Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

[ADP02]

Miss placed? Dude wake the fuvk up! Your talking to a transgender. She's got no balls left lol That's why her hormones are upside down. That's how a fickle a wannabbee female can get when to much artificial oestrogen went to her system. She tends to lose what little manhood she has left. That is why, you are where you are bruh. Just continue exposing this biatch as hoe. You are killing it hehe!

2 more challenges that she flaked. Damn! You got her good.

Cheers!

You have a good point. Travestny has no BALLs!

2 CHALLENGES, 33 pages in this thread and still waiting for Travestyny to ACCEPT the challenges!!!

from

[travestyny]

You have a good point. Travestny has no BALLs!

2 CHALLENGES, 33 pages in this thread and still waiting for Travestyny to ACCEPT the challenges!!!

Let's do a little recap shall we?

1. You went so far as to claim that this was never about Mayweather just so you can try to desperately duck your 4-0 loss you cheating scumbag!!!!!!!

Ahemmmmm.

You said thresholds are not a factor for Floyd but that is not an accurate statement.
EPO, testosterone (T/E) ratios are a few naturally produced substances in humans in which Floyd could have been trying to hide. We know of low T/E ratios, rumors of positive results and the IV scandal.

So if GC/MS or whatever measures EPO values below a threshold, as an example, due to a 6 hour delay and drinking fluids plus an IV that diluted the urine sample just enough.
Its NOT being biased. that is a big deal.


.

YOUR STATEMENT LOOKS STRAIGHT UP IDIOTIC RIGHT NOW, AS I'VE PROVEN EXACTLY WHAT I TOLD YOU. YOU ARE FULL OF SHlT AND HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE FVVCK YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!!!!! I BET YOU DON'T BELIEVE THAT DUMB SHlT YOU SAID ANYMORE. YOUR CONSPIRACY THEORY JUST WENT DOWN THE DRAIN!!!!

BUSTED!!!!!

2. You are now desperately trying to change the scope of the 1.5 year old debate because you know you have NOTHING.. Trying to lay your hat on an old criteria that was, like I said, both not a threshold AND not in scope. YOU EVEN ADMITTED IT WAS OUT OF SCOPE BUT NOW YOU HAVE AMNESIA BECAUSE YOU CAN'T SLEEP AT NIGHT BECAUSE OF THAT 4-0 ASSWHIPPIN 1.5 YEARS AGO!!!!.

2) WHILE OUT OF SCOPE, this specific criteria had an "and/OR" in which the panel was describing. In that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using EPO, it can be used.

BUSTEDDDD!!!!

3. You've declined every challenge I offered you here, from challenges specifically about that court case, challenges specifically about the BAP, AND A REMATCH.

You could have just said: Is the BAP test inherently a threshold test

ADP DECLINED!

TOPIC: THE CASE BERGMAN VS. USADA CONSISTED OF NO THRESHOLD CRITERIA.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IN THAT COURT CASE WAS A 80% THRESHOLD TEST.

ADP DECLINED

Topic: In the case USADA vs. Bergman, the BAP test served as a threshold type test.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IS INHERENTLY A THRESHOLD TEST, and had a threshold of 80% in the Bergman case!

ADP DECLINED

What's up, pvssy? You going to answer? I mean, you keep claiming that you won and that I duped someone. But when I offered you a rematch, you renounced your statements!!!!!

That's called putting up the white flag, bltch You're done. Unless you want that rematch. Let me know, yea?

ADP DECLINED

Just agree to the challenge.

So you're going to argue that in that case, the BAP is a threshold test, right? That's all I want to know.

Yes or no?

ADP ACCEPTED......AND THEN DECLINED ONE POST LATER!

Rematch????

By the way, rematch whenever you like. You won't even respond to my offers for a rematch, because you know you don't stand a chance. Give up.

Would you accept a rematch against Travestyny in the Thunderdome?

