Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[travestyny]

[Vadrigar.]

[img]//media.*****.com/media/GwMrIlacncflu/*****.gif[/img]

[Vadrigar.]

[travestyny]

He deleted his channel because the Kovalev result was too much to bear. Dude probably jumped off a cliff.

I heard you finally saw the light about the White Supremacist, Precise Presenter, huh?

[Vadrigar.]

I heard you finally saw the light about the White Supremacist, Precise Presenter, huh?

He eventually showed his true colours. However I agree with his stance on May vs Pac and just because he's a racist doesn't mean he is wrong about the outcome of a particular fight. Also just because I agree with him one thing doesn't mean I have to agree every view he holds.

[travestyny]

He eventually showed his true colours. However I agree with his stance on May vs Pac and just because he's a racist doesn't mean he is wrong about the outcome of a particular fight. Also just because I agree with him one thing doesn't mean I have to agree every view he holds.

I for one never said you have to agree with everything he says. But you definitely were propping up his videos, which if you watched completely, even in the last video, the final thing he said, after saying it was clearly for Pac, was that he believed it was very close and he only made the videos to **** with people who thought Mayweahther won it easily. He was a racist clown.

But anyway, you are entitled to think Manny won. I got no problem with that. But above you were talking about how many "true boxing fans" believe Manny won. Fact of the matter is, more "true boxing fans," boxers, trainers, media etc. think Floyd won. I'll just leave it at that.

[Vadrigar.]

I for one never said you have to agree with everything he says. But you definitely were propping up his videos, which if you watched completely, even in the last video, the final thing he said, after saying it was clearly for Pac, was that he believed it was very close and he only made the videos to **** with people who thought Mayweahther won it easily. He was a racist clown.

But anyway, you are entitled to think Manny won. I got no problem with that. But above you were talking about how many "true boxing fans" believe Manny won. Fact of the matter is, more "true boxing fans," boxers, trainers, media etc. think Floyd won. I'll just leave it at that.

His videos are gone so I can't go back and check that. However I never solely relied on his videos for my argument, it was through my own judgement. As for my last sentence I was just goading.

[SonnyboyReturns]

Chronicles of the Biggest sports Heist in History
(This thread proves Pac got robbed.)

When there is a crime you look at clues of events that transpired.You trace the evidences that are left.

People Lie, but what doesn't lie are evidences trapped in time in a form of a video of the truth that transpired in that strange night of boxing.

It's very obvious when you watch the fight that Mayweather was missing badly, but the judges were counting them.

Slowmo video is meant to show who really connected in that round and who truly deserved it. It is even more accurate because you can tell which punches really connected throughout the fight.

We need to spread this brilliant video so the fans can see who really won the fight. But I knew the fight was a joke from the beginning because Pacquiao wasn't gonna get his hands raised in Vegas.

Here is the truth. The rounds that should have gone to Manny. Rounds that if it were counted correctly. It would have made it 9-4 for Pac,

Since these 8 rounds in these videos were given to floyd, when in fact it shouldnt have.

There are 5 videos, of 8 rounds, rounds 2,3,6,7,8,9,10,12
in these videos.

Rounds 2,3,7,8,12 were given to Floyd unanimously (video disputed)

Rounds 9,10 only 1 judge gave to Floyd (video disputed)

Round 4 and 6 are unanimous to Pac on all 3 judges.

The 7 rounds are in question. If Pac gets the 7 rounds plus the 2 unanimous rounds. It's a 9/3 Pac.

Judge for yourself.

Unbiased video showing all of landed shots of both parties per 3 minute round. Unedited, unspliced round by round documented shots.

Enjoy! Pac was the true winner.

'THE ART OF HIT AND NOT GET HIT'

Round 2



Round 3



Round 6,7,8



Those who want to dispute the author's work. Time stamp it and let's discuss, but I assure you it's all there in it's purest form.

Enjoy!

after carefully reviewing all your evidence I have to admit you convinced me. pac did infact beat floyd on that night. many people were fooled and got the wrong impression....

thanks for your persistence and dedication towards this issue.

[Vadrigar.]

[Vadrigar.]

Punch statistics prove Floyd Mayweather was fortunate to beat Manny Pacquiao by unanimous decision

As the purses for the Non-Fight of the Century go through the stratosphere never mind the roof – latest projections $240million for Floyd Mayweather and $160m for Manny Pacquiao – so the scoring of Mr Money’s victory falls deeper into question.
The more pay-per-view returns come in from around the US – currently well over four million US buys at $99.95 a pop – the greater the certainty that we have just witnessed the marketing miracle of The Half-Billion Dollar Fight.
The more intently the tapes of the fight are scrutinised the greater the head-scratching about the unanimous decision in favour of Mayweather.

One dedicated website in America, Boxing News 24, sat its leading commentators down to monitor the video, first at actual speed, then in slow motion, finally frame by frame.
The task was prompted initially by astonishment at the official fight statistics, which among other anomalies proclaimed that Pacquiao had connected with less than 20 per cent of his total punches and only nine per cent of his jabs.
So they decided to tally every blow and in so doing came up with startling numbers which multiply long-standing doubts about the validity of the punch stats, as well as concerns about the verdict itself.

Only by bending over backwards to give Mayweather the benefit of one statistically equal round, by virtue of his higher work rate in those three minutes, and another in which he landed one less punch but would have got the hometown nod could he have achieved even so much as a draw.
Mark that second round 10-10 and the ninth 9-10 and Pacquiao would be their clear winner.

For what it’s worth, I caused something of a stir by scoring the fight a 115-115 draw from my privileged vantage point at ringside.
These were the final tallies of the three official judges, all in favour of Mayweather: Glenn Feldman 116-112. Burt Clements 116-112. Dave Moretti 118-110
These are the website tallies, calibrated round-by-round according to punches thrown, punches landed, the score for each round, with Mayweather’s stats first:



The conclusions here include:
1) The fight was far closer than the judges, especially Moretti, and most pundits perceived
2) Many rounds were exceptionally difficult if not too close to call.
3) The punch stats as counted in the heat of the night are profoundly suspect (one US commentator who had Pacquaio winning asked if they were compiled by ‘kids from the HBO and Showtime offices’ and was told ‘Yes.’)
4) Pacquiao’s claim that he had won the fight was reasonable, not outrageous as the in-ring interviewer implied.
5) If watching on television, maybe better to mute the sound commentary.
6) Mayweather is very wise to keep insisting on home-town advantage in Las Vegas, which benefits from the huge economic impact of his fights.