Originally posted by travestyny
View Post
Are you now moving on to challenge number 6?
I already gave you the responses. It should have been enough to answer your initial question and many of your deflecting questions.
Here is the response to your answer. You said, how can a doctor want to give medication to an athlete who was fine?
I have been asking you this question since we found out about Floyd's IV scandal and YOU DEFLECTED to Floyd's doctor's note being good enough for you even though it is in conflict WITH ALL THE EVIDENCE that we have.
YOU said but Manny was said to be fine? While you are delusional and I responded to your nonsense ....
Well, Floyd was not just fine, we have proof that he was fine!!!!!
vital signs: Normal
Weight: Rock solid stable for 30 days (Floyd says for a decade!!!!)
Making 147: Admitted to making it easy
Excuses by Floyd: Do not add up.
- Giving urine 4 days beforehand contributed to severe dehydration in which required an IV?
- Giving < 1 tbsps. 10 days beforehand contributed to severe dehydration in which required an IV?
- Was interviewed saying that he was relaxing his FINAL DAYS before the fight yet said exercising contributed?
- We saw Floyd drinking.
- Floyd was ABLE to drink orally
- Pre-fight form: says No serious medical condition
- NSAC: No notifications of serious medical condition
- NSAC doctor: No notifications of serious medical condition
- NSAC doctor examination: No serious medical condition
- Floyd's interviews: April 30, "I feel great. Training camp WAS great"
- NO prior TUE approval
Nobody officially knew until 3 weeks after the fight ..... and then all they received was Floyd's BS doctor's note.
All of the above PLUS head of the WADA TUE Committee said you do NOT give a RETRO TUE unless its URGENT and also points out if you cannot drink orally and we saw Floyd drinking orally
"They gave Floyd a RETRO TUE and only came to light 21 days after the fight. Wow, USADA is doing that because they are getting paid. USADA is supposed to be a body that is supposed to be completely independent. Wow, its a murky world. Yes it is murky and quite frankly sensed disappointment.
"When it comes to RETRO TUEs". Made only when you do not have enough time to apply. Lets say someone gets injured on the field and goes to surgery that night .... and post-op they give him drugs. Its totally acceptable. You get the anesthetists report, the surgeons report then you put all that on the TUE form. Perfectly acceptable. That is what a RETRO TUE is all about. An URGENT .... Someone has an anaphylactic allergic reaction and needs the drugs (URGENTLY). Right, that is not someone who is going to play at tennis open final or race at the Tour de France. No (its not for that). That is when I challenge the system. Its a red flag."
"I TOTALLY AGREE. It doesn't smell right to me. To enable you to compete, you get a RETRO TUE to get an IV? What were they giving him and why couldn't they rehydrate him orally, clinically, that is what we do. You do not need an IV unless you are vomiting and have diarrheas and cannot drink orally and if that all happens then you will not be entering the ring against Manny Pacquiao."
Comment