But would you accept a rematch with Travestyny in the Thunderdome, with posters that you both agree on as the judges?

Would you be willing to rematch Travestyny in the Thunderdome with regular posters as judges, though?

there is no point asking.

BUSTEDDDD!!!!

ADP IS GOING TO CRY FOR YEARS ABOUT THAT 4-0 LOSS. STOP BEGGING FOR ATTENTION, BlTCH. YOU NEVER HAD ANY BALLS AND NOW YOU HAVE NO HEAD BECAUSE I DECAPITATED YOU 4-0!!!! CHOKE ON IT AND DIE, BlTCH. BUT GIVE ME MY POINTS!!!

4-0!!!!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

ENJOY YOUR PADDED ROOM!

[ADP02]

Let's do a little recap shall we?

1. You went so far as to claim that this was never about Mayweather just so you can try to desperately duck your 4-0 loss you cheating scumbag!!!!!!!

Ahemmmmm.



YOUR STATEMENT LOOKS STRAIGHT UP IDIOTIC RIGHT NOW, AS I'VE PROVEN EXACTLY WHAT I TOLD YOU. YOU ARE FULL OF SHlT AND HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE FVVCK YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!!!!! I BET YOU DON'T BELIEVE THAT DUMB SHlT YOU SAID ANYMORE. YOUR CONSPIRACY THEORY JUST WENT DOWN THE DRAIN!!!!

BUSTED!!!!!

2. You are now desperately trying to change the scope of the 1.5 year old debate because you know you have NOTHING.. Trying to lay your hat on an old criteria that was, like I said, both not a threshold AND not in scope. YOU EVEN ADMITTED IT WAS OUT OF SCOPE BUT NOW YOU HAVE AMNESIA BECAUSE YOU CAN'T SLEEP AT NIGHT BECAUSE OF THAT 4-0 ASSWHIPPIN 1.5 YEARS AGO!!!!.

BUSTEDDDD!!!!

3. You've declined every challenge I offered you here, from challenges specifically about that court case, challenges specifically about the BAP, AND A REMATCH.


ADP DECLINED!


ADP DECLINED


ADP DECLINED


ADP DECLINED


ADP DECLINED


ADP DECLINED


ADP ACCEPTED......AND THEN DECLINED ONE POST LATER!

Rematch????

BUSTEDDDD!!!!

ADP IS GOING TO CRY FOR YEARS ABOUT THAT 4-0 LOSS. STOP BEGGING FOR ATTENTION, BlTCH. YOU NEVER HAD ANY BALLS AND NOW YOU HAVE NO HEAD BECAUSE I DECAPITATED YOU 4-0!!!! CHOKE ON IT AND DIE, BlTCH. BUT GIVE ME MY POINTS!!!

4-0!!!!!!

[/CENTER]

ENJOY YOUR PADDED ROOM!

Yawn,
Mr DUCK, are you still looking for ways to DEFLECT from what we originally agreed to?

There was just 1 limitation and you fouled constantly with that one. This was not a topic about threshold substances as per our agreement
but
even your initial statements was about threshold susbtances and you kept doing that throughout the debate. So that should have been a DQ right there since you couldn't even limit it on the 1 item that we did agree to!!!!


Secondly, MR DUCK, you even said it yourself just before we agreed (same thread) that it was NOT about Floyd nor Manny!!! Oooops!!!

Travestyny
This is not even a Floyd vs. Manny issue. This is a very simple look at some information about WADA and analyze it issue.

BUSTED!!!!!

Finally, you said a few things such as, WADA never had threshold type tests for EPO. In fact, you went 2 steps further and said this. Meaning, even the old BAP was not a threshold type test nor can there be for any non-threshold substances!!!!

Travestyny
NO I DIDN'T MORON. YOU ARE THE ONE WHO KEEPS TALKING ABOUT THRESHOLDS WHEN THE CAS SAID THERE ARE NO THRESHOLDS. LMAOOOOOOOOOO. YOU CLAIM TO BE SMART BUT YOU STILL CAN'T UNDERSTAND THIS SIMPLE CONCEPT!!!!! I TOLD YOU AT THE BEGINNING...

