Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
    Too much QUACKING from the DUCK named, Travestyny!!!!!
    [/SIZE]

    .


    CORRECTION BlTCH. THIS IS WHAT YOU CALL QUACKING!!!!


    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    You could have just said: Is the BAP test inherently a threshold test
    ADP DECLINED!

    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    TOPIC: THE CASE BERGMAN VS. USADA CONSISTED OF NO THRESHOLD CRITERIA.
    ADP DECLINED

    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IN THAT COURT CASE WAS A 80% THRESHOLD TEST.
    ADP DECLINED

    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    Topic: In the case USADA vs. Bergman, the BAP test served as a threshold type test.
    ADP DECLINED

    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IS INHERENTLY A THRESHOLD TEST, and had a threshold of 80% in the Bergman case!
    ADP DECLINED

    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    What's up, pvssy? You going to answer? I mean, you keep claiming that you won and that I duped someone. But when I offered you a rematch, you renounced your statements!!!!!

    That's called putting up the white flag, bltch You're done. Unless you want that rematch. Let me know, yea?
    ADP DECLINED

    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    Just agree to the challenge.

    So you're going to argue that in that case, the BAP is a threshold test, right? That's all I want to know.

    Yes or no?
    ADP ACCEPTED......AND THEN DECLINED ONE POST LATER!

    Rematch????

    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
    By the way, rematch whenever you like. You won't even respond to my offers for a rematch, because you know you don't stand a chance. Give up.

    Would you accept a rematch against Travestyny in the Thunderdome?
    But would you accept a rematch with Travestyny in the Thunderdome, with posters that you both agree on as the judges?
    Would you be willing to rematch Travestyny in the Thunderdome with regular posters as judges, though?

    Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
    there is no point asking.
    THIS PVSSY ACTUALLY CRIED FOR OVER A YEAR....BUT THERE IS NO POINT IN ASKING FOR A REMATCH!!!!!!! YOU ARE PATHETIC!!!!


    IT'S OVER PVSSY. PAY ME THE POINTS YOU OWE AND SHUT THE FVVCK UP!

    Comment


      EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS NO POINT IN YOU ASKING FOR A REMATCH, ADP.


      BECAUSE YOU KNOW YOU LOST!!!!!!!!



      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
      there is no point asking.
      PAY YOUR DEBT YOU SLIMY BlTCH!!!!!!!!!


      4-0!!!!!!



      MY BlTCH ADP BETTER HAVE MY MONEY!!!

      Comment


        Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
        Oh, so you are OK with the DEAL.


        OK, I will be setting up the thread in the DOME. Using the example that I provided a few pages ago and you seemed to like.


        GREAT, you finally manned up and found your BALLs!!!!


        AWESOME!!!!!










        You ACCEPTED and now you are changing you mind, AGAIN!!!!



        WHAT A PU$$Y!!!!!!


        I put no pressure on the DUCKER. You want to DUCK, DUCK.



        Too much QUACKING from the DUCK named, Travestyny!!!!!





        .

        So the CHALLENGE was made and from Travestyny we get:


        27 pages of TOTAL DEFLECTIONs!!!!


        DEFLECTO, what do you call someone that DEFLECTs from the CHALLENGE as per the Thread Starter?


        HINT:
        QUACK, QUACK!!!!!




        .

        Comment


          ADP HAVING A MAJOR MENTAL MELTDOWNNNNN. LMAOOOOOO. LET THAT 4-0 SINK IN SLOW, SON. LET IT GET INTO YOUR BONES!!!!!

          ADP02:



          Me:


          [IMG]//media.*****.com/media/pUeXcg80cO8I8/*****.gif[/IMG]

          Comment


            Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
            DEFLECTO, what do you call someone that DEFLECTs from the CHALLENGE as per the Thread Starter?
            .
            LIKE YOU DID WHEN I CHALLENGED YOU ABOUT EPO BEING A THRESHOLD SUBSTANCE:


            Originally posted by travestyny
            The issue: He's claiming that WADA measures EPO as a threshold substance. I disagree. We will need some unbiased judges to present our information to, and then we can get a final decision that we will both agree to accept.

            AND YOU LIED AND SAID IT WAS NEVER ABOUT THAT:

            Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
            This is not a discussion on Threshold substance
            Originally posted by ADP02
            It was NEVER about that. YOU made it about that. It was about EPO and the tests having to pass certain threshold criteria.

            but got caught in a lie!!!!


            Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
            Sample A is a mixture of those 2 urine samples. There the second is diluting the initial one.

            b) Threshold substances, there can be traces but the delay and dilution will drive down the numbers


            WE CALL THAT PERSON ADP02 HAVING A MENTAL MELTDOWN!!!!! LMAOOOOOOOOO! CRY SOME MORE FOR ME, BlTCH!!!!!


            [IMG]//media.*****.com/media/Mxj2eU2WohHtm/*****.gif[/IMG]
            Last edited by travestyny; 08-01-2018, 12:43 AM.

            Comment


              Why was Travestyny feeling so confident before but NOT now???



              He has yet to explain this. Well I can and did.

              Travestyny got caught as the LIAR and CHEAT that he is!


              Another gem:
              Originally Posted by travestyny
              The man who designed the test:
              Dr. Francoise Lasne: NO THRESHOLD FOR EPO ANALOGUE CERA BECAUSE IT IS QUALITATIVE.

              Oh, and this one is particularly important. Tells us not only about your intensity being qualitative, but also, tells us more about the BAP that you keep talking about

              Is the WADA expert wrong? You love that line.

              OWNED.


              Now for the last time....these criteria are NOT threshold criteria. It says it here clearly!

              You give this to someone with little to no knowledge, you can get it passed them.

              But, I put you back into your place!!!!



              .

              Comment


                Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                Why was Travestyny feeling so confident before but NOT now???


                .


                WHY WAS ADP STILL CRYING OVER OUR DEBATE FOR A YEAR AND A HALF BUT NOT WILLING TO ACCEPT A REMATCH?


                Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                there is no point asking.
                4-0!!!!!!


                Comment


                  ADP AND HIS NEW FRIENDS!




                  4-0!!!!!!


                  //krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

                  [img]//media.*****.com/media/135PojGnjRmhrO/*****.gif[/img]

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                    You give this to someone with little to no knowledge, you can get it passed them.
                    .
                    WHAT YOU MEAN IS THAT YOU HAVE LITTLE TO NO KNOWLEDGE IF YOU CAN'T UNDERSTAND THIS!!!!


                    Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                    The threshold test result indicates that there is synthetic EPO if it exceeds the threshold. If less, the indication is that there is only human EPO.

                    there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance

                    HOLY CONTRADICTION!!!!!!!


                    ADP IN THERAPY!!!!


                    Comment


                      Travestyny can you just update the list of DEFLECTIONs that you have provided? I will need to update my TOP 10 LIST to 20+




                      Why did he NOT ACCEPT a challenge that he believes that he won previously?

                      I was even going to include a judge from that debate.


                      AMAZING!!!



                      QUACK, QUACK, QUACK!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP