Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[travestyny]

So you didn't say this, ADP? What's up? Are you backtracking AGAINNNNNNNNN

Stop pretending that there is no connection to the first debate. Of course there is a connection to the first debate.

LET'S FIND OUT WHAT CONNECTION IT HAD TO THE FIRST DEBATE, SHALL WE? OR ARE YOU STILL UPSET THAT YOU BEEN CAUGHT LYING OVER AND OVER ABOUT THAT SCOPE. WHAT DO YOU THINK?

[travestyny]

COME ON, ADP. WHAT'S THE HOLD UP? YOU OFFERED THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE AND I ACCEPTED. ARE YOU NOW SAYING THAT YOU DON'T WANT THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE?

YOU WERE TRYING TO ACT REAL TOUGH ABOUT IT BEFORE, WEREN'T YOU. BUT NOW SUDDENLY IT SEEMS YOU DON'T WANT IT. WHAT'S THE MATTER, BRO? IF YOU DON'T WANT THAT CHALLENGE ANYMORE, JUST LET ME KNOW. I'LL JUST CLOWN YOU FOR BEING A BlTCH AND LAUGH AT YOU OVER AND OVER AGAIN. SO WHAT'S THE DEAL?

[SIZE="4"]

THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE


Be a man, STOP the DUCKING!!!!

Let's make this even more clear for this ducking bltch.

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!

THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE:

You prove that the information in the Bergman vs. USADA case proves that WADA Criteria have in place thresholds for EPO testing with respect to the scope of our past debate.

I prove that the information in the Berman vs. USADA case proves that WADA Criteria does not have in place threshold for EPO testing with respect to the Scope of our past debate.

If there is any disagreement about the scope of our last debate(which you have claimed plays a part in this debate), since you been lying about it over and over, and you got caught lying about it, we ask the judge to settle what was the scope of our past debate...because it damn sure wasn't 'can...' and you know I can prove that!

You already claimed that this 'WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE' is related to our past debate, so now it's time for you to step up and prove it.


1. Permanent Ban
2. All Points
3. As per your former request and so that I know you are not going to welch out, you are to pass all of your points to the judge for safe keeping until the challenge is complete.

'WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE' ACCEPTED. DO YOU WANT ME TO CREATE THE THREAD NOW OR NOT? WAITING FOR YOUR REPLY TO GET THIS OVER WITH.

AND DON'T YOU DARE THINK OF DUCKING OUT!

YOU REALLY GONNA BOW OUT??? WHO'S DUCKING THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE NOW, BIG SHOT? LET ME KNOW! LMAOOO!

[Vadrigar.]

Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.

He pu$$ied out.

The biatch pu$$ied out.

It's over.

Flawless victory.





















[img]//media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

KABOOM!

[ADP02]

WHO?


Don't you get it? You are saying, don't I want proof?



DING DING DING!!!!


YOU PROVED IT ALREADY!!!!!!!


You PROVED it by YOUR ACTIONS!!!!






They are connected. I said it several times. So I am being consistent!



BUT




It is NOT the same TOPIC as the first debate. The SCOPE is different. The EXCLUSIONS are different.


IT is all SET




Just waiting for you, Travestyny:
To ACCEPT the NEW CHALLENGE
To ACCEPT THE NEW SCOPE

I ACCEPTED the EXCLUSIONs that you requested.
- Not about ABP testing for EPO
- Not about other non-threshold susbtances

THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE

,

[travestyny]

WHO?


Don't you get it? You are saying, don't I want proof?



DING DING DING!!!!


YOU PROVED IT ALREADY!!!!!!!


You PROVED it by YOUR ACTIONS!!!!






They are connected. I said it several times. So I am being consistent!



BUT




It is NOT the same TOPIC as the first debate. The SCOPE is different. The EXCLUSIONS are different.


IT is all SET




Just waiting for you, Travestyny:
To ACCEPT the NEW CHALLENGE
To ACCEPT THE NEW SCOPE

I ACCEPTED the EXCLUSIONs that you requested.
- Not about ABP testing for EPO
- Not about other non-threshold susbtances

THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE

,

YOU ALREADY POSTED THIS IN THE OTHER THREAD. Why are you trying to put on a show for other people? Are you embarrassed because you got caught out there.


THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE. HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO SAY I ACCEPT??????


The scope is about you having some kind of new information that proves that I lied and cheated to gain votes in our past debate, right?


