Originally posted by travestyny
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow
Collapse
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostWhat the actual **** does any of that have to do with his statements? Go respond to my post with the video and the quotations. Let's see what you got from his video.
I shouldnt even be talking to you. It's time for you to face the music. My gatekeeper awaits. Or are you ducking again?? You really are a fan of Floyd. You follow him to the T lolololol
Comment
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostThanks Spoon for the support.
I read a few of your posts ..... while I do not know if its stacked right now but TRAVESTYNY certainly was headed in that direction with Hanzgruuber and El Panda and the Shoulder Roll providing the list of judges ....
I just hope that there are no Dave Moretti's that will be judging in the Thunderdome. That is, I hope it will be fair.
BTW - Cong**** on over 5000 posts in this thread!
.
I read a few pages of the thread, Travesty even saying this is not a floyd Pac topic since it was epo you were talking about, but that is from the very start a false pretense, since it is connected to floyd and Pac. Meaning, if he wins, floyd's win is cleared up, if he loses, floyd's win will be tainted amongst the jury and judges and on lookers in that kangaroo court. The thing is, will Floyd divl lickers allow him to lose? Off course not Adp02, that is mock court infested with Floyd lickers. In short a banana republic, carefully designed to deny your arguments.
You should have stayed here my friend. This is the teal thunderdome. 5000 posts, 500 pages, 167,000 says that this issue has no closure. You lnow and I know to damn well, Pac has an argument for winning this fight, sadly, Flpyd is too ***** to take the challenge, and would rather fight a non boxer lol
Anyway, I suggest you gtfo of that kangaroo court. You're surrounded by floyd jizz guzzlers. You'll be trapped in Fll0mo wonderland in their lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostSorry but you are not being accurate here. I told you that I responded and for you to do the same. You started to answer but its not that you stopped because of me? You just DEFLECTED and DEFLECTED!
You, on the other hand, claimed you would answer my question in the dome, then when you got there, you said it was never about that.
Great answer.
You showed who the real deflector is. It was never about the original question that I asked you a zillion times? Lol. Coward.Last edited by travestyny; 04-02-2017, 11:39 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spoon23 View PostMan that's some Kangaroo court you've got yourself into. That is a commision of Fl0mos wanting to infeltrate a clean system and infect it with Fl0mo virus corrupting your good word my Man lmao
I read a few pages of the thread, Travesty even saying this is not a floyd Pac topic since it was epo you were talking about, but that is from the very start a false pretense, since it is connected to floyd and Pac. Meaning, if he wins, floyd's win is cleared up, if he loses, floyd's win will be tainted amongst the jury and judges and on lookers in that kangaroo court. The thing is, will Floyd divl lickers allow him to lose? Off course not Adp02, that is mock court infested with Floyd lickers. In short a banana republic, carefully designed to deny your arguments.
You should have stayed here my friend. This is the teal thunderdome. 5000 posts, 500 pages, 167,000 says that this issue has no closure. You lnow and I know to damn well, Pac has an argument for winning this fight, sadly, Flpyd is too ***** to take the challenge, and would rather fight a non boxer lol
Anyway, I suggest you gtfo of that kangaroo court. You're surrounded by floyd jizz guzzlers. You'll be trapped in Fll0mo wonderland in their lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spoon23 View PostIt's called critical thinking. Sorry to say. You have none.
I shouldnt even be talking to you. It's time for you to face the music. My gatekeeper awaits. Or are you ducking again?? You really are a fan of Floyd. You follow him to the T lolololol
Yup, I thought so. Your author was further exposed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostBullshlt. I told you the info you gave me wasn't enough for an accurate answer.
You, on the other hand, claimed you would answer my question in the dome, then when you got there, you said it was never about that.
Great answer.
YOU made it out to be that. I never said that it had anything to do with that document that YOU read and pointed out to me.
Like usual, I will be eventually responding but you will keep on DEFLECTING!!! So, perhaps I need to start rethinking about all this!
Comment
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostThanks Spoon. You may be very well right with this one. I know that it surely started looking out that way. Lets just see how it rolls now that I'm there. As you just said, it may be a lose, lose type situation.
I even allowed you to deflect to a different topic. What the **** do you have to complain about?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostCorrection.
YOU made it out to be that. I never said that it had anything to do with that document that YOU read and pointed out to me.
Like usual, I will be eventually responding but you will keep on DEFLECTING!!! So, perhaps I need to start rethinking about all this!
Cowardly, no?
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostSo what you're saying is that you refused to answer the question I asked you, but pretended you would answer it in the dome.
Cowardly, no?
While I always respond, AND YOU KNOW THAT .... being the way you are handling this and knowing that YOU are the one that is called the DEFLECTOR, I may need to rethink on this one ......
Comment
Comment