Byrd was a very good boxer who never utilized all his skills. He did not press the laterial movement as much as he could have to use his foot work to miniplulate his opponents into following or stepping over into his punching lanes. His lack of power was a distraction for him as he moved up in caliber. If he did this he'd have more success against the bigger men who happened to be stronger but much slower and had less co-ordination! Its difficult for successfull amatuers to transition into pro boxing but sometimes you just bring your amatuer style with you and increase the levels of that style simular to what Howard Davis back to Willie Pep did and those men were very successfull in the pro rankings. To box at that level using those methods and techniques your conditioning has to be at an extremely high level. You don't have to out fight your opponent all the time there were fighters who could out smart and out "hustle" plenty of quality fighters!
I think he tried to adapt to the "pro style" instead of using his natural abilities but bringing them to a very high level! Good boxer, not much power, I don't think he was underated or overated. I believe he's considered by most as a contender. I know he won a title but theres just way too many to call everyone champ! Ray.
I think he tried to adapt to the "pro style" instead of using his natural abilities but bringing them to a very high level! Good boxer, not much power, I don't think he was underated or overated. I believe he's considered by most as a contender. I know he won a title but theres just way too many to call everyone champ! Ray.
Comment