2 division top 10 fighters

[Boxing Bob]

I wanna know who would make the agruement Charles was a top 10 hwt let alone top 3

[IronDanHamza]

One could make the argument that ezzard charles was top 3 LHW top 3 HW

Another underrated win in which marciano gets 0 credit for even though charles was only 32 and had twice the ring experience and was taller and weighed more and had way longer reach

No, you can't.

[JAB5239]

One could make the argument that ezzard charles was top 3 LHW top 3 HW

Another underrated win in which marciano gets 0 credit for even though charles was only 32 and had twice the ring experience and was taller and weighed more and had way longer reach

There is no argument Charles is a top 3 heavy. You could argue top 10, but no way top 3.

[Barn]

Armstrong, FW, WW.

[Forza]

I meant charles was a top 3 HW in his division when he was fighting, not ATG

[goblin213]

What about Fighting Harada, gentlemen? Could one make the argument that he is top 10 all time at fly and bantam?

[JAB5239]

I meant charles was a top 3 HW in his division when he was fighting, not ATG

Of course he was. For his era it would be Marciano, Charles and than Walcott in my opinion. But this is an all time exercise.I suppose if you want to get technical you could put Charles at lightheavy and p4p, but p4p isn't a weight class and far more subjective due to the wider scope of fighters.

[lazy]

Would Emile Griffith qualify?

[BattlingNelson]

Besides the names mentioned I've got a longshot: Ray Leonard. Definetely top 10 WW. Question is if the Hagler win alone puts him in the top 10 at 160. I reckon it could be argued considering Hagler is top 3 all-time.

[Barn]

Besides the names mentioned I've got a longshot: Ray Leonard. Definetely top 10 WW. Question is if the Hagler win alone puts him in the top 10 at 160. I reckon it could be argued considering Hagler is top 3 all-time.

I just don't see it, maybe in a less stacked division you could do things like that (Tunney at HW to a certain extent) but, not at MW.