Well part of the proof has to be....THE SCOPE OF OUR LAST DEBATE....OR HOW ELSE CAN YOU PROVE THAT I LIED AND CHEATED TO GAIN VOTES. TO GAIN VOTES ON WHAT? ON THE SCOPE OF OUR LAST DEBATE. THAT IS PART OF THE PROOF.


So it's very simple. The judges would have to know what the scope of our last debate was. WHY DOES THIS BOTHER YOU SO MUCH, ADP?

I'll tell you why:

BECAUSE YOU GOT CAUGHT WITH LIE AFTER LIE AFTER LIE ABOUT WHAT EXACTLY THE SCOPE OF OUR FORMER DEBATE WAS. IT'S EMBARRASSING HOW MANY LIES YOU GOT CAUGHT IN. YOU KNOW IT AND I KNOW IT. YOU'VE CONTRADICTED SO MANY OF YOUR STATEMENTS IN THE PAST BECAUSE YOU ARE A DESPERATE, BROKEN MAN BECAUSE YOU LOST THAT DEBATE 4-0. IT'S BEEN OVER A YEAR AND YOU STILL HAVEN'T GOTTEN OVER IT THAT IS TRULY FUNNY AS FVVCK AND SAD AT THE SAME TIME. YOU ARE A SAD, SAD MAN. THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE TO LIE REPEATEDLY TO TRY TO COPE WITH LOSING AN E-BATTLE 4-0 IS THE MOST PATHETIC SHlT I'VE EVER WITNESSED IN MY LIFE. SERIOUSLY!

So if you want to continue embarrassing yourself, SO BE IT! YOU ARE GOING TO GET EXPOSED AND LAUGHED AT WHEN WE GET UNBIASED JUDGES TO LOOK AT THE PROOF OF WHAT THE SCOPE WAS. AND IT WON'T BE HARD TO PROVE. IT'S GOING TO BE SO FVVCKING EASY BEING THAT I HAVE DIRECT STATEMENTS FROM YOU, I HAVE DIRECT STATEMENTS FROM ME, I HAVE DIRECT STATEMENTS FROM THE JUDGES. SHOULDERROLL EVEN WAS ASKED ABOUT ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT WAS BROUGHT UP ABOUT THE SCOPE, AND HE SAID THE INFORMATION I PROVIDED SEEMED IDENTICAL TO YOURS. HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GET OUT OF THAT, ADP?

I KNOW HOW YOU PLAN TO GET OUT OF IT. BY LYING AND CHEATING. IT'S NOT GOING TO WORK. BUT I WELCOME YOU TO TRY.

SO ARE YOU IN OR NOT? STOP BEING A PVSSY AND STEP UP, LET THE JUDGES DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES WHAT WAS THE SCOPE, AND STOP LYING ABOUT IT OVER AND OVER. THE PEOPLE ON THIS SITE, UNLIKE YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT THEM, ARE QUITE CLEVER AND THEY ARE GOING TO SEE THROUGH YOU EASILY. YOU WILL NOT FOOL THEM AND THAT'S WHY YOU ARE SCARED TO LET INTELLIGENT PEOPLE REVIEW THE INFORMATION ON THEIR OWN AND DECIDE. YOU LITTLE BlTCH.

ACCEPT IT AND GET EMBARRASSED OR TUCK YOUR TAIL AND CHOKE ON THAT 4-0 LOSS. I'M WAITING.

[ADP02]

WHO?


Don't you get it? You are saying, don't I want proof?



DING DING DING!!!!


YOU PROVED IT ALREADY!!!!!!!


You PROVED it by YOUR ACTIONS!!!!






They are connected. I said it several times. So I am being consistent!



BUT




It is NOT the same TOPIC as the first debate. The SCOPE is different. The EXCLUSIONS are different.


IT is all SET




Just waiting for you, Travestyny:
To ACCEPT the NEW CHALLENGE
To ACCEPT THE NEW SCOPE

I ACCEPTED the EXCLUSIONs that you requested.
- Not about ABP testing for EPO
- Not about other non-threshold susbtances

THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE

,

YOU ALREADY POSTED THIS IN THE OTHER THREAD. Why are you trying to put on a show for other people? Are you embarrassed because you got caught out there.


THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE. HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO SAY I ACCEPT??????


The scope is about you having some kind of new information that proves that I lied and cheated to gain votes in our past debate, right?


