ONE!!!!





1 WORD. DO YOU ACCEPT? YES/NO!




.

.

That is not an answer.

AND YOU NEED TO MAKE UP YOUR MIND. IS IT NOW A NEW DEBATE OR IS IT RELATED TO THE OLD DEBATE SO THAT IT WILL SHOW THAT I LIED AND CHEATED? YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS. YOU ARE ALL OVER THE DAMN PLACE.


You said that your topic here is related because the scope of that debate is "can...."

You refuse to pay your former debt because you say it is related to the debate.


Let's settle it to see if that is accurate.



Do you accept that a judge will settle what the scope was so that we can proceed. Yes or No. That's it.


What is your answer?

So now I wanted to clear all of that up now. Before we start.

You stated that, right? Let's get to the bottom of it. Do you agree or not? One word. Yes or no?

[ADP02]

That is not an answer.

AND YOU NEED TO MAKE UP YOUR MIND. IS IT NOW A NEW DEBATE OR IS IT RELATED TO THE OLD DEBATE SO THAT IT WILL SHOW THAT I LIED AND CHEATED? YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS. YOU ARE ALL OVER THE DAMN PLACE.


You said that your topic here is related because the scope of that debate is "can...."

You refuse to pay your former debt because you say it is related to the debate.


Let's settle it to see if that is accurate.



Do you accept that a judge will settle what the scope was so that we can proceed. Yes or No. That's it.


What is your answer?





You stated that, right? Let's get to the bottom of it. Do you agree or not? One word. Yes or no?

Incredible, we hit 70 PAGES Officially and you are still SQUIRMING to AVOID the CHALLENGE!!!




THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE


Be a man, STOP the DUCKING!!!!






So far, you said NO!!!! Just like I expected!!!!


CHECKMATE!!!

[travestyny]

Incredible, we hit 70 PAGES Officially and you are still SQUIRMING to AVOID the CHALLENGE!!!




THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE


Be a man, STOP the DUCKING!!!!






So far, you said NO!!!! Just like I expected!!!!


CHECKMATE!!!

You are blatantly ducking everything I say and just giving ****** memes.


Why don't you want to have a judge decide what the scope is.


Let's try it this way.


I WILL ACCEPT if it can be proven that this is truly related to our debate such that the decision of the debate should be reversed!

1. First step is to settle this beef over what is the accurate scope of our past debate. We settle that by asking the judge to decide based on the evidence.


2. Whatever your information is, you present it. If the judge decides that it overrules my information, then you win. If not you lose.

BASICALLY, THE DEBATE WILL DECIDE IF YOUR NEW INFORMATION OVERRULES THE INFORMATION THAT I PROVIDED AND THUS ESTABLISHES YOU AS THE RIGHTFUL WINNER.

Another fair proposal. Do you accept?

[Spoon23]

ADP02, did you get the memo?

Travesty admitted to being a cheater.

What happens to cheaters?

They get Disqualified.

Your new info proves that I cheated apparently. Ok. No problem.

[IMG]//media.*****.com/media/3o6fITV51yZ1ja8Nz2/source.gif[/IMG]




DQ

[travestyny]

ADP02, did you get the memo?

Travesty admitted to being a cheater.

What happens to cheaters?

They get Disqualified.




[IMG]//media.*****.com/media/3o6fITV51yZ1ja8Nz2/source.gif[/IMG]




DQ

Did I? That's news to me.

But being that you have low comprehension skills, I forgive your latest bout of desperation.


Why won't you answer up about Lomachenko tho? I noticed a few people asking you about him. Maybe they have something to show you....?

[Spoon23]

Your new info proves that I cheated apparently. Ok. No problem.

DQ






[IMG]//media.*****.com/media/l3q2J7KgtglQ5GQH6/*****.gif[/IMG]

[travestyny]

DQ






[IMG]//media.*****.com/media/l3q2J7KgtglQ5GQH6/*****.gif[/IMG]

Your trolling is not even well done


But keep trying. Your boy is taking a long time to reply back. I wonder why he can't even just say, I accept. He has done a lot of running in here. I bet he runs from the latest proposal as well.

[travestyny]

THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE


Be a man, STOP the DUCKING!!!!

Where did you go? Come on. We have the perfect way to settle this now. You should be happy, and I will be happy because I will know that this is not a complete DEFLECTION that will just be a waste of time.


I will accept the Willy Wanker Challenge. All you have to do is add to the scope that your new information will prove that you should have been the rightful winner of our debate. Then....prove it.

First we have to settle what the scope was of the initial debate.

Then, you present your information and we see if it proves you are right.


So I'm giving you want you want. I'm agreeing as long as you show this is not a useless deflection.

If you fail to prove to the judge that it means you should have been the rightful winner of our debate, with respect to the original scope, then you lose.

ALSO, YOU GIVE YOUR POINTS OWED TO THE JUDGE SO THAT IF YOU LOSE, YOU CAN'T WELCH AGAIN. JUST LIKE YOU WANTED.

THE CHALLENGE IS FOR PERMANENT BAN AND ALL POINTS

So Yes, I accept under the condition that you must show proof that your information proves you should have been the true winner of the past debate, since you yourself claim that it would do just that.

What is the answer? Do you accept the 'WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE.' Yes or no?


NO MORE ROOM FOR DUCKING NOW, IS THERE. THIS DEFINITIVELY SETTLES EVERYTHING. IT SETTLES THE LAST DEBATE, IT SETTLES YOUR NEW INFORMATION. IT SETTLES WHAT THE SCOPE WAS. EVERYTHING WRAPPED UP NEATLY TOGETHER. PERFECT!


SO...DO YOU AGREE OR DECLINE? I DON'T WANT TO SEE AN ESSAY. I WANT A YES OR NO ANSWER. IF YOU DECLINE THIS, THAT MEANS YOU KNOW WHAT INFORMATION YOU HAVE DOES NOT AFFECT THE RESULT OF OUR DEBATE, LIKE YOU CLAIM, AND YOU'RE DONE. LET ME KNOW. I'LL BE WAITING.....


THIS SHOULD END EVERYTHING. NO DUCKING. NO DEFLECTING. ALL THE MARBLES. ARE YOU IN OR NOT?

[ShoulderRoll]

Let me ask you one more thing, homie.


Any difference between these two statements?






I don't see the difference and I'm wondering why ADP has been trying so hard for over a year to walk back this statement. This dude is the most dishonest scumbag bar none and he knows it, which is why he wont' accept a rematch. He knows any judge will see right through who is the real liar here.

I honestly don't see much difference between those two statements.

Other than the fact that you specified WADA labs while ADP02 leaves it more general.

[travestyny]

I honestly don't see much difference between those two statements.

Other than the fact that you specified WADA labs while ADP02 leaves it more general.

And that is exactly why ADP shlts his pants when I mention rematch.

He knows any unbiased judge will see through all of his lies. Everything he mentioned about his point or the scope reveals he lost and he has spent 70 pages here trying to take them all back and refusing to have a judge review the info.

Ain’t that right, ADP02?