Plus it's not for you to say if the judges were duped or not. You're not exactly an unbiased observer, are you?
But if you feel like you can present your points more clearly and in a more organized fashion then you should ask for a rematch. Travestyny seems down for it.
I often disagree with judges... but I abide by there decision...
You might to Wong/right... i gave my opinion... I watched the fight in slow mo....pac lost..lmayweather beat him..we can see the same thing and interpret it differently....on that day, ployd beat pac in a lac luster fight...
Turns out that ADP is a bigger bltch than even I thought.
I just exposed that his whole "new debate" idea was just a carry over of the last debate. He thought he could use an old, discontinued criteria to fit his agenda.
Zaroku, remember how he cried for pages and pages claiming that I was trying to change the scope and wouldn't stick to the scope.
Well, I just found a quotation from him claiming that that old criteria was in fact NOT IN THE SCOPE.
Originally posted by ADP02
2)WHILE OUT OF SCOPE, this specific criteria had an "and/OR" in which the panel was describing. In that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using EPO, it can be used.
Can you guess what this fool had the nerve to say????
Turns out that ADP is a bigger bltch than even I thought.
I just exposed that his whole "new debate" idea was just a carry over of the last debate. He thought he could use an old, discontinued criteria to fit his agenda.
Zaroku, remember how he cried for pages and pages claiming that I was trying to change the scope and wouldn't stick to the scope.
Well, I just found a quotation from him claiming that that old criteria was in fact NOT IN THE SCOPE.
Can you guess what this fool had the nerve to say????
So before it was stick to the scope...fast forward 1.5 years later, and somehow in his head I changed the scope....and he accepted.
This dude is an absolute scumbag. That debate ruined his life!
And he still won't give me the points he owes.
Don't count on it bruh. Floyd will rather keep his fluke win which he barely won against an injured torn rotator, Pac, what more with a 2 armed Pac with a right hook pop. Floyd won't risk losing this time, he already did a Houdini with all that running and hugging.. He knows another one will be a tall order. He should just retire for good.
ADP02, even Zaroku remembers that for pages and pages you kept crying and accusing me of trying to change the scope.
So now, YOU JUST GOT EXPOSED. It was always YOU who was trying to change the scope. You are a lying scumbag! How ****** and desperate were you to actually try to argue that I changed the scope just so you can try to fit your agenda? One that you're still wrong about anyway!
You try to come across as a decent dude, but you are the most dishonest person I've ever met. You have issues.
GIVE ME THE POINTS THAT YOU OWE. YOU GOT EXPOSED. ALL OF THAT CHEATING, DISHONEST, DUCKING, DEFLECTING SHlT YOU TALK...IT'S ALL ABOUT YOU!!!!!! THE PROOF HAS EXPOSED YOU!!!
Don't count on it bruh. Floyd will rather keep his fluke win which he barely won against an injured torn rotator, Pac, what more with a 2 armed Pac with a right hook pop. Floyd won't risk losing this time, he already did a Houdini with all that running and hugging.. He knows another one will be a tall order. He should just retire for good.
Close thread. Sorry pact@rds your leader is a FRAUD.
Comment