GOOD LUCK PROVING THAT A NON-THRESHOLD SUBSTANCE RELIES ON THRESHOLD TESTS...YOU MORON!!!

and even in that post that YOU provided, you can see that I mentioned T/E RATIO!!!! Oooops!


That is also one marker that is related to ABP. Ooops! I'm sure that I mentioned T/E Ratio more than 1 time!


Like I said, we limited the first debate to 1 thing and you couldn't even do that right!!!




but there are 2 challenges now.

This 2nd challenge is CLEAR now, right? SO what is the DELAY?????


So as you can see, it is about AVOIDING more than debating for you!!!





ARE YOU UP TO THE 2 CHALLENGES?


YES BOTH!!!!!


LETs GET IT ON!!!!!!






This is embarrassing Travestyny, we are on 34+ pages. It is time to be a man, son!!!!


STOP THE DEFLECTIONs, THE LIES, THE CHEATING and NOW THE FREAKING CRYING!!!!

from

[travestyny]

Yawn,
Mr DUCK, are you still looking for ways to DEFLECT from what we originally agreed to?

There was just 1 limitation and you fouled constantly with that one. This was not a topic about threshold substances as per our agreement
but
even your initial statements was about threshold susbtances and you kept doing that throughout the debate. So that should have been a DQ right there since you couldn't even limit it on the 1 item that we did agree to!!!!

THIS WAS NOT A FLOYD/MANNY ISSUE MORON. THIS WAS A FLOYD TESTING ISSUE. AND THE FACT THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO HIDE THAT IS FUVVCKING HYSTERICAL.

NO PERSON WHO IS BEING HONEST WOULD SAY THAT THIS WHOLE THING WASN'T ABOUT THE MAYWEATHER IV. THAT'S HOW YOU MAKE IT CLEAR THAT YOU ARE SO DESTROYED BY YOUR LOSS THAT YOU ARE BLATANTLY TRYING TO CHEAT. AHAHAHAHAHAHA. I LOVE THAT I DID THIS TO YOU. EVERYONE CAN SEE WHAT A LYING PIECE OF SHlT YOU ARE!!!!!!

So what you're saying is that you admit your Floyd EPO theory was bullshlt. Thank you for that. Second. Take this!

BEFORE THE DEBATE BEGAN

When he comes with his information, I'll easily prove that his info is outdated and not applicable.

MY FIRST REPLY TO YOUR INFORMATION.

2. ADP02's information is largely outdated. The purpose of this debate is not to go back to a time before WADA was doing testing or when WADA was experimenting on how to test for EPO. It's also not to talk about what may happen in the future. This is to discuss testing in present times. By present times, we mean around the time of May 2nd, 2015

BOOM!!!!! BUT IF THAT AINT ENOUGH.


CAN YOU EXPLAIN THIS? YOU STILL HAVE NO ANSWER. BHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

2) WHILE OUT OF SCOPE, this specific criteria had an "and/OR" in which the panel was describing. In that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using EPO, it can be used.

HOW IS THE 2009 DOCUMENT OUT OF SCOPE ACCORDING TO YOU IF IT WAS.....IN SCOPE???????

BUSTEDDDDDD!!!

YOU CAN'T WIN YOU DUMB BlTCH!

Secondly, MR DUCK, you even said it yourself just before we agreed (same thread) that it was NOT about Floyd nor Manny!!! Oooops!!!

BUSTED!!!!!

ONE MORE TIME!!!!!

