Jim Watt! Your view good commentator or not

[typeone]

Some good posts guy's.. Fare points TBH

I have noticed on my return to this site,there's not so many Jockeys that don't know what there actually talking about..

[HackneyBoy]

I've been listening to him since the Tyson years, I need someone to dislike during an anxiety ridden title fight. I hate him and love him the same time!

[salitap4p#1]

I like him. I think he called Froch-Groves correctly. And Khan-Peterson was another controversial one which I agreed with him on.

[KO'er]

I enjoy his commentary.

If a British fighter is underperforming against a foreign fighter he isn't afraid to score the fight for the foreigner and say the British fighter isn't performing well.

[jas]

Horrific. Ridiculously biased in recent groves, bute and burns fights

[tyger]

Much better fighter than commentator.

[Mugwump]

Jim Watt is the ONLY commentator - across every single sport I've dabbled in during forty years - who consistently views an entirely different contest to the one I'm watching.

He's like some kind of weird bioware NOT gate. Or divine punishment for the excesses of the British Empire.

And he sucks. Donkey balls.

[IronDanHamza]

His commentary shakes me right to me boots.

He literally says all of these things every fight. And that's all he say's.

"Long pause......nah/nope"

Laughed at that one.

The main problem for me is it's obvious Watt doesn't actually follow Boxing any more. He always has no clue about the fighters he's commentating on unless he's commentated on them before.

[New England]

the best ever.
TBE

the profundity of the word "punchees."

[New England]

his voice IS boxing, like john motson IS football or that snooker chap..

that said, i'd like a fanzone-type option for fights, like they used to do on sky for the football. maybe we could get fighters wives to do commentary? or get lee froch to commentate on froch V groves II, now that would be shyte commentary

that's depressing.