Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[ADP02]

Here is Travestyny feeling the pressure and that he knows that he is COOKED!!!!! DONE!!!!

Travestyny

We've already gone through this. It's exhausting.

Let it go!!!!

After 85+ pages of DUCKing by the one named Travestyny, he finally calls it here:

Originated from the Travestyny
Forget it. I'm done.

Travestyny QUIT!!!!!

NO MAS!!!!

[travestyny]

SO IN THE END, ADP CLAIMS THAT WE BOTH SAID NO TO VAGUE CHALLENGES. ONLY DIFFERENCE IS, THE CHALLENGE THAT HE IS SAYING NO TO HERE (AMONGST THE MANY THAT HE SAID NO TO HERE) WAS MEDIATED BY SPOON!!!!!!! I ACCEPTED.

HOW THE FVVCK DID ADP DECLINE A SPOON MEDIATED CHALLENGE??? UNBELIEVABLE!!!!

I said NO to a VAGUE CHALLENGE . You know, just like you didn't want this CURRENT CHALLENGE to be VAGUE!!!

BUT IF WE BOTH SAID NO TO VAGUE CHALLENGES, ACCORDING TO YOU ADP, THEN WHAT'S THAT MEAN, ADP?????

4-0 VICTORY UPHELD DUE TO ADP BEING TOO PVSSY TO ANSWER THE CALL!!!!!!

4-0!!!!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=790013

ADP STILL CRYING:

IT'S OVER.

[ADP02]

SO IN THE END, ADP CLAIMS THAT WE BOTH SAID NO TO VAGUE CHALLENGES. ONLY DIFFERENCE IS, THE CHALLENGE THAT HE IS SAYING NO TO HERE (AMONGST THE MANY THAT HE SAID NO TO HERE) WAS MEDIATED BY SPOON!!!!!!! I ACCEPTED.

HOW THE FVVCK DID ADP DECLINE A SPOON MEDIATED CHALLENGE??? UNBELIEVABLE!!!!

BUT IF WE BOTH SAID NO TO VAGUE CHALLENGES, ACCORDING TO YOU ADP, THEN WHAT'S THAT MEAN, ADP?????

4-0 VICTORY UPHELD DUE TO ADP BEING TOO PVSSY TO ANSWER THE CALL!!!!!!

4-0!!!!!!

I CALLED it 1.5 years ago

AND

After 85+ Pages YOU PROVED it by DUCKING


THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE.



IPSO, FATSO, YOU LOST BY DQ!!!!




CALLED IT!!!


YOU LOST YOUR BALLs!!!!




DISQUALIFIED!!!!!

[travestyny]

1. DUCKING!!!!

DO YOU ACCEPT OR NOT???????? FVVCKING ACCEPT AND LET'S GET IT OVER WITH!

NO!!!

2. LYING!!!!

Before:

During the debate, claimed there was no agreement before the initial statements were made official.

We both said stuff BEFORE the initial statement. Was there an agreement at that point? NOT REALLY.

Now:

Claims the scope of our debate came from before the initial statements were made official.

Its simple. Can or does EPO testing go thru threshold type tests?

CLAIMS THE SCOPE HE SPECIFICALLY STATED DURING THE DEBATE THAT WE AGREED UPON WAS....NOT THE SCOPE THAT WE AGREED UPON.

SCOPE that YOU agreed on: Does the EPO technical document refer to threshold criteria?

Fought me tooth and nail to say that "his point" was not the same as the scope I detailed below.

Unless I'm mistaken, the topic is now whether WADA labs have a threshold criteria that must be met for an adverse analytical finding of EPO.

but the above should not be confused with my point. my point was about epo testing includes specific threshold criteria that must be passed in order to conclude a positive result.

3. Cheating!!!!

Before

2) WHILE OUT OF SCOPE, this specific criteria had an "and/OR" in which the panel was describing. In that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using EPO, it can be used.

Now:

You made it be part of the SCOPE.

4. Hypocrite

CLAIMS I CAN'T DECLINE HIS BULLSHlT CHALLENGE BECAUSE THE TOPIC IS VAGUE, BUT WHEN SPOON MEDIATED A PROPOSAL THAT WASN'T VAGUE AND I ACCEPTED IT, HE SAID NO BECAUSE....

I said NO to a VAGUE CHALLENGE . You know, just like you didn't want this CURRENT CHALLENGE to be VAGUE!!!

5. Bet Welcher!!!!

Judge Billeau

Be a man and pay your debt because you are better than this.

ShoulderRoll

ADP02 still hasn't honored his bet. And it's been 2 years.

DEATH OF A CERTIFIED SCUMBAG. I TOLD YOU I WAS GOING TO RUIN YOUR LIFE!!!!!!!!! AND I RUINED YOUR LIFE!!!!

4-0!!!!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=790013

Cry for me, BlTCH!

IT'S OVER.

[travestyny]

DISQUALIFIED!!!!!

GOOD LUCK DISQUALIFYING ME when THE JUDGES HAVE ALL BEEN TELLING YOU FOR THE PAST 1.5 YEARS TO PAY YOUR DEBT. I BET PAQUIAO WISHES HE COULD HAVE DISQUALIFIED MARQUEZ AFTER HE GOT HIS ASS KNOCKED OUT JUST LIKE YOU DID!!!!!

THAT DEBATE SERIOUSLY RUINED YOUR LIFE!!!! LMAOOOOOOO! THIS SHlT IS BOTH SAD AND HYSTERICAL AT THE SAME TIME!!!!!

