Originally posted by Heckler
Im not an Ali nut-hugger at all... but you are a blinded Ali-hating *****. Ali was out on his feet? and, that happened to him multiple times against Frazier but he had the heart and the ability to deal with it. Center ring fighting accounted for enough of the match to convince me and alot of people that in Ali's prime when hes moving laterally and fluidly he would pick Foreman to pieces... he would not be on the ropes like he was in 74'. An angry foreman? Foreman always appeared angry in the ring and if there was a rematch in 74' his mentality wasn't going to immediately change. It took him a few years and the hiring of Gil Clancy for him to become a more controlled fighter, and this style didn't work as well for him and he was BEATEN by young. Lyle was nothing special and nor was young, how many top 10 lists do you see them in?... they aren't comparable to Ali at all. Young troubled Ali but that doesn't make him a great fighter, thats merely an example of styles making fights. He went on to beat, an old, battered, blind Joe Frazier after manila - they both left their best in the ring night. A relatively young Foreman beating that version of Frazier doesn't impress at all. Michael moorer? a glass chinned, solid but not great boxer who was knocked out by Tua? He beat holyfield... but thats all. 'Every aspect of that fight leaned towards Ali's favor' - thats because Ali was the more skilled, tougher, smarter fighter. If they did rematch in 74' what would big George do differently? boxing historians note that his newfound controlled style didn't work as well as his previous. Hes going to attack Ali on the ropes in a more controlled fashion? and get outpointed via Ali's counterpunching with superior speed? and outpointed via Ali's control of what center-ring action takes place?
Your argument is the ridiculous one, that Ali could only beat Foreman 1/100 times... and that 1% chance happened to occur in the only fight they had with Foreman at his peak? bull****
Im not an Ali-nuthugger. I acknowledge his flaws, he didn't know how to block a jab and he never worked the body. I still believe that he would beat any boxer 2/3 times from any time period in his 67' prime. And i acknowledge he could be beaten 1/3 times by the likes of holmes, frazier, and Joe Louis. But never George Foreman, 67' or 74.
Your argument is the ridiculous one, that Ali could only beat Foreman 1/100 times... and that 1% chance happened to occur in the only fight they had with Foreman at his peak? bull****
Im not an Ali-nuthugger. I acknowledge his flaws, he didn't know how to block a jab and he never worked the body. I still believe that he would beat any boxer 2/3 times from any time period in his 67' prime. And i acknowledge he could be beaten 1/3 times by the likes of holmes, frazier, and Joe Louis. But never George Foreman, 67' or 74.
Comment