Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Post
    "They post highly biased videos and demand that these videos be the gold standard." please allow me to use this to address you, reloaded and others...

    now, that is really a stretch.....

    highly biased videos?

    in what way? were the videos tampered? spliced? manipulated? were the videos taken by or from the videos commentator? if all your answers are Yes to all these questions, then show proof.....

    if all your answers to the above questions are NO and your beef is with the commentator play videos on mute mode...then dispute the videos as per spoon's instruction...he is entitled to set the rules...it is his thread....

    and if you find spoon's rules very limiting and he stand pat on his rules, then respect him and contribute to the thread per his rules...or leave this thread..

    and if you and others find my posts offensive too, or not to your liking, so be it...

    but it is never polite to twist or pretend to know better what a poster is really trying to say in his posts; and resort to misplaced bravado - as if you know and can tell where the fountain of youth is....

    nostradamus is long dead....
    Floyd cheated, Manny lost, slow motion are not how fights are judged.

    Providing a limited context of viewing any fight is biased.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
      Floyd cheated, Manny lost, slow motion are not how fights are judged.

      Providing a limited context of viewing any fight is biased.
      Limited?

      More like detailed bud.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
        Floyd cheated, Manny lost, slow motion are not how fights are judged.

        Providing a limited context of viewing any fight is biased.
        " slow motion are not how fights are judged."

        are we not just reviewing the fight? tell me, buddy...how do we review a fight? is it terribly wrong to watch it in slow mo, if available? will playing the fight in slow mo alter what really happened between the fighters that night? or allow the reviewer to get a clearer picture of what happened? what gives?

        or, do we just invite the 3 judges and bayless when we want to review this fight?

        Comment


          Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Post
          "They post highly biased videos and demand that these videos be the gold standard." please allow me to use this to address you, reloaded and others...

          now, that is really a stretch.....

          highly biased videos?

          in what way? were the videos tampered? spliced? manipulated? were the videos taken by or from the videos commentator? if all your answers are Yes to all these questions, then show proof.....

          if all your answers to the above questions are NO and your beef is with the commentator play videos on mute mode...then dispute the videos as per spoon's instruction...he is entitled to set the rules...it is his thread....

          and if you find spoon's rules very limiting and he stand pat on his rules, then respect him and contribute to the thread per his rules...or leave this thread..

          and if you and others find my posts offensive too, or not to your liking, so be it...

          but it is never polite to twist or pretend to know better what a poster is really trying to say in his posts; and resort to misplaced bravado - as if you know and can tell where the fountain of youth is....

          nostradamus is long dead....
          You said they were very biased , your own words buddy , we all know they are but you acknowledged it yourself and now you to want wipe the chalk of the board , lol you guys are too much flip flop .

          i said i can relate to your issues with the slow mo videos...

          that means i could make the connection of your issues or concern about the video more so on the commentator being so biased etc etc....the very reason i asked you to review the videos on mute mode....

          Comment


            Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Post
            " slow motion are not how fights are judged."

            are we not just reviewing the fight? tell me, buddy...how do we review a fight? is it terribly wrong to watch it in slow mo, if available? will playing the fight in slow mo alter what really happened between the fighters that night? or allow the reviewer to get a clearer picture of what happened? what gives?

            or, do we just invite the 3 judges and bayless when we want to review this fight?

            Fights are judged in real time. I reviewed the fight many times. Not a few rounds, the whole fight. Not in slow motion, not as the judges saw it, but from the perspective of the camera crew and the angles they captured.

            I have no idea how many cameras/perspectives/camera angles were presented in the fight I saw on television, and neither do you.

            Think president Kennedy getting assinated and that one perspective that show something different.

            Same thing.

            Comment


              Since I am the dungeon keeper of this lair.

              I have to say Reloaded is again reaching.

              I have to call it as I see it.

              Reloaded got owned and check mated.

              Reloaded took a knee.

              Reloaded is losing to Tangalog.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
                Who are you laughing at? Tangalog or Reloaded? Who's checkmate?
                How do you feel about one of your main cheerleaders, Tangalog, ****ting all over your precious videos?

                Guess it's hard for you to find good help nowadays, huh?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                  How do you feel about one of your main cheerleaders, Tangalog, ****ting all over your precious videos?

                  Guess it's hard for you to find good help nowadays, huh?
                  ??

                  You must be that dumb.

                  You're excused

                  P.s. read the book I gave you. It will help you. Promise.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
                    You said they were very biased , your own words buddy , we all know they are but you acknowledged it yourself and now you to want wipe the chalk of the board , lol you guys are too much flip flop .

                    i said i can relate to your issues with the slow mo videos...

                    that means i could make the connection of your issues or concern about the video more so on the commentator being so biased etc etc....the very reason i asked you to review the videos on mute mode....
                    singing the same song, again....

                    i think you did not read my post #3088 or you did not understand it...

                    but knowing you now, it is not surprising...

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
                      ??

                      You must be that dumb.

                      You're excused

                      P.s. read the book I gave you. It will help you. Promise.
                      Dont you realize your buddy described your videos as very biased lol you really are slow on the uptake , here you go we must keep the thread up too date so anybody coming in to see the train wreck can see whats up .

                      i said i can relate to your issues with the slow mo videos...

                      that means i could make the connection of your issues or concern about the video more so on the commentator being so biased etc etc....the very reason i asked you to review the videos on mute mode....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP