Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[Zaroku]

You should try to type in coherent English. But to answer what I think you're trying to say, NEVER.

How many times have I took a big dump on your thread and had you respond with "but but but...you're in the red."

Still waiting for your list of people who know **** about boxing who had #48 winning. Man up, boy.

I have been banned, been red. I think fools that believe the green are full of shyt.

Man up boy to spoon is great. I would add that he should pull that spoon out of his A55!

[Spoon23]

You should try to type in coherent English. But to answer what I think you're trying to say, NEVER.

How many times have I took a big dump on your thread and had you respond with "but but but...you're in the red."

Still waiting for your list of people who know **** about boxing who had #48 winning. Man up, boy.

Man up? Look at your history. On how many times I took you to school lol

Sorry if I've been disrespectful to you. It's just that when I talk to people who doesn't make sense. It tends to gives me a massive headache. Oh, and yeah, sorry also for making a minor typo since I've been using a tablet today.

Regarding that list you're asking, it's immaterial since the biggest evidence are the videos of the fight. Which none of your kind can and has ever disputed.

Sorry, if I disregard your views on your attempts to analyze. It's just worthless if I know too well how nonsensical you have been as a poster. You've been in here since 2008. Not even your Floyd fan boys are giving you green to save your rep. That's just alarming.

Comeback when your all Greened and only then will you be worthy to dance with me.

[Spoon23]

Will re watch the whole fight.

Did Castillo beat Floyd? How about Maidana 1?

Castillo 1st fight with floyd and Maidana's first fight with Floyd are both fights that should have gone to them. -Robbery

I've explained that to you right?

Marquez Pac 3, was a toss up, Marquez could have an argument he won it, if he did win it, I won't even question it.

Off course, the Floyd Pac fight is another questionable win by Floyd. As video evidence provides. Pac won it convincingly. -Robbery

[tangalog2200]

Great input. Green k. PAC beat the crap out of Marg, DLH, but he didn't land enough on Floyd. He didn't land enough to win. But I believe Castillo did. Maidana 1 might have been a draw, Floyd definitely had his hands full with the ball busting Maidana.

howdy? buddy!

I saw that you have agreed with spoon on one round already...and i can truly say i admire you're being honest...and i also have no problem with you and spoon doing the review of the other 4 rounds...that will be great....

however, i could not help but notice that you still have a hard time focusing...kindly complete your review/analysis of the remaining 4 rounds before you dwell on other fights....and likewise, please stop giving props to posts that do not clearly and cleanly dispute the videos and spoon's views...as you may end up contradicting yourself....

again, focus and disregard posts that refer to judges, other fighters, commentators etc etc but are just directed away from the 5 videos under review...

i will give more weight on your review over compubox, the judges etc etc

[Spoon23]

They don't really care about the fight. They just care about the decision, even when it is wrong like this one. They can't actually explain why Floyd deserved it and they know it.

Yup, they can give you tidbits of why they think Floyd won, but they can't really explain why he won.

Since,

hugger vs boxer..judges' verdict..hugger won the punches...LOL

The delusion is fl0mos can't even dispute the videos. Lol


Floyd fans having a hard time with someone stating that Floyd just didn't do as good as they think he did.

- The best punches - Thrown by Manny
- The best counter punches - Thrown by Manny
- Highlight type - Thrown by Manny
- Blocked punches - blocked by Manny
- Rounds clearly won - Manny


I think the Floyd fans got confused with this stat:
- The best hugs - by Floyd
- The best head locks - by Floyd
- The best running around and doing nothing - by Floyd
- The best bending below the waist - by Floyd
- The best pushing off the opponent - by Floyd
- The best at fighting scared - by Floyd
- The best at using his elbows - by Floyd
- The best "touch jabs" - by Floyd
- Did the stanky after a punch by the opponent - by Floyd
- Used an IV - by Floyd
- TUE paperwork and approval done after the fight - Floyd
- Cheated - Floyd
- The best judges that money can buy - by Floyd
- The best ref that money can buy - by Floyd
- The best drug testing company that money can buy - by Floyd
- The best commissions that money can buy - by Floyd

- The best at winning the round just because he is Floyd Mayweather and resides in Vegas, Nevada. Not because he actually won the round. - by Floyd

If you count all the 'by Floyd.' That must be the reason he won lol

FLoyd is such a technical fighter that even if he punches air he scores!!!" - #flowmoscience

#ILLEGAL IVY DIDN'T WORK FOR FROID

[DeadLikeMe]

Spoon has cried over Manny's failure for the duration of a human pregnancy

[tangalog2200]

I'm willing to play. I've already explained that your

"compubox is **** for judging boxing matches, but my compubox is better than your compubox because it fits my agenda"

thread is simply a waste of space since compubox isn't used to judge boxing matches, dummy. But I looked at your video and I'll go even further.

1. Notice how many times the (clearly biased) commentator says something like "that should not count, but if you want to count that, I'll count some of the things Pacquaio did." That makes it clear that he isn't even sure of what he's seeing.

