Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[IMDAZED]

No, I didn't. See you're not even paying attention. I was talking about the stats I posted.

So you missed when I went over that too?

You're a ****ing clown.

[Mr. Punch-Out!!]

So you missed when I went over that too?

You're a ****ing clown.

Stop lying. You never went over that, you just trying to avoid it. You think you're slick.

[IMDAZED]

Stop lying. You never went over that.

Like you could comprehend.

Pacquiao won round seven

[Reloaded]

this was the same thing millions of people say about diego maradona's hand of god goal.

back then when slow mo was not really that popular they said it was clearly a header.

slow mo video says other wise.

try the slow mo video presented and then tell me who CLEARLY won the fight

Got nothing to do with this fight slo mo is good for line calls because its precise between a ball and a line from square angle , slo mo for boxing is not precise it doesnt catch all the angles that the judges see and can look like a connect from one angle and is not really from another and vias versa .

Boxing is points scoring and many elements gather points , Floyd won easily Manny was a puff of nothing their is no controversy anywhere in the world but in the empty heads of a very small number of Manny extremist fanboys .

Like I said you Pac clowns cannot comprehend the scoring of a boxing match , you leave out Ring Generalship , Defence , Effective Aggression , Fight Control . these element score big points and you fckwits leave it totally .

[Mr. Punch-Out!!]

Like you could comprehend.

Pacquiao won round seven

So you avoided the question and despite claiming that you answered it, you never bothered to show me the post where you supposedly did (though you had no problem doing this for the other post)?

The thing is, the way I interpreted the stats has nothing to do with being an idiot and is not even relevant to the subject. What's really idiotic is how you still gave that round to Floyd despite the evidence showing otherwise while still being too chicken to say whether or not you believe the stats shown on HBO (which actually favors Floyd). That's because you're stuck. If you agree with it, then you admit to being biased. If you disagree with it, then you admit that my point still stands; it was BS scoring.

[IMDAZED]

So you avoided the question and despite claiming that you answered it, you never bothered to show me the post where you supposedly did (though you had no problem doing this for the other post)?

The thing is, the way I interpreted the stats has nothing to do with being an idiot. What's really idiotic is how you still gave that round Floyd despite the evidence showed otherwise while still being too chicken to say whether or not you believe the stats shown on HBO. That's because you're stuck. If you agree with it, then you admit to being biased. If you disagree with it, then you admit that my point still stands; it was BS scoring.

LOl @ this post. Not worth reading and this will be my last response. Hopefully you'll do the same but you seem kinda dense so I won't be surprised if you don't.

You think Pacquiao won the seventh round. Safe to say that you're dumb as rocks. Keep up the good fight. I hope that brick wall doesn't hit you back.

[Mr. Punch-Out!!]

LOl @ this post. Not worth reading and this will be my last response. Hopefully you'll do the same but you seem kinda dense so I won't be surprised if you don't.

You think Pacquiao won the seventh round. Safe to say that you're dumb as rocks. Keep up the good fight. I hope that brick wall doesn't hit you back.

Just like I thought; be like Floyd and run. You might think you actually did something, chicken. lol

[Rath]

Got nothing to do with this fight slo mo is good for line calls because its precise between a ball and a line from square angle , slo mo for boxing is not precise it doesnt catch all the angles that the judges see and can look like a connect from one angle and is not really from another and vias versa .

Boxing is points scoring and many elements gather points , Floyd won easily Manny was a puff of nothing their is no controversy anywhere in the world but in the empty heads of a very small number of Manny extremist fanboys .

Like I said you Pac clowns cannot comprehend the scoring of a boxing match , you leave out Ring Generalship , Defence , Effective Aggression , Fight Control . these element score big points and you fckwits leave it totally .

and this proves judges scoring was horrific that night. what looks like a connected punch for floyd was actually not.

now have you watched those slow mo videos and found that there were punched thrown by floyd that clearly not a connected punched but will look like a connected punched from a judge view on his angle of sight?

you may also have noticed that all 3 judges scored all first 8 rounds just about the same and 2 judges scored all 12 rounds just about the same?

one judges just missed round 9 and 10, if not all 3 judges might have scored all 12 rounds of the fight identically the same.

which means they all saw those connected punched on all judges angle of sight?

now genius floyd fan tell me about your angle of sight theory.

[Reloaded]

and this proves judges scoring was horrific that night. what looks like a connected punch for floyd was actually not.

now have you watched those slow mo videos and found that there were punched thrown by floyd that clearly not a connected punched but will look like a connected punched from a judge view on his angle of sight?

you may also have noticed that all 3 judges scored all first 8 rounds just about the same and 2 judges scored all 12 rounds just about the same?

one judges just missed round 9 and 10, if not all 3 judges might have scored all 12 rounds of the fight identically the same.

which means they all saw those connected punched on all judges angle of sight?

now genius floyd fan tell me about your angle of sight theory.

It dont prove anything you fckn fence post , what about the misses from Manny that was scored as connects it goes both ways and the camera being a roaming camera rarely has a square line of sight especially when you have 3 judges all around the ring seeing a different picture , the idea of 3 is for a majority ruling and 3 judges scored Floyd a clear winner as did the rest of the world only Pac extremist see something else , isnt that a coincidence .

Why do you ignore the big scorers of boxing , Ring Generalship , Defence , Effective Aggression , Fight Control . you know why you ignore them because you have no fckn answer , Stevie Wonder could see that Floyd clearly controlled the fight he shut Manny down to nothing , he controlled the range and the pace , Floyd controlled the entire fight and Floyd was his usual self Manny was the one that could do nothing and lost at sea .

Reading your posts you assume so much and leave out so much , something is definitely missing intellectually when it comes to Pac extremist fans .

[DeadLikeMe]

You guys do realize if you can't bring yourself to watch a fight in its entirety, that's a very strong indicator that the fighter you're backing lost handily.

If Manny won outright there would be no need to make "seven" rounds of heavily edited, "slow mo", nonsense because Manny's biggest fans could stomach watching the full fight...