Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[b Murphington]

Here's more B morph

Close your eyes Floyd. It's gonna hurt.



for added drama and to get my point across to B morph.

[IMG]//media4.*****.com/media/jldRfyCRiLKnK/200.gif[/IMG]

Here, I'll actually post something that's unbiased, unlike your salty ass.

I'll also tell you why Pacquiao lost, and no, it's not because he got outboxed and did a **** job, cuz he didn't. He actually fought well. And no, he didn't lose because of an injured shoulder, cuz that's a fake ass excuse cooked up by Arum and anyone who believes that is a sheep.

The real reason is because Pacquiao didn't do what everyone thought he would do. Pacquiao was thought to be Mayweather's kriptonite. The one to take the 0 in spectacular fashion. Everyone was calling for Mayweather to get KTFO. Pacquiao didn't look like the old Pacquiao, he failed. Pacquiao didn't accomplish his mission. Didn't happen. At the end of the fight, we got lackluster action from both guys. We got an okay fight, but didn't come anywhere close to expectations. The boxing world lost that night.

[Spoon23]

B Morph,

You told me to show proof Floyd got hurt and I'm salty?? lol I think your the one who's salty. You asked for an incident Floyd got hurt since you said there was none. I show several proof that he did get hurt, and then you cry foul and divert the topic to something else.

Acknowledge your boy got hurt and we can change topic.

Don't be Salty now. YDKSAB if you cant tell when a fighter is hurt. I'm just a messenger of truth here bud. Videos don't lie.


# 9-4 Pac. Disputed rounds shows proof of Pac connecting the more clean effective punches per round In the fight. ( go to page 1 )

[Spoon23]

B Morph,

Punching is the name of the game in boxing. I have shown proof Pac connected the more clean and effective punching that night, not to mention the more punches per rounds in this fight. (Go to page 1 all there)

That said. To have effective aggression, you have to hit your opponent with clean effective punching, more so than your opponent per round. - Pac did

Ring generalship- ring generalship is he who controls the center of the ring and controls his opponent to place him were he wants him to be and while doing that landing the more effective blows than his opponent. - Pac again did that. He commanded the center of the ring pushed Floyd back whenever he wants to over and over to the ropes for 12 rounds while doing so also landed the cleaner more effective punches.

Defense- defense is to not get hit, so who did get hit more throughout the fight? As I have proven in this thread Floyd got hit more per round. Shows who's defense had more holes.

Even if you have aggression if you can't hit your opponent effectively your aggression is not an effective aggression.

Even if your ring generalship, but you can't land effectively on your opponent then your ring generalship ain't that great.

Defense, if you get hit more than your opponent. Then your defense is weaker than your opponent.

You cannot have good ring generalship, good defense, effective aggression if you hit less than your opponent.

Pac did that with flying colors. He Landed the significant punches, landed the cleaner more effective punches and above all landed the more punches.

I've shown poof landed the more significant punches per rounds that were disputed. showed proof who was the ring general, effective aggressor, and who had the better defense that night is the one who got hit less by his opponent. All Pacquiao.

# acknowledge Floyd got hurt first and only then can you go to this topic and Try to dispute these videos that up to this day 75k viewers have seen it. None can dispute the truth in these videos.

# videos don't lie

9-4 Pac was the true winner that night.

[b Murphington]

B Morph,

You told me to show proof Floyd got hurt and I'm salty?? lol I think your the one who's salty. You asked for an incident Floyd got hurt since you said there was none. I show several proof that he did get hurt, and then you cry foul and divert the topic to something else.

Acknowledge your boy got hurt and we can change topic.

Don't be Salty now. YDKSAB if you cant tell when a fighter is hurt. I'm just a messenger of truth here bud. Videos don't lie.


# 9-4 Pac. Disputed rounds shows proof of Pac connecting the more clean effective punches per round In the fight. ( go to page 1 )

Okay good. Those videos show proof that he was hurt. Then answer me this, was he hurt for long, or did he prove that he has a solid chin and recovered almost instantly? Pacquiao couldn't sustain a substantial attack and that's why he lost on the scorecards. He couldn't do any better than De La Hoya. He was only effective in spurts.

You show video evidence of Pacquiao being effective only in spurts and you act like that's how the fight played out the entire 36 minutes and that's just not the case. It's false and you know it. Pac looked like an ordinary fighter because he couldn't do what everyone expected him to do.

[b Murphington]

I heard all Pac lovers saying before the fight that Pacquiao was gonna KO Floyd. That he was going to hit the floor numerous times. That Pac was gonna make Floyd quit on the stool. He didn't.

The truth is that Maidana, Corrales, De La Hoya, and Cotto all did better than Pacquiao did.

The bar was set too high for Pacquiao and he didn't meet those high expectations. That's why he lost.

[Spoon23]

The real reason is because Pacquiao didn't do what everyone thought he would do.