2. Notice how he gives Pacquaio credit for in-fighting that is inconclusive. Lots of times it seems that Manny is positioning his arms inside or attempting to throw a body shot that is clearly insignificant. The commentator wants to discredit what he deemed to be many Mayweather insignificant blows, but wants to give Pacquaio credit for his "infighting" that didn't exist.

3. Often the angle of the video doesn't show landed punches clearly. The commentator says on a number of occasions that blows by Mayweather couldn't have landed because Pacquaio continues to counter. What? So we should assume punches didn't land because Pacquaio continues through with his punches? Ok, buddy. Many times being hit while throwing a punch leads to your punches going off mark, and we all saw how much Pacquaio MISSED! That also proves that you can be hit and continue to counter, of course.

4. He claims Mayweather was hurt in that round. I guess only Mayweather would know the answer to that. Clearly didn't appear to be hurt at any time to me. Heavy legs? There was barely anything landed in the round.

The next one is bolded because I found this really funny:
5. He praised Lederman for giving round 2 to Pacquaio. Wonder if he will accept Lederman's entire scorecard. What do you think?

Harold Lederman: 117 - 111 Mayweather

As I celebrate the Lunar New Year, I sat back watching this fight again. Not because it was exciting, but because I love rewatching film of the event that ruined Pacroaches lives. Watched the skysports version and the commentators mentioned that a few of the rounds they scored for Mayweather were close and could have gone the other way, but they only hope that the right man would be declared the winner in the end because they did believe there was a clear winner. They believed it was Mayweather.

They got their wish. The right man won, and it was Mayweather.

In conclusion, your compubox is just as lame as any other compubox, which is why compubox is not used to score a boxing match.

Now that I've addressed your video, find me 3 boxers, boxing trainers, or boxing judges that scored this fight for Pacquaio. I imagine that I'll be waiting as long as you've been/will be crying about the outcome.

Mike Tyson: "It's him, who he is. It's his era. It's his time. When a man's time has come, nothing can stop him. He's in invincible mode now."

Robert Garcia: "Mayweather did what he had to do, but I was a little disappointed more in Pacquiao,…I thought he was going to give him a better fight…They didn’t have a gameplan”

Sugar Ray Leonard: “Floyd Mayweather did what he had to do to stay undefeated…and that’s boxing smart.”

Carl Froch: 118 - 110 Mayweather

Larry Merchant: Pacquaio “let everyone down in this fight”

Cheers

oh my!

bro if you just turned the volume off and review the videos in mute mode then score the fight yourself, then your post would have contributed more...and not just a bashing of the commentator....

also, please focus on the videos....forget harold, forget roach, forget the scorecards etc etc so you can give your own unbiased review/analysis of the fight...

thanks

[travestyny]

Man up? Look at your history. On how many times I took you to school lol

Sorry if I've been disrespectful to you. It's just that when I talk to people who doesn't make sense. It tends to gives me a massive headache. Oh, and yeah, sorry also for making a minor typo since I've been using a tablet today.

Regarding that list you're asking, it's immaterial since the biggest evidence are the videos of the fight. Which none of your kind can and has ever disputed.

Sorry, if I disregard your views on your attempts to analyze. It's just worthless if I know too well how nonsensical you have been as a poster. You've been in here since 2008. Not even your Floyd fan boys are giving you green to save your rep. That's just alarming.

Comeback when your all Greened and only then will you be worthy to dance with me.

So you're still talking about little colored boxes? Is that really all you have?

I've already pointed out how your video is nonsense, but you couldn't respond to any of it. Instead, you deflected by talking about colored squares. That is enough to let me know you have no comeback.

Your videos' creator seemed to praise Lederman when it suited his agenda. Again, what do you think he thought of Lederman's scorecard? Is he going to praise him for the rounds he gave to pacquaio, but otherwise throw out his opinion? Hmmm. But no, that's not biased, is it?

By the way, Lederman, whom your boy praised, gave the 3rd round to Mayweather!

Come back at me when you have more than "but but but...you're red."

[Zaroku]

howdy? buddy!

I saw that you have agreed with spoon on one round already...and i can truly say i admire you're being honest...and i also have no problem with you and spoon doing the review of the other 4 rounds...that will be great....

however, i could not help but notice that you still have a hard time focusing...kindly complete your review/analysis of the remaining 4 rounds before you dwell on other fights....and likewise, please stop giving props to posts that do not clearly and cleanly dispute the videos and spoon's views...as you may end up contradicting yourself....

again, focus and disregard posts that refer to judges, other fighters, commentators etc etc but are just directed away from the 5 videos under review...

i will give more weight on your review over compubox, the judges etc etc

I ignore compubox in general. But each round of this fight is in dispute. Even the rounds PAC won. It would be unfair to not judge the whole fight round by round.

To do otherwise is disingenuous.

[tangalog2200]

I ignore compubox in general. But each round of this fight is in dispute. Even the rounds PAC won. It would be unfair to not judge the whole fight round by round.

To do otherwise is disingenuous.

i hear you....

but please complete the review of the remaining 4 rounds presented first...

then you may continue with the other rounds to prove your case...

that will be fun and extend this enjoyable thread...and perhaps you could paint spoon in a corner, for a change....