[travestyny]

Would you accept a rematch against Travestyny in the Thunderdome?

But would you accept a rematch with Travestyny in the Thunderdome, with posters that you both agree on as the judges?

Would you be willing to rematch Travestyny in the Thunderdome with regular posters as judges, though?

there is no point asking.

Time to pay up, f@g!

MY BlTCH ADP BETTER HAVE MY MONEY!!!

[ADP02]

GOOD LUCK DISQUALIFYING ME when THE JUDGES HAVE ALL BEEN TELLING YOU FOR THE PAST 1.5 YEARS TO PAY YOUR DEBT. I BET PAQUIAO WISHES HE COULD HAVE DISQUALIFIED MARQUEZ AFTER HE GOT HIS ASS KNOCKED OUT JUST LIKE YOU DID!!!!!


THAT DEBATE SERIOUSLY RUINED YOUR LIFE!!!! LMAOOOOOOO! THIS SHlT IS BOTH SAD AND HYSTERICAL AT THE SAME TIME!!!!!

Sorry DUCK BOY!

I PROVED that you really deserved to be DQ'd!!!

from

I CALLED it 1.5 years ago

AND

After 85+ Pages YOU PROVED it by DUCKING


THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE.



IPSO, FATSO, YOU LOST BY DQ!!!!




CALLED IT!!!


YOU LOST YOUR BALLs!!!!




DISQUALIFIED!!!!!

[travestyny]

1. DUCKING!!!!

DO YOU ACCEPT OR NOT???????? FVVCKING ACCEPT AND LET'S GET IT OVER WITH!

NO!!!

2. LYING!!!!

Before:

During the debate, claimed there was no agreement before the initial statements were made official.

We both said stuff BEFORE the initial statement. Was there an agreement at that point? NOT REALLY.

Now:

Claims the scope of our debate came from before the initial statements were made official.

Its simple. Can or does EPO testing go thru threshold type tests?

CLAIMS THE SCOPE HE SPECIFICALLY STATED DURING THE DEBATE THAT WE AGREED UPON WAS....NOT THE SCOPE THAT WE AGREED UPON.

SCOPE that YOU agreed on: Does the EPO technical document refer to threshold criteria?

Fought me tooth and nail to say that "his point" was not the same as the scope I detailed below.

Unless I'm mistaken, the topic is now whether WADA labs have a threshold criteria that must be met for an adverse analytical finding of EPO.

but the above should not be confused with my point. my point was about epo testing includes specific threshold criteria that must be passed in order to conclude a positive result.

3. Cheating!!!!

Before

2) WHILE OUT OF SCOPE, this specific criteria had an "and/OR" in which the panel was describing. In that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using EPO, it can be used.

Now:

You made it be part of the SCOPE.

4. Hypocrite

CLAIMS I CAN'T DECLINE HIS BULLSHlT CHALLENGE BECAUSE THE TOPIC IS VAGUE, BUT WHEN SPOON MEDIATED A PROPOSAL THAT WASN'T VAGUE AND I ACCEPTED IT, HE SAID NO BECAUSE....

I said NO to a VAGUE CHALLENGE . You know, just like you didn't want this CURRENT CHALLENGE to be VAGUE!!!

5. Bet Welcher!!!!

Judge Billeau

Be a man and pay your debt because you are better than this.

ShoulderRoll

ADP02 still hasn't honored his bet. And it's been 2 years.

DEATH OF A CERTIFIED SCUMBAG. I TOLD YOU I WAS GOING TO RUIN YOUR LIFE!!!!!!!!! AND I RUINED YOUR LIFE!!!!

4-0!!!!!!

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=740888

//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=790013

Cry for me, BlTCH!

IT'S OVER.

[travestyny]

HAVING YOUR BEST FRIEND SPOON23 JOIN THE THREAD AND MEDIATING A PROPOSAL FOR A REMATCH BETWEEN ME AND YOU, AND ME ACCEPTING IT WHILE ADP DECLINED IS LIKE BUBOY BEING PUT IN CHARGE OF THE DETAILS FOR A MAY/PAC REMATCH, MAYWEATHER AGREEING TO THE FIRST OFFER, AND PACQUIAO TURNING IT DOWN!!!!!

THINK ABOUT THAT!

[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

R.I.P.

[ADP02]

HAVING SPOON23 JOIN THE THREAD AND MEDIATING A PROPOSAL FOR A REMATCH BETWEEN ME AND ADP, AND ME ACCEPTING IT WHILE ADP DECLINED IS LIKE BUBOY BEING PUT IN CHARGE OF THE DETAILS FOR A MAY/PAC REMATCH, MAYWEATHER AGREEING TO THE FIRST OFFER, AND PACQUIAO TURNING IT DOWN!!!!!

THINK ABOUT THAT!

That was

1) YOU SQUIRMING AWAY from the current CHALLENGE as per thread.


2) That was something that you 2 were discussing and I wasn't even involved in because I knew what you were trying to do, DUCKer


3) I laughed at what you were trying to do by using your own words against you (VAGUE) … and at that, AGAIN, just like the roadblocks, VAGUE topic was fine with you!!!


4) Don't worry, I am certainly giving you part of the credit for verify, analyzing and coming to the definite conclusion that you LIED and CHEATED!!!!



WE DID IT TOGETHER!!!!! What a DUET!!!!



Travestyny


the



CHEATER


LIAR



DUCKER



Look at travestyny go in his natural habitat

from