Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[Spoon23]

You never heard the term "painted into a corner"? That's you...
First video, 8 min in...what happened there?

Have you ever heard of selective mind or selective reading, like when you dismiss a long read by saying you didn't read. That's you.

I suggest you go back a few pages and answer my question. Since I have given you a golden ticket you only simply need to answer before I proceed answering your lame inquiry. As I said I promise I will answer it in the best of my abilities.

But since you have a selective mind. I highly doubt you'll be able to do a simple task in putting things in perspective.

That golden ticket will expire soon.

[Real King Kong]

Have you ever heard of selective mind or selective reading, like when you dismiss a long read by saying you didn't read. That's you.

I suggest you go back a few pages and answer my question. Since I have given you a golden ticket you only simply need to answer before I proceed answering your lame inquiry. As I said I promise I will answer it in the best of my abilities.

But since you have a selective mind. I highly doubt you'll be able to do a simple task in putting things in perspective.

That golden ticket will expire soon.

Lol ok...it's good that aside from your alts, only 4-5 people visit this thread, so the number of people witnessing how much of a fraud you are is limited. So long you been bumpin your gums about dispute it...time stamp...that's what the thread is about..blah blah blah...

First video...8 min...what?

[Reloaded]

Lol ok...it's good that aside from your alts, only 4-5 people visit this thread, so the number of people witnessing how much of a fraud you are is limited. So long you been bumpin your gums about dispute it...time stamp...that's what the thread is about..blah blah blah...

First video...8 min...what?

He is too ****** to know how beat he is lol , youve been soul stomping the wimp for quite a while now and finally you broke his jaw with a straight right .

All you will get outa him from here on in is him dribbling in his lap .

[Spoon23]

Lol ok...it's good that aside from your alts, only 4-5 people visit this thread, so the number of people witnessing how much of a fraud you are is limited. So long you been bumpin your gums about dispute it...time stamp...that's what the thread is about..blah blah blah...

First video...8 min...what?

Just as I thought its that severe. Anger is showing tsk tsk tsk..

Selective disorder common signs found in fl0mos.

It's getting worse. i have to be more understanding with your kind. Carry on ducky

[Real King Kong]

Just as I thought its that severe. Anger is showing tsk tsk tsk..

Selective disorder common signs found in fl0mos.

It's getting worse. i have to be more understanding with your kind. Carry on ducky

Lol...I've got nothing to be angry about at all. I knew you wouldn't respond and said as much when i brought it up. You already looked tho...that's why you won't respond.
keep on dodging weasel...

First video 8 min mark...what do you make of it?

[Spoon23]

So reloaded Tanagalog still waiting for your answer. Seems like you rather skip a few pages here and there. Must be e selective reading or selective ducking is in full effect again like cmsiderthis hehehe

So reloaded as tangalog was asking are you smart?

[Real King Kong]

So reloaded Tanagalog still waiting for your answer. Seems like you rather skip a few pages here and there. Must be e selective reading or selective ducking is in full effect again like cmsiderthis hehehe

So reloaded as tangalog was asking are you smart?

So refresh my memory...who exactly is ducking and dodging here? I disputed something in one of the videos and time stamped it as you asked...and still no answer lol.

First video(round 2) 8 min mark of the video. The pact@rd claimed pac "clearly" landed a missed punch.

[Spoon23]

Okay to get this over with.. I shall answer your inquiry now considerthis. Your golden ticket.

Round 2 video.

Since the author scored it 17 for Pac and 9 for Floyd at the end of round 2.

We shall see if that one comment from considerthis will change the outcome of round 2.

Going in to 6:10 mark of the video Pac gets another body shot in,

making it 2 Pac - 0 Floyd

Then @ 6:21 Floyd gets a soft tap right jab (noted by author that its weak but still scores it for Floyd since he is for fair scoring.)

Making it 2 Pac - 1 Floyd


@ 6:48 nice counter right hand by Floyd ( noted by the author equivalent to pac's body shot)

Making it 2 Pac - 2 Floyd

@ 7:36 Pac flurries but the shots weren't clear so the author said he won't count any of those pac punches he threw. Author is very fair.