Well part of the proof has to be....THE SCOPE OF OUR LAST DEBATE....OR HOW ELSE CAN YOU PROVE THAT I LIED AND CHEATED TO GAIN VOTES. TO GAIN VOTES ON WHAT? ON THE SCOPE OF OUR LAST DEBATE. THAT IS PART OF THE PROOF.


So it's very simple. The judges would have to know what the scope of our last debate was. WHY DOES THIS BOTHER YOU SO MUCH, ADP?

I'll tell you why:

BECAUSE YOU GOT CAUGHT WITH LIE AFTER LIE AFTER LIE ABOUT WHAT EXACTLY THE SCOPE OF OUR FORMER DEBATE WAS. IT'S EMBARRASSING HOW MANY LIES YOU GOT CAUGHT IN. YOU KNOW IT AND I KNOW IT. YOU'VE CONTRADICTED SO MANY OF YOUR STATEMENTS IN THE PAST BECAUSE YOU ARE A DESPERATE, BROKEN MAN BECAUSE YOU LOST THAT DEBATE 4-0. IT'S BEEN OVER A YEAR AND YOU STILL HAVEN'T GOTTEN OVER IT THAT IS TRULY FUNNY AS FVVCK AND SAD AT THE SAME TIME. YOU ARE A SAD, SAD MAN. THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE TO LIE REPEATEDLY TO TRY TO COPE WITH LOSING AN E-BATTLE 4-0 IS THE MOST PATHETIC SHlT I'VE EVER WITNESSED IN MY LIFE. SERIOUSLY!

So if you want to continue embarrassing yourself, SO BE IT! YOU ARE GOING TO GET EXPOSED AND LAUGHED AT WHEN WE GET UNBIASED JUDGES TO LOOK AT THE PROOF OF WHAT THE SCOPE WAS. AND IT WON'T BE HARD TO PROVE. IT'S GOING TO BE SO FVVCKING EASY BEING THAT I HAVE DIRECT STATEMENTS FROM YOU, I HAVE DIRECT STATEMENTS FROM ME, I HAVE DIRECT STATEMENTS FROM THE JUDGES. SHOULDERROLL EVEN WAS ASKED ABOUT ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT WAS BROUGHT UP ABOUT THE SCOPE, AND HE SAID THE INFORMATION I PROVIDED SEEMED IDENTICAL TO YOURS. HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GET OUT OF THAT, ADP?

I KNOW HOW YOU PLAN TO GET OUT OF IT. BY LYING AND CHEATING. IT'S NOT GOING TO WORK. BUT I WELCOME YOU TO TRY.

SO ARE YOU IN OR NOT? STOP BEING A PVSSY AND STEP UP, LET THE JUDGES DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES WHAT WAS THE SCOPE, AND STOP LYING ABOUT IT OVER AND OVER. THE PEOPLE ON THIS SITE, UNLIKE YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT THEM, ARE QUITE CLEVER AND THEY ARE GOING TO SEE THROUGH YOU EASILY. YOU WILL NOT FOOL THEM AND THAT'S WHY YOU ARE SCARED TO LET INTELLIGENT PEOPLE REVIEW THE INFORMATION ON THEIR OWN AND DECIDE. YOU LITTLE BlTCH.

ACCEPT IT AND GET EMBARRASSED OR TUCK YOUR TAIL AND CHOKE ON THAT 4-0 LOSS. I'M WAITING.

TOTAL BS!!!!


Either you ACCEPT or YOU DO NOT.


You are saying, I ACCEPT BUT …… WTF!!!!


This is ABOUT YOU stating what the CAS panel meant about those statements that you posted. There is a connection with the OLD debate because you said it there too and DUPED the judges. ALL FACTs!!!!


The WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE is NEW!!!!!


You are saying that EPO testing CANNOT have any threshold type tests and anyone who has called it that is WRONG.



That is the CHALLENGE. It is a DIFFERENT than the previous CHALLENGE.




DO YOU ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE and SCOPE?

[travestyny]

TOTAL BS!!!!


Either you ACCEPT or YOU DO NOT.


You are saying, I ACCEPT BUT …… WTF!!!!


This is ABOUT YOU stating what the CAS panel meant about those statements that you posted. There is a connection with the OLD debate because you said it there too and DUPED the judges. ALL FACTs!!!!


The WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE is NEW!!!!!