2. ADP02's information is largely outdated. The purpose of this debate is not to go back to a time before WADA was doing testing or when WADA was experimenting on how to test for EPO. It's also not to talk about what may happen in the future. This is to discuss testing in present times. By present times, we mean around the time of May 2nd, 2015

LOOK AT YOU TRYING TO SQUIRRRRRRRMMMMM. THAT'S THE FUNNIEST THING ABOUT THIS WHO SHlT. WHAT WAS THIS ABOUT, ADP? HOW DID WE START TALKING ABOUT EPO? YOU COMPLETELY LIED TO VAGISIL SAYING WE WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT EPO. WHO WERE WE TALKING ABOUT YOU LYING BlTCH???

You said thresholds are not a factor for Floyd but that is not an accurate statement.
EPO, testosterone (T/E) ratios are a few naturally produced substances in humans in which Floyd could have been trying to hide. We know of low T/E ratios, rumors of positive results and the IV scandal.

So if GC/MS or whatever measures EPO values below a threshold, as an example, due to a 6 hour delay and drinking fluids plus an IV that diluted the urine sample just enough.
Its NOT being biased. that is a big deal.


.

EXPLAINNNNNNN.... LMAOOOOOO!!!! BUSTEDDDD!!!!!

Finally, you said a few things such as, WADA never had threshold type tests for EPO. In fact, you went 2 steps further and said this. Meaning, even the old BAP was not a threshold type test nor can there be for any non-threshold substances!!!!




and even in that post that YOU provided, you can see that I mentioned T/E RATIO!!!! Oooops!


That is also one marker that is related to ABP. Ooops! I'm sure that I mentioned T/E Ratio more than 1 time!


Like I said, we limited the first debate to 1 thing and you couldn't even do that right!!!




but there are 2 challenges now.

This 2nd challenge is CLEAR now, right? SO what is the DELAY?????


So as you can see, it is about AVOIDING more than debating for you!!!





ARE YOU UP TO THE 2 CHALLENGES?


YES BOTH!!!!!


LETs GET IT ON!!!!!!






This is embarrassing Travestyny, we are on 34+ pages. It is time to be a man, son!!!!


STOP THE DEFLECTIONs, THE LIES, THE CHEATING and NOW THE FREAKING CRYING!!!!

LOOK AT ALL OF THOSE DEFLECTIONS. DUDE, YOU GOT YOUR ASS BEAT AND THAT'S THAT. YOU WANT TO CHANGE THE SCOPE NOW BECAUSE YOU GOT YOUR ASS BEAT? LMAOOOOOOO. SUCK MY BIG FAT C@CK!



1. TELL US WHAT YOU THOUGHT THE SCOPE WAS. THEN EXPLAIN WHY YOU SAID THE 2009 DOCUMENT WAS OUT OF SCOPE. LET'S SEE YOUR ANSWER. I'LL BE WAITING.


2. SAY THAT THIS WASN'T ABOUT MAYWEATHER TESTING, THEN EXPLAIN WHY YOUR POSTS WERE ABOUT...MAYWEATHER TESTING. LET'S SEE OUR ANSWER!!!!!


YOU DUCKED LIKE 7 CHALLENGES HERE AND YOU DUCKED THE REMATCH. THAT'S WHY I OWN YOUR SOUL YOU LITTLE *****. TRYING TO SQIRM OUT OF IT WON'T WORK WHEN I HAVE SO MUCH INFORMATION THAT DESTROYS YOU!

THAT WAS A GOOD TRY. NOT REALLY. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ENJOY YOUR PADDED ROOM, BlTCH!!!!!

4-0!!!!!!

[CENTER]//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

[travestyny]

I BEAT THE LIVING SHlT OUT OF YOU AND YOU CAN'T MOVE ON. LMAOOOOOOOO!!!!! DIDN'T I TELL YOU THAT WHEN THE DEBATE ENDS I WAS GOING TO CLOWN YOU FOR THE REST OF YOUR TIME HERE????? YOU HAD TO TAKE A FVVCKING BREAK FROM POSTING, YOU DECIDED TO COME BACK WITH SOME NEW LIES, BUT YOU CAN'T SHAKE WHAT WAS SET IN STONE, BlTCH. THE DEBATE WAS 1.5 YEARS AGO AND YOU CAN'T MOVE ON.


