Top 3 heavyweights to throw against Klitchko

[juggernaut666]

very easy, yes, objective looking such as... quoting the man himself about his opinion of himself, which is the polar opposite of being objective.

Thats bc it seems the site is filled with guys who really look at boxing with beer goggles on or are just simple fanboys of guys like fury an Holyfield for ex... only a select few on here who really do know what there talking about ...a FEW ....

cinescape the only one other than myself that said anything practical here so far....

[DreamFighter]

Thats bc it seems the site is filled with guys who really look at boxing with beer goggles on or are just simple fanboys of guys like fury an Holyfield for ex... only a select few on here who really do know what there talking about ...a FEW ....

Joseph and cinescape are the only one other than myself that said anything practical here so far....

such as you claiming objectivity is needed and then in the same post quoting wld stating he beats all, as your evidence.

[juggernaut666]

such as you claiming objectivity is needed and then in the same post quoting wld stating he beats all, as your evidence.

I dont need direct quotes thats only subjective ,i know Holyfield struggling with a 43 year old Holmes and having trouble with long range jabbers wouldn't be remotely a pick for me against Wlad thats called common sense .Everyone i did list does have the best chance against him wheather anyone agrees or not doesnt matter ,i know what im talking about.Somebody even put Joe Louis?