You are saying that EPO testing CANNOT have any threshold type tests and anyone who has called it that is WRONG.



That is the CHALLENGE. It is a DIFFERENT than the previous CHALLENGE.




DO YOU ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE and SCOPE?

If I duped the judges with it, then prove it!!!!!! What is so hard about that, ADP. You are saying I duped the judges in our debate.


WHY ARE YOU SO HESITANT IF YOU THINK I CHEATED YOU. I TOLD YOU ALREADY. I ACCEPT. LET'S LET THE JUDGES LOOK AT THE INFORMATION FROM OUR DEBATE. STOP DUCKING AND HIDING LIKE A PVSSY. WHY ARE YOU SO SCARED? DUPED THE JUDGES ABOUT WHAT, ADP?

And tell me, what is this "can" business? You said we discussed "can" over 2 months. PROVE IT. Show us the proof of that conversation over multiple posts. Did we discuss how Quest Labs tests for EPO? Did we discuss how any other labs do? Did we discuss at any given time period?

STEP UP AND STOP BEING A BlTCH. YOU ARE CLEARLY TRYING TO HIDE SOMETHING. I TOLD YOU I'M DOWN FOR ALL THE MARBLES! YOU WANT TO GET BACK AT ME FOR FVVCKING YOU UP WITH THAT 4-0 VICTORY RIGHT? YES OR NO? WELL HERE IS YOUR CHANCE. I ACCEPT THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE. BACK UP YOUR STATEMENTS. SHOW YOUR NEW INFORMATION AND PROVE THAT I DUPED THE JUDGES. BUT STOP LYING ABOUT YOUR 'CAN' VAGUE BULLSHlT. I HAVE SO MUCH PROOF THAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT THAT BEING THE SCOPE OF OUR DEBATE THAT IT'S NOT EVEN FUNNY. YOU DON'T WANT ME TO SHOW THAT BECAUSE YOU KNOW THAT ONCE THE JUDGES LOOK AT THE INFO. FROM THE DEBATE, THEY WILL SEE THAT THE SCOPE WAS NEVER 'CAN...' AND THEN YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO SAY THAT YOU WERE CHEATED BECAUSE ALL OF MY INFORMATION WILL HOLD UP. YOU CAN'T FOOL ME, SON.


STOP BEING A BlTCH AND LET THE JUDGES DO THEIR JOB. WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO TIE THEM TO YOUR LIE AND DEFLECTION. YOU'RE A STRAIGHT UP PVSSY. AGREE TO LET THE JUDGES LOOK INTO THE DEBATE ON THEIR OWN, ADP. HOW COULD THIS BOTHER YOU SO MUCH

Willy Wanker Challenge -- YOU SAID I DON'T WANT TO DISCUSS IT BECAUSE IT PROVES THAT I CHEATED. WELL I'M HERE SAYING LET'S DISCUSS IT AND SEE WHETHER I CHEATED OR NOT. ARE YOU BACKING DOWN FROM THIS?????? AWWWW, WHAT'S THE MATTER? AFRAID THAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE EXPOSED FOR THOSE LIES, HUH? LMAOOOOOOO!
THE MORE YOU FIGHT ME OVER THIS, THE MORE THAT YOU REVEAL THAT IT'S YOU THAT IS LYING AND IT'S YOU THAT IS FULL OF SHlT!

[ADP02]

If I duped the judges with it, then prove it!!!!!! What is so hard about that, ADP. You are saying I duped the judges in our debate.


WHY ARE YOU SO HESITANT IF YOU THINK I CHEATED YOU. I TOLD YOU ALREADY. I ACCEPT. LET'S LET THE JUDGES LOOK AT THE INFORMATION FROM OUR DEBATE. STOP DUCKING AND HIDING LIKE A PVSSY. WHY ARE YOU SO SCARED? DUPED THE JUDGES ABOUT WHAT, ADP?

And tell me, what is this "can" business? You said we discussed "can" over 2 months. PROVE IT. Show us the proof of that conversation over multiple posts. Did we discuss how Quest Labs tests for EPO? Did we discuss how any other labs do? Did we discuss at any given time period?

