Hagler was Absolutely the WEAKEST of the Big 4.

[The Old LefHook]

Szzz...Snzzz...Snzzz. Such malarky.

[Build That Wall]

IMO, Leonard was the weakest.

IMO, The Big 4 consists of Hearns, Hagler, Duran, Pryor.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

IMO, Leonard was the weakest.

IMO, The Big 4 consists of Hearns, Hagler, Duran, Pryor.

Stay in NSB

[Scott9945]

Stay in NSB

Comparing Pryor's career to Leonard's...

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Comparing Pryor's career to Leonard's...

Lol... Leonard only went 4-1-1 vs 3 of the 4 guys he mentioned..

Benitez has a better claim than pryor does

[Joeyzagz]

Haggler being too short for 175 is a very Lousey excuse. He was the same height as the Heavyweight champion at the time.

Not only did Haglet refuse to move up, he wouldn't even drop down to meet some of these guys halfway. They all were forced to fight at his weight class.

[rightsideup]

Haggler being too short for 175 is a very Lousey excuse. He was the same height as the Heavyweight champion at the time.

Not only did Haglet refuse to move up, he wouldn't even drop down to meet some of these guys halfway. They all were forced to fight at his weight class.

they all wanted his title to make history

[The plunger man]

If that were true, Hagler wouldn't have beaten Duran and Hearns and come close to beating Leonard, who waited until Hagler was well past it to fight him.

Hagler lost to Leonard not because he was past it....he lost it because always had to much sped and intelligence for him...Duran when he boxed hagler was way past it after losing to Leonard and the hearns and Benitez ....a classic comparison s when Marcos Geraldo boxed Leonard and he boxed hagler....they asked who would win between them 2 ..Geraldo looked up and said Leonard...he is to refined and has to much skill... He's the better boxer..drawing with searles , losing to Monroe who totally out boxed hagler the first fight ....juan roldan who was actually bossing hagler untill hagler thumbed him intentionally...and if you look closely you actually see hagler punching up with his fist sideways......gong back to Leonard he had one fight in five years ....never weighed above 153 ....hagler 2 years previous had one of his defining fights with hearns.....when Leonard was in his prime he never lost to a type like Monroe, or draw with a searls ...he was just a better boxer and that's why he is ranked above hagler in every p4p list from any historian...hagler got his legacy from calling up welterweights or lightweights .....but one of the those welterweights was just a notch above.....hagler a limitations were shown when Duran took him all the way and after the fight Duran leaned through the ropes and said to Leonard ...sugar u can beat hagler

[The plunger man]

Hagler couldn't hold 175 at 5'9" and be in his normal great condition.
Most fighters stayed in one division unless they entered boxing at a young age and naturally grew out of the weight class.
haglers record right from the start is one of the BEST records in Middleweight history. Just because the OP doesn't know the men on it doesn't mean its not quality. Try studying the men on the list and understand Hagler fought men who plenty of other Middleweights avoided.
I'm not relisting his opponents I just did it a few weeks ago, his record is outstanding and his competition was excellant!
Ray

You have real warped sense of reality....ur saying hagler at 5'9 could never hold the weight of 175 ...and yet Duran was 5'7 he went from 130 up to 168 ...Leonard from 147 to 168......so every career defining fight he had a natural advantage in strength and power correct....but they still faced him.....so bull**** he should have moved up and proved himself in a higher weight....dwight braxton was 5'7 and he was a light heavyweight...even chris Eubanks went to light heavyweight and faced Carl Thompson...calzaghe, Jones lol...u cliaim to know boxing but you don't

[joseph5620]

Stay in NSB