Assuming that Tunney actually needed the time (was it 13 seconds I think?), how would your ranking of Dempsey differ if he had KOed Tunney in their second meeting? How would Tunney's rating be affected?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dempsey and the Long Count
Collapse
-
I think it would have put him up a notch or two in the atg ratings.
By dropping gene jack proved he still had the power,stamina, heart and some of the speed to to tag an elusive fighter who beat him easly in a prior bout. Some historians rate jack above gene anyhow because jack was beyond his prime in both fights.
-
Originally posted by rightsideup View PostI think it would have put him up a notch or two in the atg ratings.
By dropping gene jack proved he still had the power,stamina, heart and some of the speed to to tag an elusive fighter who beat him easly in a prior bout. Some historians rate jack above gene anyhow because jack was beyond his prime in both fights.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BigStereotype View PostAs a heavyweight, I do, but not all time. Gene Tunney is the better p4p fighter as much as it hurts me to admit it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rightsideup View PostAre you saying that jack was more of natural heavey weight then gene?
Comment
-
I don't think it changes anything if Dempsey had won. Tunney would probably be held in slightly less regard as a heavyweight......but there is still no doubt that up to the knockdown Gene was doing another boxing masterclass.
As has already been said, this was an old Jack Dempsey. I've got a feeling that prime for prime Dempsey would have too much pace for Tunney.
Comment
-
I would view him in the same light. Dempsey fought Tunney when he was out of shape and done with the sport.
Had they fought 5 years earlier I would count on Dempsey to put him away.
Comment
-
Comment