So what your saying. Since Pac wasn't the Pac of old that night since he was chasing a pigeon. He shouldn't win, even if video facts shows he did enough to out punch Floyd for 12 rounds.

So since Pac is set at a higher standard of perfection. He should lose even if..

He landed the cleaner and more effective punches that night.. Even if the Ring generalship was Pac's - he owned the center of the ring place Floyd were he wants to. Even if, He was he effective aggressor, even if, Pac had the better defense that night since he was hit less than Floyd can ever do to him.


As I've explained thoroughly in my top post.

If your argument is that Pac wasn't himself that night. Yes he wasn't since he threw less than his normal punch output since he aggravated his torn rotator cuff injury in the fight. STILL he did enough to land more than Floyd could ever do for the entire fight. If not being himself is the reason he lost. That's just lame bud. A fight can be ugly or boring, but the real winner still is the won who dished out the more hurt in the hurt business and connected more in the business of punching.

[Spoon23]

Okay good. Those videos show proof that he was hurt. Then answer me this, was he hurt for long, or did he prove that he has a solid chin and recovered almost instantly? Pacquiao couldn't sustain a substantial attack and that's why he lost on the scorecards. He couldn't do any better than De La Hoya. He was only effective in spurts.

You show video evidence of Pacquiao being effective only in spurts and you act like that's how the fight played out the entire 36 minutes and that's just not the case. It's false and you know it. Pac looked like an ordinary fighter because he couldn't do what everyone expected him to do.

Never said Floyd went down. It's you bringing that up if Floyd got hurt. What this thread shows is who truly deserves the win. I never mentioned Floyd went down or got ktfo.

I showed video evidence of what you were asking. That's why they were jpegs

Now, video proof of the rounds disputed with the whole 3 minute of every round is on page one with thorough punch score for both combatants. Not spliced. All the action is in there.

9-3 Pac.

# dispute it if you can

# 75k viewers none can dispute the truth in those videos.

[Spoon23]

I heard all Pac lovers saying before the fight that Pacquiao was gonna KO Floyd. That he was going to hit the floor numerous times. That Pac was gonna make Floyd quit on the stool. He didn't.

The truth is that Maidana, Corrales, De La Hoya, and Cotto all did better than Pacquiao did.

The bar was set too high for Pacquiao and he didn't meet those high expectations. That's why he lost.

Wtf is this??

Since Pac couldn't KO Floyd he shouldn't win?

Since Maidana, Corrales, Dlahoya, and Cotto put more hurt on Floyd Pac should lose?

Did you even ask yourself, did Floyd hurt Pac more than Pac hurt him?

That's all that matters in the ring. Who hurt who more. Who connected more against each other?

The answer to that is Pac hurt Floyd more than Floyd hurt him.


Maidana, Corrales, Dlahoya, and Cotto, has nothing to do with the fight since they weren't in the ring with Floyd or Pac that night.

That said,

Pac did better to Hatton, Mosley, Delahoya, Cotto than Floyd can ever do to them. Does that mean Pac won it because of that? Lol

NO!

Pac won it coz he connected the more cleaner and effective punches that night. Not to mention the more punches rough out the fight with effective aggression, ring generalship and good defense.

Case closed.

[Zaroku]

I heard all Pac lovers saying before the fight that Pacquiao was gonna KO Floyd. That he was going to hit the floor numerous times. That Pac was gonna make Floyd quit on the stool. He didn't.

The truth is that Maidana, Corrales, De La Hoya, and Cotto all did better than Pacquiao did.

The bar was set too high for Pacquiao and he didn't meet those high expectations. That's why he lost.

Exactly!

Mosley nearly had Floyd down..... But no!!!
Castillo, Maidana, Cotto applied hurt to Floyd!

[b Murphington]

Never said Floyd went down. It's you bringing that up if Floyd got hurt. What this thread shows is who truly one. I never mentioned Floyd went down of got ktfo.

I showed video evidence of what you were asking. That's why they were jpegs

Now, video proof of the rounds disputed with the whole 3 minute of every round is on page one with thorough punch score for both combatants. Not spliced. All the action is in there.

9-3 Pac.

# dispute it if you can

# 75k viewers none can dispute the truth in those videos.

Even Roach believes his star pupil lost. HBO, a pro Pacquiao broadcasting team believe he convincingly lost. Almost everyone at ringside thought he lost. You're pro Pac. No matter what would've happened in the fight, you already had your mind set on Pacquiao winning. People will believe what they want to believe. I watched the fight with a backyard full of Floyd hating Mexicans and they had Floyd winning. No one thought Floyd lost that night.

Show me whatever video evidence you want and put whatever spin you want on it, cuz it doesn't matter. State your case, try to rewrite what happened that night. Slow motion with no sound. Bring your case up with the boxing commissions and show them what you found and try to get the results changed. Go ahead.