I just want your honest thoughts on his legacy, greatness, resume, & skills overall.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Naseem Hamed
Collapse
-
-
Under rated by many and over rated by others
Good record/resume but nothing special.
Hamed never took full advantage of his abilities and should have been held in higher regard than he is
His real legacy will be his entertainment value, his theatrics and showmanship
Im a fan, he lit up the sport for a while and had bone crushing power
-
Originally posted by The Surgeon View PostUnder rated by many and over rated by others
Good record/resume but nothing special.
Hamed never took full advantage of his abilities and should have been held in higher regard than he is
His real legacy will be his entertainment value, his theatrics and showmanship
Im a fan, he lit up the sport for a while and had bone crushing power
Comment
-
Obviously I am a fan but I do feel he gets a lot of unfair stick for the way his career ended.
I used to watch Naz on Sky Sports when I was young and he basically got me into boxing. He was so exciting to watch and I loved the swagger and the arrogance.
He would dance about and then get in and knock somebody out. Just pure entertainment..
He did a hell of a lot more good for the Sport than bad and I think people should appreciate that whether you liked him or not.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PrinceNaz88 View PostObviously I am a fan but I do feel he gets a lot of unfair stick for the way his career ended.
I used to watch Naz on Sky Sports when I was young and he basically got me into boxing. He was so exciting to watch and I loved the swagger and the arrogance.
He would dance about and then get in and knock somebody out. Just pure entertainment..
He did a hell of a lot more good for the Sport than bad and I think people should appreciate that whether you liked him or not.
I don't understand why people say Barrera 'schooled' Naz, 116-111 isn't a particularily wide scorecard.
Also I think he had ability which would have propelled his legacy much higher, he wasted it by not training properly, after he left Ingle, Naz fell in love with his power and relied on that to get him through fights, due to this, his reflexes deteriorated.
A great entertainer but a waste of talent which could've earned him legendary status.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KillerRightHook View PostDefinately, he lit up boxing.
I don't understand why people say Barrera 'schooled' Naz, 116-111 isn't a particularily wide scorecard.
Also I think he had ability which would have propelled his legacy much higher, he wasted it by not training properly, after he left Ingle, Naz fell in love with his power and relied on that to get him through fights, due to this, his reflexes deteriorated.
A great entertainer but a waste of talent which could've earned him legendary status.
I agree with everything you have said there about relying on power, lack of training etc
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Surgeon View PostUnder rated by many and over rated by others
Good record/resume but nothing special.
Hamed never took full advantage of his abilities and should have been held in higher regard than he is
His real legacy will be his entertainment value, his theatrics and showmanship
Im a fan, he lit up the sport for a while and had bone crushing power
Comment
-
-
Best entertainer in boxing history. Had 3 very very high quality wins that constantly get underrated. Tom Johnson Vuvani Bungu and Wilfredo Vasquez all 3 guys were at the top of there game and Naz dominated them
Comment
Comment