@ 8:00 - considerthis inquiry, author says both did a 'GRAZING' shot at each other. Tit for Tat.

Both were weak, but since he decided to score both it doesn't really matter if he scores it or not.

Making it 3 Pac - 3 Floyd


Conclusion: 17-9 was the final score by the author by the end of that round. If your argument considerthis is that it shouldn't be counted since it is just a gracing shot, then Floyd's gracing punch also shouldn't be counted as well. So if we don't credit those punches. The score will just be one point less for each man. Making it 16-8.

Sigh..

Even if let's say I don't count Pac's shot at that mark, even if we clearly see it landed grazingly and just be biased for floyd and score Floyd's gracing punch only for argument sake.

The worst case scenario based on that would be 16-9 Pac

Pac still wins. Jeezzz that's it really?? Sigh.. What a waste..tsk tsk tsk..

Such a shame.. Wasted opportunity. I gave you a golden ticket and that's all you can come up with. What a shame..

Next..

[Spoon23]

You are then teaching how to have no backbone and no sense of being real to face reality , great job .

You were proven wrong .

the fact that i have put up with you attest to my strong backbone and patience...

but the way you answers questions really put a big dent to your reading comprehension...

i asked you a very simple question and you ducked it....

again,

are you smart?

Yup, you have a strong back bone Tangalog, unlike the weak backbone ones who can't answer simple questions, and only to find out he has now dragged and piled up so much unanswered backlog questions hahaha

Like someone we know who has ducked over a mountain of questions and when ask if he is smart? He can't answer it lol

That's the guy with no back bone and no self belief in oneself.. Must be sad to be him tsk tsk tsk..

An opposite of what you are

[Real King Kong]

Okay to get this over with.. I shall answer your inquiry now considerthis. Your golden ticket.

Round 2 video.

Since the author scored it 17 for Pac and 9 for Floyd at the end of round 2.

We shall see if that one comment from considerthis will change the outcome of round 2.

Going in to 6:10 mark of the video Pac gets another body shot in,

making it 2 Pac - 0 Floyd

Then @ 6:21 Floyd gets a soft tap right jab (noted by author that its weak but still scores it for Floyd since he is for fair scoring.)

Making it 2 Pac - 1 Floyd


@ 6:48 nice counter right hand by Floyd ( noted by the author equivalent to pac's body shot)

Making it 2 Pac - 2 Floyd

@ 7:36 Pac flurries but the shots weren't clear so the author said he won't count any of those pac punches threw. Author is very fair.

@ 8:00 - considerthis inquiry, author says both did a 'GRAZING' shot at each other. Tit for Tat.

Both were weak, but since he decided to score both it doesn't really matter if he scores it or not.

Making it 3 Pac - 3 Floyd


Conclusion: 17-9 was the final score by the author by the end of that round. If your argument considerthis is that it shouldn't be counted since it is just a gracing shot, then Floyd's gracing punch also shouldn't be counted as well. So if we don't credit those punches. The score will just be one point less for each man. Making it 16-8.

Sigh..

Even if let's say I don't count Pac's shot at that mark, even if we clearly see it landed grazingly and just be biased for floyd and score Floyd's gracing punch only for argument sake.

The worst case scenario based on that would be 16-9 Pac

Pac still wins. Jeezzz that's it really?? Sigh.. What a waste..tsk tsk tsk..

Such a shame.. Wasted opportunity. I gave you a golden ticket and that's all you can come up with. What a shame..

Next..

Lol...had a feeling you'd "respond" to my post without actually replying to it so i wouldn't know.

I noticed you were careful in saying the guy in the video scored it...not you. The shot missed...he emphatically stated it "clearly" landed...I knew you wouldn't have an opinion on that. Those videos are riddled with that type of ****...but one instance is enough to put his credibility into question. I could break them down further...but it took you 2 days to respond this time, and you didn't even address it in your own words lol. "Dispute it...time stamp it"...yea so you can post the thoughts of the guy in the video. I already saw those...i don't need you for that. You are the biggest joke on this forum.