STEP UP AND STOP BEING A BlTCH. YOU ARE CLEARLY TRYING TO HIDE SOMETHING. I TOLD YOU I'M DOWN FOR ALL THE MARBLES! YOU WANT TO GET BACK AT ME FOR FVVCKING YOU UP WITH THAT 4-0 VICTORY RIGHT? YES OR NO? WELL HERE IS YOUR CHANCE. I ACCEPT THE WILLY WANKER CHALLENGE. BACK UP YOUR STATEMENTS. SHOW YOUR NEW INFORMATION AND PROVE THAT I DUPED THE JUDGES. BUT STOP LYING ABOUT YOUR 'CAN' VAGUE BULLSHlT. I HAVE SO MUCH PROOF THAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT THAT BEING THE SCOPE OF OUR DEBATE THAT IT'S NOT EVEN FUNNY. YOU DON'T WANT ME TO SHOW THAT BECAUSE YOU KNOW THAT ONCE THE JUDGES LOOK AT THE INFO. FROM THE DEBATE, THEY WILL SEE THAT THE SCOPE WAS NEVER 'CAN...' AND THEN YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO SAY THAT YOU WERE CHEATED BECAUSE ALL OF MY INFORMATION WILL HOLD UP. YOU CAN'T FOOL ME, SON.


STOP BEING A BlTCH AND LET THE JUDGES DO THEIR JOB. WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO TIE THEM TO YOUR LIE AND DEFLECTION. YOU'RE A STRAIGHT UP PVSSY. AGREE TO LET THE JUDGES LOOK INTO THE DEBATE ON THEIR OWN, ADP. HOW COULD THIS BOTHER YOU SO MUCH

Willy Wanker Challenge -- YOU SAID I DON'T WANT TO DISCUSS IT BECAUSE IT PROVES THAT I CHEATED. WELL I'M HERE SAYING LET'S DISCUSS IT AND SEE WHETHER I CHEATED OR NOT. ARE YOU BACKING DOWN FROM THIS?????? AWWWW, WHAT'S THE MATTER? AFRAID THAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE EXPOSED FOR THOSE LIES, HUH? LMAOOOOOOO!
THE MORE YOU FIGHT ME OVER THIS, THE MORE THAT YOU REVEAL THAT IT'S YOU THAT IS LYING AND IT'S YOU THAT IS FULL OF SHlT!

Did you say this?


You are saying that EPO testing CANNOT have any threshold type tests and anyone who has called it that is WRONG.





We have argued that for 2 months!!!!!







I want you to prove that in front of the judges.


Do you ACCEPT the CHALLENGE as per this thread?


QUACK QUACK QUACK!!!!

DUCKER!!!!

[travestyny]

Did you say this?


You are saying that EPO testing CANNOT have any threshold type tests and anyone who has called it that is WRONG.





We have argued that for 2 months!!!!!







I want you to prove that in front of the judges.


Do you ACCEPT the CHALLENGE as per this thread?


QUACK QUACK QUACK!!!!

DUCKER!!!!

I THINK I FOUND WHY YOU KEPT BRINGING UP CAN.

Again, here you are saying rEPO exceeds threshold limits.


Can rEPO be below threshold limits according to the WADA TD2014EPO document, ADP?


Waiting

IS THAT WHAT YOU WANTED TO CHALLENGE ME ON? LET ME KNOW, BRO. BY THE WAY, THAT WAS IN JUNE. YOUR THREAD BEGAN IN JULY, IN CASE YOU WANT TO SAY I'M BACKTRACKING. HMMMMM. SO IT SEEMS WE MIGHT HAVE A DEBATE AFTERALL, IF YOU DON'T PVSSY OUT!

I'M DOWN FOR IT. IF YOU AREN'T DOWN FOR IT, THEN FEEL FREE TO TUCK YOUR TAIL BlTCH!

QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK

[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[ADP02]

Did you say this?


You are saying that EPO testing CANNOT have any threshold type tests and anyone who has called it that is WRONG.





We have argued that for 2 months!!!!!







I want you to prove that in front of the judges.


Do you ACCEPT the CHALLENGE as per this thread?


QUACK QUACK QUACK!!!!

DUCKER!!!!

I THINK I FOUND WHY YOU KEPT BRINGING UP CAN.






IS THAT WHAT YOU WANTED TO CHALLENGE ME ON? LET ME KNOW, BRO.

I'M DOWN FOR IT. IF YOU AREN'T DOWN FOR IT, THEN FEEL FREE TO TUCK YOUR TAIL BlTCH!

QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK QUACK

Poor guy. He is looking at old posts to prove what?



See, you CANNOT ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE.






We have over 70+ pages as PROOF that you have


DUCKED









.