That's what you call RUINING SOMEONE'S LIFE. KILL YOURSELF!!!!!!!!!

4-0!!!!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

[ADP02]

THIS WAS NOT A FLOYD/MANNY ISSUE MORON. THIS WAS A FLOYD TESTING ISSUE. AND THE FACT THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO HIDE THAT IS FUVVCKING HYSTERICAL.

NO PERSON WHO IS BEING HONEST WOULD SAY THAT THIS WHOLE THING WASN'T ABOUT THE MAYWEATHER IV. THAT'S HOW YOU MAKE IT CLEAR THAT YOU ARE SO DESTROYED BY YOUR LOSS THAT YOU ARE BLATANTLY TRYING TO CHEAT. AHAHAHAHAHAHA. I LOVE THAT I DID THIS TO YOU. EVERYONE CAN SEE WHAT A LYING PIECE OF SHlT YOU ARE!!!!!!

So what you're saying is that you admit your Floyd EPO theory was bullshlt. Thank you for that. Second. Take this!

BEFORE THE DEBATE BEGAN


MY FIRST REPLY TO YOUR INFORMATION.


BOOM!!!!! BUT IF THAT AINT ENOUGH.


CAN YOU EXPLAIN THIS? YOU STILL HAVE NO ANSWER. BHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

BUSTEDDDDDD!!!

YOU CAN'T WIN YOU DUMB BlTCH!




ONE MORE TIME!!!!!




LOOK AT YOU TRYING TO SQUIRRRRRRRMMMMM. THAT'S THE FUNNIEST THING ABOUT THIS WHO SHlT. WHAT WAS THIS ABOUT, ADP? HOW DID WE START TALKING ABOUT EPO? YOU COMPLETELY LIED TO VAGISIL SAYING WE WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT EPO. WHO WERE WE TALKING ABOUT YOU LYING BlTCH???

EXPLAINNNNNNN.... LMAOOOOOO!!!! BUSTEDDDD!!!!!

LOOK AT ALL OF THOSE DEFLECTIONS. DUDE, YOU GOT YOUR ASS BEAT AND THAT'S THAT. YOU WANT TO CHANGE THE SCOPE NOW BECAUSE YOU GOT YOUR ASS BEAT? LMAOOOOOOO. SUCK MY BIG FAT C@CK!



1. TELL US WHAT YOU THOUGHT THE SCOPE WAS. THEN EXPLAIN WHY YOU SAID THE 2009 DOCUMENT WAS OUT OF SCOPE. LET'S SEE YOUR ANSWER. I'LL BE WAITING.


2. SAY THAT THIS WASN'T ABOUT MAYWEATHER TESTING, THEN EXPLAIN WHY YOUR POSTS WERE ABOUT...MAYWEATHER TESTING. LET'S SEE OUR ANSWER!!!!!


YOU DUCKED LIKE 7 CHALLENGES HERE AND YOU DUCKED THE REMATCH. THAT'S WHY I OWN YOUR SOUL YOU LITTLE *****. TRYING TO SQIRM OUT OF IT WON'T WORK WHEN I HAVE SO MUCH INFORMATION THAT DESTROYS YOU!

THAT WAS A GOOD TRY. NOT REALLY. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

ENJOY YOUR PADDED ROOM, BlTCH!!!!!

4-0!!!!!!

[/CENTER]

BUT what did you say, DEFLECTOR?

See, you do not even believe what you posted back then! You said it is NOT about Floyd and Manny! Ooops!



As for those other posts that you provided, they have already been explained.
a) None were part of any agreement that we made at the start of the thread.

b) You just found what I meant. You provided me the quote that made you say, OOOPs, this guy is going to bust my line that "WADA never had threshold tests for EPO". That is, the debate had already started and you saw by then that you were WRONG so you were TRYING to limit the discussion!!!

c) BTW - This is NOT the only time you did that. You even limited what criteria from which document was still valid LIAR and CHEAT!!!!!

d) By you using a case that was basically on a drug abuse from about 2003, you opened this wide open!!! That case was mainly about BAP testing. On top of that, you got those statements WRONG and LIED & CHEATED your way and abused because you knew that the judges wouldn't pick up what you were saying(lying) and so they believed it!

MRPL-Parameter - You used that to confuse judge #2, at least.

Limit (BUT we had no limits) to confirmation tests when you thought there may be threshold type tests for screening/presumptive testing for EPO. - You did that throughout but did that AGAIN soon after Zaroku popped in.

and more …...

[travestyny]

OH, I'M SORRY. I LEFT OUT ONE OF YOUR DEFLECTIONS THAT EVEN THE JUDGES DIDN'T FALL FOR!!!!

HERE YOU GO!

Ok, revised challenge to accommodate the cowardly, cheating ADP02.


Topic: Is EPO measured using "threshold criteria" by WADA labs?

NOW TELL ME, DOES THE ABP MEASURE EPO? Hmmmm. Let's let WADA handle that.

The fundamental principle of the Athlete Biological Passport (ABP) is to monitor selected biological variables over time that indirectly reveal the effects of doping rather than attempting to detect the doping substance or method itself.

YOU CAN'T WIN YOU CHEATING, DEFLECTING, DUMB BlTCH.



LOOK AT THAT QUOTATION WITH THE TOPIC ABOVE. YOU WERE ALWAYS A COWARD AND A CHEAT. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE NOW IS YOU'RE MY BlTCH. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! WOOOOOO!

PAY ME THE POINTS YOU OWE, YOU DI****ABLE F@GGOT! I CAN SMELL YOUR ***** FROM HERE!

4-0!!!!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

[img]//media.*****.com/media/hroV3K17Bodoc/source.gif[/img]

[travestyny]

BUT what did you say, DEFLECTOR?

See, you do not even believe what you posted back then! You said it is NOT about Floyd and Manny! Ooops!

CAN YOU READ? I SAID IT WASN'T ABOUT FLOYD AND MANNY. I CLEARY SAID IT WAS ABOUT HIS TESTING CIRCA MAY 2ND. AND SO DID YOU. ON TWO ACCOUNTS.

1. By starting this whole thing about his IV you lying sack of shlt!!!!!

2. By saying the TD2009EPO document was OUT OF SCOPE. That reveals you knew this was about present day testing. Or is that wrong?


Let's see you twist that. ANSWER UP BlTCH!

As for those other posts that you provided, they have already been explained.
a) None were part of any agreement that we made at the start of the thread.

SO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS THAT YOU THOUGHT IT WAS OUT OF SCOPE BUT NOW YOU WANT TO SAY IT WAS ACTUALLY IN SCOPE. LMAOOOOOOOOOO. YOU ARE THE BIGGEST BlTCH ON THIS SITE BY FAR. LOG OUT!!!!! YOU CAN'T ARGUE FOR PAGES AND PAGES ABOUT STAY ON SCOPE, STAY ON SCOPE, AND SAY WHAT YOU THINK WAS THE SCOPE, WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT I ALSO AGREE WAS THE SCOPE....AND NOW YOU DON'T WANT IT TO BE THE SCOPE.

IT'S OVER. YOU SAID IT AND YOU CAN'T GO BACK BlTCH. GIVE THE FVVCK UP. YOUR LIFE WAS RUINED 1.5 YEARS AGO, YOU WERE MENTALLY SCARRED, AND YOU CAN'T RECOVER!!!!

b) You just found what I meant. You provided me the quote that made you say, OOOPs, this guy is going to bust my line that "WADA never had threshold tests for EPO". That is, the debate had already started and you saw by then that you were WRONG so you were TRYING to limit the discussion!!!

c) BTW - This is NOT the only time you did that. You even limited what criteria from which document was still valid LIAR and CHEAT!!!!!

d) By you using a case that was basically on a drug abuse from about 2003, you opened this wide open!!! That case was mainly about BAP testing. On top of that, you got those statements WRONG and LIED & CHEATED your way and abused because you knew that the judges wouldn't pick up what you were saying(lying) and so they believed it!

