Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Originally posted by travestyny
View Post
There were 2 OPTIONs that I gave you.
It appears that you ACCEPTED with OPTION 2:
- You win the challenge, I do what you said.
- I win the challenge, you apologize to the judges for duping them with that CAS court case.
I do not even want any points if I win. You can get as many points as you want. We can give a third party the points that you want. You win, you get them all.
This CHALLENGE is relevant to the first debate. So the outcome is important before deciding who gets to do what.
You kept on flashing that court case and duped the judges to believe something that was NOT TRUE!!!
Here is you trying that:
Court of Arbitration for Sport: "rEPO is not a threshold substance: as a result, the mere identification of the substance is sufficient to report an adverse analytical finding."
Comment