MRPL-Parameter - You used that to confuse judge #2, at least.

Limit (BUT we had no limits) to confirmation tests when you thought there may be threshold type tests for screening/presumptive testing for EPO. - You did that throughout but did that AGAIN soon after Zaroku popped in.

and more …...

WHAT THE FUVVVCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT. DID YOU SAY IT OR NOT? UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!! ZAROKU WAS THERE WHEN YOU WERE CRYING OVER AND OVER ABOUT THE SCOPE. YOU DON'T GET TO CHANGE THAT NOW YOU CRYING SACK OF SHlT. YOU ARE LESS THAN A MAN. YOU ARE FVVCKING ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC. LOG OUT AND DON'T COME BACK ANYMORE. I'M DONE WITH YOU, YOU FVVCKING LOWLIFE, LYING, WRETCHED BlTCH THAT IS GOING TO CRY FOR YEARS AND YEARS OVER A 1.5 YEAR OLD DEBATE ON A WEBSITE THAT HE LOST 4-0. WHAT KIND OF HUMAN BEING ARE YOU? GET A FVVCKING LIFE OR KILL YOURSELF!!!!!

4-0!!!!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

YOU'RE DONE, BlTCH. PAY ME MY FUVVCKING POINTS THAT YOU OWE, STOP CRYING, LOG THE FVVCK OUT...OR JUST END YOUR LIFE!

HE DIDN'T MAKE IT. MAN DOWNNNN!!!!!

[ADP02]

OH, I'M SORRY. I LEFT OUT ONE OF YOUR DEFLECTIONS THAT EVEN THE JUDGES DIDN'T FALL FOR!!!!

HERE YOU GO!




NOW TELL ME, DOES THE ABP MEASURE EPO? Hmmmm. Let's let WADA handle that.




YOU CAN'T WIN YOU CHEATING, DEFLECTING, DUMB BlTCH.



LOOK AT THAT QUOTATION WITH THE TOPIC ABOVE. YOU WERE ALWAYS A COWARD AND A CHEAT. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE NOW IS YOU'RE MY BlTCH. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! WOOOOOO!

PAY ME THE POINTS YOU OWE, YOU DI****ABLE F@GGOT! I CAN SMELL YOUR ***** FROM HERE!

4-0!!!!!!

That statement of yours is NOT even acceptable!!!!

There is no measurement of EPO quantity!!! How much EPO did they find? That is for threshold susbtances perhaps and got that statement WRONG!!!!

BUT as I can see, you found no statement of us agreeing to any limitations, right?




It is simple. Instead of looking after the start, or in another thread.

GO FIND what we agreed to.

Do you see agreeing to limit the discussion other than it was not about threshold susbtances, which YOU FAILED at doing, anyways?



WHAT A CHEAT!!!!!!

[travestyny]

That statement of yours is NOT even acceptable!!!!

There is no measurement of EPO quantity!!! How much EPO did they find? That is for threshold susbtances perhaps and got that statement WRONG!!!!

WHAT WAS THAT?????? REPEAT WHAT YOU JUST SAID!!!!!

So if GC/MS or whatever measures EPO values below a threshold, as an example, due to a 6 hour delay and drinking fluids plus an IV that diluted the urine sample just enough.
Its NOT being biased. that is a big deal.
.

REST IN MUTHAFVVCKING PEACE, BlTCH. BUT GIMME MY POINTS FIRST. MY WORK HERE IS DONE!

I'M OUT!

[IMG]//media.*****.com/media/3o7qDSOvfaCO9b3MlO/*****.gif[/IMG]